rebase | GitHub Action to automatically rebase PRs | Continous Integration library

by cirrus-actions Shell Version: 1.6 License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(10)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | rebase Summary

rebase is a Shell library typically used in Devops, Continous Integration applications. rebase has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

After installation simply comment /rebase to trigger the action:.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

rebase has a low active ecosystem.

It has 557 star(s) with 121 fork(s). There are 11 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

There are 21 open issues and 31 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 25 days. There are 4 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of rebase is 1.6

Quality

rebase has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

rebase has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

rebase code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

rebase is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

rebase releases are available to install and integrate.

Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of rebase

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

rebase Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for rebase.

rebase Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for rebase.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on rebase

does --quit leave you with a clean index and worktree after a rebase or a cherry-pick operation?

How can I restore the git history of a fork where the history was deleted?

Can't connect dbt to Databricks

What it mean when your pull request is okay but are asked to "rebase this on master?" After which the owner will merge it

Git Merge Fast-Forward vs Git Rebase

Git: How to skip to the end of a rebase and keep all changes so far?

Problems when writing parquet with timestamps prior to 1900 in AWS Glue 3.0

Perl Exec/System passing parameter

Github actions decline action if fails

Support for password authentication was removed on August 13, 2021

QUESTION

does --quit leave you with a clean index and worktree after a rebase or a cherry-pick operation?

Asked 2022-Apr-14 at 23:00

I know that --quit does not change your HEAD pointer, so any commits made successfully during a rebase or cherrypick are still there.

But what I'm unsure of is, in case a conflict happened during a cherry-pick or a rebase, whether using --quit clear the changes brought about by the conflict, such as the successfully added changes, the conflict markers in the working directory, the multiple versions in the index etc ?

The git rebase documentation has the following:

--quit Abort the rebase operation but HEAD is not reset back to the original branch. The index and working tree are also left unchanged as a result.

the cherry-pick documentation is less clear about the effects on the index and work tree:

--quit Forget about the current operation in progress. Can be used to clear the sequencer state after a failed cherry-pick or revert.

But this otherwise excellent answer in SO has the following:

But if you choose --quit, Git terminates the rebase without moving HEAD, so that you wind up with:

but a clean index and work-tree. So you don't have to be clever enough to attach a branch name before the --quit.

So which is it ? I know that in a merge --quit will not clear the mess that a merge conflict makes in your index and work tree, it just abandons the merge head state. is it different in case of a cherry pick or a rebase ?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Apr-14 at 23:00

It really depends on the state you had at the time you issue the --quit: Git just stops here. I'll update the other answer to indicate that you can then git reset --hard to make it "clean" if you want, or leave it "dirty" if you want.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71876806

QUESTION

How can I restore the git history of a fork where the history was deleted?

Asked 2022-Apr-09 at 17:37

I have a project with hundreds of commits. It is a fork of another open-source project. At the time the fork was created, the git history was wiped. Now I want to reattach the history.

The original project has thousands of commits, call them: A <- B <- C <- D

Meanwhile, our fork has: E <- F <- G <- H

The branches do not share any common ancestors, but commit D and E have exactly the same filesystem. When E was created, the git history was wiped.

How can I reattach them without solving merge conflicts?

Solutions I've tried:

git cherry-pick fork/initial..fork/develop - I tried cherry-picking changes from the fork onto the original repo, but this resulted in merge conflicts. This solution tries to replay the commits linearly, but with all of the branching and merges that happened, there are merge conflicts all along the way.
git rebase -i fork/initial fork/develop~0 --onto new-branch - Rebasing instead of cherry-picking unfortunately has the same problem as above. It tries to replay the commits in order, leading to merge conflicts. I also tried with --rebase-merges to no avail.
git merge fork/develop --allow-unrelated-histories -- This is the closest to what I want. It still resulted in a ton of merge conflicts (for reasons I don't understand?) but I resolved them all at once with git checkout fork/develop -- . and git commit. The problem with this solution is the "initial commit" of the fork branch is still the oldest commit to touch every file, so I am not getting any of the benefits of consolidating these branches.

All the solutions I’ve encountered so far require me to resolve conflicts. This should not be required, since I am trying to attach histories at a point where the filesystems are identical.

I just want to reattach the history to where it came from. Any ideas?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Apr-09 at 17:37

You can try this

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71801465

QUESTION

Can't connect dbt to Databricks

Asked 2022-Mar-23 at 14:59

I am trying to connect to a Spark cluster on Databricks and I am following this tutorial: https://docs.databricks.com/dev-tools/dbt.html. And I have the dbt-databricks connector installed (https://github.com/databricks/dbt-databricks). However, no matter how I configure it, I keep getting "Database error, failed to connect" when I run dbt test / dbt debug.

This is my profiles.yaml:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Feb-21 at 13:12

I had not specified this in the original question, but I had used conda to set up a virtual environment. Somehow that doesn't work, so I'd recommend following the tutorial to the letter and use pipenv.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71020949

QUESTION

What it mean when your pull request is okay but are asked to "rebase this on master?" After which the owner will merge it

Asked 2022-Mar-23 at 07:55

Your pull request is approved by someone with write permissions, and they respond "can you rebase this on master? I'll merge it after."

