pushing | push notification framework that does not hurt | Notification library

You will not find this information in the documentation, because it is not a single feature per se, it is simply the compiler/optimizer working its way through the query in various phases, using a number of different techniques to get the best execution plan. Sometimes it can safely push through predicates, sometimes it can't.

Note that "expanding the view" is the wrong term here. The view is always expanded into its definition (NOEXPAND excepted). What you are referring to is called predicate pushdown.

I've assumed here that indexed views and NOEXPAND are not being used.

When you execute a query, the compiler starts by parsing and lexing the query into a basic execution plan. This is a very rough, unoptimized version which pretty much mirrors the query as written.

When there is a view in the query, the compiler will retrieve the view's pre-parsed execution tree and shoves it into the execution plan, again it is a very rough draft.

With derived tables, CTEs, correlated and non-correlated subqueries, as well as inline TVFs, the same thing happens, except that parsing is needed also.

After this point, you can assume that a view may as well have been written as a CTE, it makes no difference.

The compiler has a number of tricks up its sleeve, and predicate pushdown is one of them, as is simplifying views.

The ability of the compiler here is mainly dependent on whether it can deduce that a simplification is permitted, not that it is possible.

For example, this query

After searching on the web and trying numerous packages like cupertino_will_pop_scope and back_button_interceptor I found that none of them worked for my use case.

cupertino_will_pop_scope was a miss and hit thing so sometimes it worked and sometimes it didnt.

here is a solution for anyone who hasn't found an answer to this yet.

as I mentioned before the WillPopScope works perfectly on android so no need to change functionality over there.

for IOS however I used Gesture Detector to detect a swipe from left gesture and do my actions accordingly.

I solved it following @Miguel's comment.

Long story short, the useEffect() function is executing on every render, and every time it executes it adds a new handler without deleting the previous one, so after a few renders things get out of control exponentially. So I just added a line to delete the handler when it finishes.

When doing the push through command line (terminal), I found out that the error was produced due to a file that had a size of +100MB. I had to remove it and everything went fine.

Remark: That file was a pod library. So, be careful when pushing all your project. At the end, to backup the whole project you just need the podfile, as it is the one you use to install pod libraries.

One solution could be to emit the sizeHintChanged signal of the item delegate of your view every time the size of any of the widgets is changed. This tells the view that the position of the items should be updated. To achieve this you could override the resizeEvent of ExpandableFrame and emit a custom signal, e.g.

You could consider pushing a higher-order component to the array and then providing the prop when you render it.

You would add it like this:

Yes, it is supported. I think the problem is your code, which has a couple of errors:

1. To use the goto feature, you need to start the inline assembly statement with the asm goto keywords. You are missing the goto.

2. The label operands are numbered sequentially after the input operands (and of course there cannot be outputs). So failed is operand 4, and therefore you need to refer to it with bcc %l4, not %l0.

With these changes I'm able to compile the code.

By the way, I don't know much about m68k assembly, but it looks like you are clobbering register d1, along with whatever the _BURAM subroutine clobbers, yet those have not been declared as clobbers. Shouldn't you add "d1" and the rest along with "cc"?

Also, it seems like maybe you are expecting the operands d0_fcode, a0_info, etc, to be put in those specific registers, presumably because _BURAM expects them there. Do you have those variables defined register asm to tell the compiler about that, e.g. register int d0_fcode asm("d0");? Otherwise it could for instance choose d4 for the d0_fcode operand. In my test it happens by chance that they get put in the desired registers, without explicitly asking, but that is not safe to rely on.

The problem was caused by my custom enricher being registered before Enrich.FromLogContext(); e.g.:

For this there is the update-index command.

Most likely you want something like this: