skim | Fuzzy Finder in rust

Your indentations are invalid syntax but I'm assuming this is just code formatting typos.

In any case you aren't using idiomatic capitalization conventions. In particular the class name should be upper case leading letter. Why is only Spd upper case first letter and not the other parameters?

I suspect the substance of your query is about editing a container whilst iterating over it. Naively doing this, the iterator won't be privy to the changes you make to the container whilst iterating over it. Often best practice is to iterate over a copy of the container whilst editing the original.

What's the correct way in Delphi to check if a non-Suspended created TThread with FreeOnTerminate = True is still executing?

There is none.

As soon as self destroying thread is started, you are no longer allowed to touch reference holding such thread from outside code, because that reference can become stale at any time.

Under some circumstances (if logic handling OnTerminate call in DoTerminate is not modified in your custom thread class) you can safely access thread reference from OnTerminate event handler. However, that will not help you solve your problem because you cannot wait on self destroying thread. On Windows such code causes exception that can be caught and handled, but on other platforms it causes undefined behavior and random deadlocks. But even on Windows writing such code is not advisable.

If you need to check status of a thread, cancel it or wait for it, you cannot use self destroying threads. Period. (For those that may object previous statement, yes under some circumstances some of those things are possible, but they commonly lead to shooting yourself in the foot).

You can use following workflow with TWorkerThread, providing that you leave FreeOnTerminate on False in your thread constructor and construct unsuspended thread. All following methods must be called from the main thread to avoid race condition on Worker reference. Having one extra thread that does nothing while your form is open will not cause you any trouble.

I figured out the solution: (Using inbuilt swap method for efficient memory swaps!)

The order is not the issue here, the problem is you're not fully understanding how Mongo indexes array's.

The way Mongo does it is by flattening the arrays and indexing each element individually, This means that elements that look like so (below) will still match the index hence making the FETCH stage much bigger than it needs to be.

With Help:Effective-Pom:

mvn -Dverbose=true -Doutput=./effective-pom.xml help:effective-pom

We can analyze our "effective pom" (Pom#inheritance, Pom#super-Pom).

• The verbose flag will also add the source pom (artifact) as a comment to each output line.
• output sets an output file. (default: prints to console)

"inter alia" it allows us to locate/override any inherited plugin/dependency/"pom element".

Unfortunately the output generates:

• for "trivial" projects "hundreds" lines of pom.
• for "non-trivial" (spring-boot-starter), it gets easily into "ten-thousands" (lines of pom).

In intellij we have a "Show effective Pom" command, which basically invokes the mentioned goal and shows the output (in community edition unfortunately!?) without "verbose".

netbeans has a "Effective" tab in its "Pom Editor":

• scrolling/cursoring is here also "cumbersome", but we have "full":
• "Navigation" (window) support
• Text search
• Code hints, etc...

(, "Graph" view also very nice...(and unique feature among "maven IDES (that i know)", and it can be installed un-rooted;)!

So the mojo seems to work as documented:

boolean (since:)3.2.0 Output POM input location as comments.

Default value is: false.

User property is: verbose.

For verbose to have an effect, we need to:

You were almost there. (1) You need a named vector (I think), not a list; (2) the names of the list should match the elements of the faceting variable, not the already-labeled values (i.e. the strip labels).

IMHO you have to go the long way. There is no shorter way to describe it.

Regardless of that, I would recommend you overthink your testing strategy. At the moment you test that a very specific combination of methods is called but not if these method calls are actually doing what you want them to do.

Instead, I would create an example record that should be deleted (and perhaps a couple that should not be deleted), then run the job and afterward test that only the expected record was deleted.

For example like this:

Usually, an infinite loader is used to have a small subset of data that you then expand for performance reasons: not having to load 100 elements at once but 10, then 10 more etc...

If you already have the data locally at once and like the behavior of it, without any "pagination" needed from your Strapi backend, you can always watch for the @infinite event and increase the size of your initial array of elements with the next one.

Saying that if you display 10 of them, want to scroll down and show 10 more: display the first 10, then when the infinite event is triggered, append 10 more items to your initial array and so on.

My previous answer may help understand it a bit more.

PS: beware of some reactivity issues that you may face one day when dealing with arrays.

You seem to have a bit of a misconception.
Let's take your unchanged data in the form of tibble and put it in the skim function.