What would be the steps using git, if that simplifies things. Or any step involving Visual Studio and even GitHub Desktop.

git rebase master
git commit -m "rebased to master"
git push

Is that what he meant? And why would my fork need to be rebased? I can't possibly rebase his repo.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Mar-23 at 07:55

You must first to reference the target repository, assuming your PR comes from a fork:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71583424

QUESTION

Git Merge Fast-Forward vs Git Rebase

Asked 2022-Feb-22 at 14:06

What is the difference between a fast-forwarded git merge and a git rebase? Don't both accomplish keeping history linear and no merge commits? If so, why would one use one over the other? If not, which is what I think is true, what is the whole story that I'm not seeing?

Thanks!

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Feb-22 at 14:06

When you are ahead of master, both do the same thing.

If you're ahead and behind master, then a fast-forward merge isn't possible, since there are newer commits on master. But in that case, you can rebase, creating new commits based on the commits that are ahead of master.

When you're ahead of master:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70627750

QUESTION

Git: How to skip to the end of a rebase and keep all changes so far?

Asked 2022-Feb-22 at 07:19

I'm in the middle of an interactive rebase and I've already amended several commits.

I have several remaining commits that I've marked to edit, but I've decided that I don't want to edit them anymore.

How can I end the rebase (early, if you would) but keep the changes I've made so far?

git rebase --abort will end the rebase and erase all of the changes I've made, and git rebase --continue is too tedious to type for every remaining commit I have to edit. 🤷

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Feb-22 at 07:19

You can run:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71216672

QUESTION

Problems when writing parquet with timestamps prior to 1900 in AWS Glue 3.0

Asked 2022-Feb-10 at 13:45

When switching from Glue 2.0 to 3.0, which means also switching from Spark 2.4 to 3.1.1, my jobs start to fail when processing timestamps prior to 1900 with this error:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Feb-10 at 13:45

I made it work by setting --conf to spark.sql.legacy.parquet.int96RebaseModeInRead=CORRECTED --conf spark.sql.legacy.parquet.int96RebaseModeInWrite=CORRECTED --conf spark.sql.legacy.parquet.datetimeRebaseModeInRead=CORRECTED --conf spark.sql.legacy.parquet.datetimeRebaseModeInWrite=CORRECTED.

This is a workaround though and Glue Dev team is working on a fix, although there is no ETA.

Also this is still very buggy. You can not call .show() on a DynamicFrame for example, you need to call it on a DataFrame. Also all my jobs failed where I call data_frame.rdd.isEmpty(), don't ask me why.

Update 24.11.2021: I reached out to the Glue Dev Team and they told me that this is the intended way of fixing it. There is a workaround that can be done inside of the script though:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68891312

QUESTION

Perl Exec/System passing parameter

Asked 2022-Jan-24 at 18:05

I have an issue with the perl (v5.26.3) commands system or exec (both have the same behaviour)

Both command work fine

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Jan-22 at 00:54

For the system invocation that takes a list we need to pass it the command broken into words

If there is more than one argument in LIST, or if LIST is an array with more than one value, starts the program given by the first element of the list with arguments given by the rest of the list. If there is only one scalar argument, the argument is checked for shell metacharacters, and if there are any, the entire argument is passed to the system's command shell for parsing (this is /bin/sh -c on Unix platforms, but varies on other platforms). If there are no shell metacharacters in the argument, it is split into words and passed directly to execvp, ...

(my emphasis) ^†

Let's look at a trivial example. Take a command like

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70798866

QUESTION

Github actions decline action if fails

Asked 2022-Jan-17 at 16:55

I'm trying to use the github actions for first time, I've created and followed the tutorial from github and my .github/workflows/push_main.yml is :

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Jan-17 at 16:55

There is a super convenient way to build, test and aggregate the outcome of changes of some branch before merging using pull requests.

Its common to create a pull request and trigger a workflow doing the checks. Just add "pull_request:" to reuse your existing workflow, to build and test your changes.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70687933

QUESTION

Support for password authentication was removed on August 13, 2021

Asked 2022-Jan-13 at 02:58

Over a long period of time I am using tortoise git, today I am not able to use the tortoise git and getting the below error.

git.exe pull --progress -v --no-rebase "origin" remote: Support for password authentication was removed on August 13, 2021. Please use a personal access token instead. remote: Please see https://github.blog/2020-12-15-token-authentication-requirements-for-git-operations/ for more information.

I am using the latest tortoise git version.

I understand what is the git latest change. But I want to use tortoise git. Someone, please help me out this issue.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Aug-19 at 03:18

Github Has Revoked the support for password authentication on 13 Aug 2021 and giving the below mentioned response:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68781928

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install rebase

To configure the action simply add the following lines to your .github/workflows/rebase.yml workflow file:. NOTE: To ensure GitHub Actions is automatically re-run after a successful rebase action use a Personal Access Token for actions/checkout@v2 and cirrus-actions/rebase@1.4. See the following discussion for more details.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: