VPN | Personal VPN using Shadowsocks and v2ray | VPN library

I am running currently a webserver with ASP.NET Core 3.1 and a Blazor project. Recently when upgrading to .NET 6.0 I encountered (even with a blank Blazor project) some problems with a websocket error message in the browser only when deployed on my webserver (see message below).

Locally (on Windows 11 x64, VS 22 Preview 4) there are no error messages...

Webserver: Debian 10 x64, .NET 6.0 SDK installed, running on NGINX with websockets enabled (reverse proxy).

Do I miss out on something or is it a problem with the current state of .NET 6.0 and NGINX? I already tried to access the webpage locally on the debian server and the same error message occurs.

Help would be much appreciated!

Greetings!

Error messages within order:

I am attempting to create and validate an AWS Certificate using Terraform by following the example from the Terraform documentation here: https://registry.terraform.io/providers/hashicorp/aws/latest/docs/resources/acm_certificate_validation#dns-validation-with-route-53

My Terraform file looks like:

I want to select value by text from a dynamic non select dropdown. I did some research and I found this code:

We have setup a GKE cluster using Terraform with private and shared networking:

Network configuration:

When I tried build Unity project for Android, it reported "Gradle build failed". I tried using VPN and using another repository(based in China where the Gradle connection is not working well), but still the same errors.

I checked the log(see following), one line says it tries to "Connect to 192.168.1.4:1125 [/192.168.1.4]", which seems suspicious. My building PC is 192.168.1.2, and it's connected directly to a fiber optic modem, which is 192.168.1.1. The 192.168.1.4 is another wifi modem connected to the fiber optic modem, and it should has nothing to do with my PC's internet connection.

Why does Unity try connecting a device that's not related when building Gradle? Any suggestions on how to solve this building failure? Thank you!

We are currently running an unsecured Kafka setup on AWS MSK (so I don't have access to most config files directly and need to use the kafka-cli) and are looking into ways to add protection. Setting up TLS & SASL is easy, though as our Kafka cluster is behind a VPN and already has restricted access does not add more security.

We want to start with the most important and in our opinion quick win security addition. Protect topics from being deleted (and created) by all users. We currently have allow.everyone.if.no.acl.found set to true.

All I find on Google or Stack Overflow shows me how I can restrict users from reading/writing to other topics than they have access to. Though Ideally that is not what we want to implement as a first step.

I have found things about a root-user (Is an admin user, though was called root in all tutorials I read). Though the examples I have found don't show examples of adding an ACL to this root user to make it the only one accessible, the topic deletion/creation.

Can you please explain how to create a user that, and block all other users?

By the way, we also don't use zookeeper, even though an MSK-cluster ads this per default. And hope we can do this without adding zookeeper actively to our stack. The answer given here hardly relies on zookeeper. Also, this answer points to the topic read/write examples only, even though the question was the same as I am asking

i try to use python requests library but i got this error i use psiphon VPN most of time in Windows 10 and got this below error after calling requests.get('[API URL]')

I actually have following situation:

I successfully reach host C from Host A using VPN static routes. I need now to reach it from host B. I thought to create a route table from VPC B that forward request with ip/32 of host C through Peering connection... But it doesn't work.

There is a way to do that?

N.B. I cannot use Transit Gateway

Thanks!

I'm using an SMS sending service provided by a local mobile carrier. The carrier enforces clients to connect to their datacentre over a VPN in order to reach their endpoints. The VPN tunnel must always be kept open (i.e. not on demand).

Currently, I'm using a micro EC2 instance that acts as middleware between my main production server (also an EC2 instance) and the carrier endpoint.

Production Server --> My SMS Server --over VPN--> Carrier SMS Server

Is there a way to replace my middleware server with an AWS Lambda function that sends HTTP requests to the carrier over an always-on VPN tunnel?

Also, can an AWS Lambda function maintain a static IP? The carrier has to place my IP in their whitelist before I can use their service.