sbtest | Simple library for bash script unit | Unit Testing library
kandi X-RAY | sbtest Summary
kandi X-RAY | sbtest Summary
Simple library for bash script unit testing with mocks and asserts.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of sbtest
sbtest Key Features
sbtest Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on sbtest
QUESTION
I'm trying to make a job that runs sysbench on a pod. First I make the job with the next yaml:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-05 at 21:32You're trying to run a linux/amd64 image on an ARM-based system: essentially, the error is saying that doesn't understand how to run instructions since binary and processor are speaking different languages.
You have to find a compatible Docker image for your architecture.
QUESTION
I'm building a fairly large JSON dictionary where I specify a few uuids like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-16 at 19:18Cast it to a string instead of using a uuid.UUID
object:
QUESTION
The question is in the comment. I want to refer to the outer function append
, and not the one that's defined in the StringBuilder
, how do I do this?
ANSWER
Answered 2018-Sep-02 at 18:34The problem is that anything called within with
shadows the outer functions, because this
is introduced. The same problem appears if you have a class and a top-level function with a function with the same signature.
The obvious option would just be re-naming it. Also, the function you have there isn't really descriptive compared to what it actually does. But if you for some reason can't rename, there are still other options.
Top-level methods can be referenced by package in Kotlin, for an instance like com.some.package.method
. It can also be imported as such, which is the most common way to do it. There are very few methods that are called as com.some.package.method()
.
Kotlin, like Python, allows as
in imports. Which means, you can do this:
QUESTION
I have a backup procedure (production) running daily on a schedule and the backups generated are used periodically to refresh the lower environments. I'm building an automated solution to download .bak files to lower environments (different server). I'm reluctant to use MIRROR TO option in backup as it may effect the normal backup operation if something fails in mirror to . I here want to use service broker and asynchronously trigger file copy from prod to lower environment at the end of the backup procedure. I've had put lot of effort in understanding service broker , message type, service , queue and contract. Everything's fine until here. Now I just want to understand on how to trigger filecopy procedure with some custom logic at the end of backup using service broker. I've played around with the following script to understand service broker. Someone kindly guide me on how to build a solution out of this.
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Sep-13 at 10:38The Triggering occurs using "Internal Activation". You need to create a stored procedure that will be triggered when a message enters the queue, reads from the queue, then does the work. Adapted from the link:
QUESTION
Looking for best approach to optimize the calculations below.
It retrieves a list of dates in the database and then for each date Takes the portfolio, calculate the performance contribution of each asset in the portfolio by retrieving weight and prices in the database.
Aside building a cache to reduce number of db access and adding relevant indexes in the database. Is there something I can do to reduce significantly the time it takes to perform the calculations ? Is there components in the framework helping to work in an efficient manner ?
Currently this takes about 200s to complete with professional class DB (average access time between 1ms and 2ms)
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Mar-10 at 13:51In the first place you're using a Linq in order to make a Join from Date of Portefolio to MarketPlace of Ticker of the related Portefolio and then applying a function to the later. I see two way to improve your solution.
Number 1 : Going for a SQL solution. To my mind redesigning a proper JOIN query without Linq is the most efficient way to do it.
Number 2 : Going for a .NET solution. You may also want to make this JOIN as a .NET table in order to query it and use it.
Not knowing your SQL architecture nor your .NET architecture I can't help you with examples.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install sbtest
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page