dev-machine | Ansible setup for maintaining a development environment | DevOps library
kandi X-RAY | dev-machine Summary
kandi X-RAY | dev-machine Summary
Ansible setup for maintaining a development environment
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of dev-machine
dev-machine Key Features
dev-machine Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on dev-machine
QUESTION
Good morning
I am having a problem with my terraform code. I have defined two gcp compute instances in the following way inside a specific module:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jul-29 at 14:38According to the plan output, the argument value forcing a replacement is:
QUESTION
I have a simple .NET core/.NET 5 API that returns some data via OData and some Data via "traditional" endpoints though all in the same controller inheriting ODataController.
When I'm starting the project with IIS Express from Visual Studio 2019 and hit http://dev-machine/swagger, I get the expected SwaggerUI-output for my API.
If I deploy it to a docker container, I can still get to my API endpoints and to /swagger/v1/swagger.json and to the SwaggerUI at /swagger.
As soon as I put that thing behind a traefik router, I'm no longer able to get to /swagger, but /swagger/v1/swagger.json still works.
I'm at a loss here and don't know where to start - so: if anyone could point me in the right direction, that'd be greatly appreciated!
My docker-compose.yaml for the project:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-30 at 13:12Finally found my mistake(s)...
I ended up defining explicit Traefik routers and associated rules for the files needed by SwaggerUI as well as detailing the SwaggerEndpoint (at app.UseSwaggerUI()). Now everything is working as expected.
Relevant parts of traefik config:
QUESTION
I have a Pulumi - program which works fine on my Dev-Machine. Configuarion is stored in Azure, also the Resources created are being stored in Azure.
To run this I set the following environment variables:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-19 at 13:27There are two options to configure Pulumi to authenticate with a Service Principal:
Set the environment variables
ARM_CLIENT_ID
,ARM_CLIENT_SECRET
,ARM_TENANT_ID
, andARM_SUBSCRIPTION_ID
, orSet them using configuration
QUESTION
Following This guide from Liquibase's official website I've created my own changelog-master.xml
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-11 at 12:15What was causing the issue I was having was the fact that in my changelog-master.xml
I had an outdated XSD version, which was causing something to break into the XML Parser. To fix it I've changed it with the following:
QUESTION
This query shall get all products with a price reduction exceeding 30%:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-24 at 09:43The reason is the _parseCondition
method of QueryExpression
class. It will assume everything after the first space to be the operator and use strtolower
on it, thus making the alias lower-case.
This can be easily mitigated by removing all spaces from the expression like this:
QUESTION
We latelly encountered a problem on our project while trying to make a subprocess pipe a whole base64 encoded picture (around 355K) to it's parent process : but pictures seemed randomly truncated and we still don't get this behaviour nor found a solution.
We found a workaround to transmit these pictures with tempfile based communication, but we still wanna understand the problem about these inter-process communication limitations.
Here is the closest minimum and reproductible example we succeeded to produce that highlights this behaviour, we have a python script that tries to retrieve the data from a node subprocess that generates the data to retrieve. But the length of data the parent process is able to get seems limited in a nondeterministic way.
This example tests the equality between the requested data length and the actual retrieved length.
- test.py :
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jan-15 at 18:33The problem is in your JavaScript code and you can find the explanation here :
Calling
process.exit()
will force the process to exit as quickly as possible even if there are still asynchronous operations pending that have not yet completed fully, including I/O operations toprocess.stdout
andprocess.stderr
.
and :
In most situations, it is not actually necessary to call
process.exit()
explicitly. The Node.js process will exit on its own if there is no additional work pending in the event loop. Theprocess.exitCode
property can be set to tell the process which exit code to use when the process exits gracefully.
You are calling process.exit()
before the call to process.stdout.write()
has completed (writing to pipes is asynchronous on POSIX). This causes the JS process to exit prematurely, and interrupts the writing before all the data has been written.
If you want to set the error code, you should set process.exitCode = errorCode
as you do and allow the event loop to end gracefully without calling process.exit()
.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install dev-machine
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page