ubi | The Universal Binary Installer | DevOps library

I can think of three reasonable approaches to do this, depending on what exactly you're trying to copy in.

Separate Dockerfile per file set. Say these images are substantially different in some predictable way; one image has application-a.jar and static-files.zip, and another has application-b.jar, static-files.zip, and public-keys.zip. You can create two separate Dockerfiles

Using different image (ibmcom/websphere-liberty:some21.0.0.3version) and pointing FEATURE_REPO_URL to place where 21.0.0.3 repo is hosted works.

So whoever prepared 19.0.0.3 image for me and said which feature repo to use, pointed me to some incompatible artefacts.

What is interesting, when I combined different versions of image vs repo, configure.sh was nicely verbose (it explained there is incompatibility), but this error CWWKF1259E: Unable to obtain the following assets is really unhelpful.

---- solution

In MySQL, sad to say, pivoting is hard to do for a mess of arbitrarily named columns.

This gets the result you want (dbfiddle on db-fiddle.com, which offers MySQL 8.)

The problem is in Dockerfile, you use product image in all three services. When you have several FROM statements, it won't build three images. This is used for multi-stage building, e.g. when you use one image (stage) to compile a binary and another one to just hold the product without compilers, kernel headers, etc.

One way you can solve this is to split the Dockerfile into three separate files (credit.Dockerfile,client.Dockerfile,product.Dockerfile) and then mention each one in their respective service:

You're almost there. Add GROUP BY id_contents to the end of your query.

It seems i polluted the space with an embarrassing mistake; for Google Cloud App Engine ,flex environment, the app.yaml file should be placed in the root folder; it is also documented

Moreover, for some reason, the max_num_instances should be explicitly set to a value of max 8, according to account quota google documentation otherwise a EXAHUSTED_RESOURCE exception is thrown.

You need to concatenate sID_c with a number returned by ROW_NUMBER() window function:

I do not know for certain, but I believe that it is because your kernel is too old. I had exactly the same problem building an image on an Ubuntu 14.04 box with kernel 3.13.0-151 running Docker 18.06-1. The same Dockerfile builds fine on an Ubuntu 16.04 box with kernel 4.4.0-101 running the same build of Docker. I couldn't find any other configuration differences between those hosts.