rust-analyzer | A Rust compiler front-end for IDEs
kandi X-RAY | rust-analyzer Summary
kandi X-RAY | rust-analyzer Summary
rust-analyzer is a modular compiler frontend for the Rust language. It is a part of a larger rls-2.0 effort to create excellent IDE support for Rust. Work on rust-analyzer is sponsored by.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of rust-analyzer
rust-analyzer Key Features
rust-analyzer Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on rust-analyzer
QUESTION
I encountered this strange behaviour when reading this post, and the core question of this post is when you matching (&k, &v) = &(&String, &String)
, k
and v
will get the type String
.
To figure out what's happending, I wote the following test code, and the result is much more shocking and confusing to me:
...
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Apr-04 at 04:23This is called "destructuring". It's used commonly in pattern matching like with if let Some(val) = option
.
Essentially, this:
QUESTION
I'm working on a rust project and you have to pick some features to decide the linear programming module to get the project to compile. Normally, I can run check with cargo check --features lp_coincbc,blas_openblas-system
and everything works fine. However, the Rust Analyzer VSCode Extension gives me errors (compile_error!
s that are built into the project) even though I have this set up in my VScode settings.json
file.
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-04 at 00:02To those that come across this question, Rust Analyzer was not the actual issue here. Instead, there was another plugin cargo
that was also performing checks and did not have the features specified. After uninstalling the plugin, everything worked fine.
The way I figured out that this was that it was this issue was by following the advice of @ChayimFriedman to analyze what was actually reporting the problem. Since nothing was claiming the error, it couldn't be Rust Analyzer, as when it reports errors, the source shows rust-analyzer
. This led me to look into the other plugins installed.
QUESTION
fn foo(ok: bool) -> Result {
if ok { Ok(0) } else { Err(0) }
}
fn main() {
let Ok(x) | Err(x) = foo(true); // rust-analyzer error: top-level or-patterns are not allowed in `let` bindings
if let Ok(x) | Err(x) = foo(true) { // rust-analyzer warn: irrefutable `if let` pattern
println!("Working!");
}
}
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-31 at 16:53The reason that top-level or-patterns aren't allowed is because it would cause certain macro_rules!
macros to break. The pattern in a let expression should be matchable by a single $p:pat
, but without requiring it to be parenthesized, a $p:pat
would only consume the first part of the or-pattern.
Note that you can work around this easily, as the compiler suggests when you try this:
QUESTION
When I don't include the + 'static
in this code, rustc
complains. Why?
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-14 at 23:24You need to explicitly state what the lifetime of the Trait Object &'dyn DefDatabase
is so that the borrow checker knows what the lifetime of any references held by the struct behind the pointer are. 'static
is the default if you do not define it, or it cannot otherwise be determined from the context. See default trait object lifetimes in the rust language reference for more information.
Adding a lifetime to your Upcast
trait definition allows you to drop 'static
.
QUESTION
I need to turn off overflow checks in unit tests. I can use command line to accomplish this using cargo test --release
, however:
- GUI test buttons provided by rust-analyzer provide a better experience, however they're configured to run on debug mode with overflow checks on.
cargo test --release
hidesprintln!
statements, but I would like to see them.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-28 at 12:45Just disable overflow checking for tests in your Cargo.toml file:
QUESTION
Got this error with rust-analyzer
VS Code, although cargo build
builds the project without errors or warnings.
rustc
version: 1.54.0
I would like to stay on the "stable" rustc
version and not shift to "nightly".
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-23 at 11:21Update rustc
to fix this and ensure that Visual Studio Code uses the correct Rust compiler.
- Run
rustup update
to updaterustc
- Check version used by
rust-analyzer
: Ensure thatctrl+p -> Rust Analyzer: Show RA Version
showsrust-analyzer version: 183ef048f 2021-11-22 stable
. - Run
cargo clean
to clear obsoleted compiler output - Close all VS Code windows and open them again.
This should fix the issue. If not, have a look here.
QUESTION
For VS Code, I use rust-analyzer
to handle syntax highlighting and flychecking. But if I don't add type annotations to declarations in the code, rust-analyzer
shows the missing type annotations in the file without actually inserting it in the code. Is there a way to turn this off?
I prefer to add my own type annotations and I'm more likely to forget that if rust-analyzer
shows me the missing annotations, and sometimes they're in the way as I have auto formatting on save set, and this formatting breaks up the lines correctly. With rust-analyzers
's type annotation help, some lines become too long to fit on my screen.
In the picture below, it's the grey text I'm referring to. I would like it gone.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-10 at 09:23In Visual Studio Code you can easily do this.
- Open the settings page (Ctrl+,)
- Search for "rust-analyzer inlay"
- Uncheck things you don't want
- In your case that would be "Parameter Hints" and "Type Hints"
If you're not using Visual Studio Code you'll need to manually edit the JSON config file of rust-analyzer (helpful link to the documentation). Basically
- Open the JSON config file in your favourite text editor
- Add a new property to the root of the JSON object like so:
QUESTION
I am using functions called on the dependency trait NonFungibleTokenCore
and I would like to use the convivence wrapper of ext_contract
to simplify cross contract calls.
Here is my attempt to add it:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-08 at 13:24Unfortunately, the ext_contract
proc macro is only aware of the code within that block, and cannot generate code based on the methods of the Supertrait definition of NonFungibleTokenCore
here https://github.com/roshkins/sputnik-dao-contract/blob/bc8398257cdbee248fdd6301af0dc41a9b7c5236/sputnik-nft-staking/src/lib.rs#L18.
For now, you would have to redefine the interface, but I will ask around if there is a cleaner way to do this.
Something like this might solve your immediate problem:
QUESTION
So for example,
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-04 at 11:33It is possible to fix it with rustfix
but according to github issue, this lint is filtered out, it can be included via setting env var(ref).
for Windows:
QUESTION
A similar question was asked for Eclipse: Add Java Docs in Eclipse working on OpenJDK
I found /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64/lib/src.zip on my system.
Building and runing a source file works. Documentation is shown for dependencies loaded via Maven. The documentation for the Java standard library is missing.
Examples:
hovering over
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jul-14 at 09:21You could try using this extension pack (it contains the extension Language Support for Java(TM) by Red Hat that gives the information you're looking for when hovering over Java code):
Make sure to also have tooltips enabled. You can read about enabling them here.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install rust-analyzer
Rust is installed and managed by the rustup tool. Rust has a 6-week rapid release process and supports a great number of platforms, so there are many builds of Rust available at any time. Please refer rust-lang.org for more information.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page