kandi X-RAY | workflows Summary
kandi X-RAY | workflows Summary
Opinionated workflows built on top of Carthage. Replaces Carthage checkouts with symlinks pointed inside the parent directory (..), useful for developing dependencies in coordination with the parent project, while avoiding the need for submodules. Verifies that the commitish values in the Cartfile.resolved file are in sync with the commitish values in the Carthage/Build/*.version files. Can be added to an Xcode project as a "run script" build phase to prevent developers from building the project with carthage-built frameworks that are out of sync with the contents of the Cartfile.resolved. This occurs because the Carthage/Build folder is typically ignored in version control, and a developer may have a stale contents in their local checkout from the last time they ran a carthage bootstrap. Similar in behavior to the CocoaPods Manifest.lock file.
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
workflows Key Features
workflows Examples and Code Snippets
Trending Discussions on workflows
I have run many times github actions on my repo without problem and with the same script on one of my repo it is displaying “no status”. The repo is: https://github.com/aurelpere/python-planif I dont understand why it is not displaying a status as the workflow runs correctly… Any help would be great thank you
notice my svg badge also shows "no status" at https://github.com/aurelpere/python-planif/workflows/CI/badge.svg and at https://github.com/aurelpere/python-planif/workflows/Unittests/badge.svg . (following what is in this post : https://github.community/t/badge-shows-no-status-and-no-status-mismatch-between-the-filepath-vs-name-usage/16907 or in this post Github Actions badge shows "No status")
I also tried to duplicate the code in another fresh repo (https://github.com/aurelpere/python-geothermal---power-to-gas/ ) and it is the same, the badge shows no status, so it has nothing to do with the fast forward merge issue from here https://github.community/t/workflow-badge-no-status/17280/2
Edit : solved with the answer below, but i deleted the initial repo and kept only the fresh one if you try to follow the links...
ANSWERAnswered 2022-Apr-17 at 11:25
For some reason you have to use the workflow name instead of the yaml file name. This worked for me
I was recently told that running
docker-compose with sudo is a big nono, and that I had to create/add my user to the
docker group in order to run
docker-compose commands without
sudo. Which I did, as per the documentation here
docker runs normally via my user. e.g. :
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Nov-23 at 21:31
sudo chmod a+x /usr/local/bin/docker-compose
This error is popping-up intermittently while trying to deploy my github webpages. I have no clue what to do, I already deleted and recreated the repository but the error persists. I have the same problem for all my github pages repositories.
Here is one repository example: https://github.com/cnftstats/borgs...
ANSWERAnswered 2022-Mar-18 at 17:45
[It was a bug of GitHub, happens to all its users---date: 18/03/2022]
It happens to me today too.. :(
Maybe is a bug of GitHub pages: https://github.com/actions/deploy-pages/issues/22
I have been using github actions for quite sometime but today my deployments started failing. Below is the error from github action logs...
ANSWERAnswered 2022-Mar-16 at 07:01
First, this error message is indeed expected on Jan. 11th, 2022.
See "Improving Git protocol security on GitHub".
January 11, 2022 Final brownout.
This is the full brownout period where we’ll temporarily stop accepting the deprecated key and signature types, ciphers, and MACs, and the unencrypted Git protocol.
This will help clients discover any lingering use of older keys or old URLs.
For GitHub Actions:
There was a 4-month warning.
The entire Internet has been moving away from unauthenticated, unencrypted protocols for a decade, it's not like this is a huge surprise.
Personally, I consider it less an "issue" and more "detecting unmaintained dependencies".
Plus, this is still only the brownout period, so the protocol will only be disabled for a short period of time, allowing developers to discover the problem.
The permanent shutdown is not until March 15th.
As in actions/checkout issue 14, you can add as a first step:
I am trying to connect to a Spark cluster on Databricks and I am following this tutorial: https://docs.databricks.com/dev-tools/dbt.html. And I have the
dbt-databricks connector installed (https://github.com/databricks/dbt-databricks). However, no matter how I configure it, I keep getting "Database error, failed to connect" when I run
dbt test /
This is my
ANSWERAnswered 2022-Feb-21 at 13:12
I had not specified this in the original question, but I had used
conda to set up a virtual environment. Somehow that doesn't work, so I'd recommend following the tutorial to the letter and use
Initially, I deployed my React app (created with create-react-app) to Github Pages and it works fine. However, after a few changes to the
src files, I wanted to update the website so I decided to re-deploy the app using
npm run deploy and it finishes with
Published being printed at the end of the command. On Github, the actions shows that the build is successful, but it's not able to deploy, giving me an error code of 400.
Complete error log from Github is as follow:...
ANSWERAnswered 2022-Mar-17 at 06:37
I haven't found a solution, but I have a workaround. If you go to the last working workflow run in the
Actions tab (look for a green checkmark), you can click
Re-run all jobs, which should deploy your webpage for you, including the latest changes.
Hope this works for the time being until there is a better solution!
I am encountering a strange behaviour with GitHub Action
Basically, everything works fine after the initial setup, but when I edit the input parameters of the workflow files it does not use the updated values. Hard to explain in words, so let me show you an example.
Consider this basic setup:
(The entire example is available here: https://github.com/mbongard/workflow-call-issue)
ANSWERAnswered 2022-Mar-13 at 16:48
According to the documentation: "When a workflow is triggered with the
workflow_call event, the event payload in the called workflow is the same event payload from the calling workflow." In other words, the
event parameter in the
github context is the same for the called workflow as for the original workflow.
Consequently, there is no
github.event.input.some_other_value parameter since the original workflow did not have this input. For inputs defined in a reusable workflow you can use the
inputs context which contains the input properties passed to the reusable workflow.
To sum up, here is a working sub-workflow.yml file:
Github Actions were working in my repository till yesterday. I didnt make any changes in .github/workflows/dev.yml file or in DockerFile.
But, suddenly in recent pushes, my Github Actions fail with the error
Setup, Build, Publish, and Deploy...
ANSWERAnswered 2021-Jul-27 at 13:24
I fixed it by changing
uses value to
I would like to limit concurrency to one run for my workflow:...
ANSWERAnswered 2022-Feb-06 at 21:23
I am using this concurrency key for my workflows in similar case:
I'm trying to publish a npm package on GAR (Google Artifact Registry) through github using
For the authentication to google from github here is what I did to use the Federation Workload Identity:...
ANSWERAnswered 2022-Feb-11 at 12:44
I finally find out !!! BUT I'm not sure in term of security if there is any risk or not so if anyone can advice I'll edit the answer !
What is changing but I'm not sure in term of security is here :
No vulnerabilities reported
Reuse Trending Solutions
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page