shunt | Simple Shell Unit Testing Framework | Unit Testing library

I have a word document with three tables inside it (like the one below), which I need to sort by the hour presented inside each line on the first column (the first time reference encountered). If I apply a blind sort, like:

ActiveDocument.Tables(1).Sort ExcludeHeader:= true, SortOrder:=wdSortOrderAscending

on a table which begins not by the time reference but with some words other them the time, this type of sorting will not work as I need. It will only take in consideration the first word found in each line. Can anyone have some idea on how to solve this problem? For the purpose of an example, consider a table like this:

Descrição

HEADER1 HEADER2 Às 11.00 iniciou.se a do Gr.# da NNN. F Às 16.18 iniciou-se a do Gr.# da FFF. G Das 07.05 às 16.57 a Bateria de Condensadores # da CCC. K Das 07.22 às 16.24 a do disjuntor IBBP de 400 kV da KKK. D Das 08.10 às 16.58 a do disjuntor # do módulo ## do PPPPP. Y Das 08.27 às 17.34 a do disjuntor IBBP de 220 kV da LLLL. S Das 09.00 iniciou-se a do Gr.# da JJ. H Das 10.00 às 14.59 os Gr.#, Gr.# e Gr.# da VVV. R Das 10.04 às 19.16 a Reactância Shunt da GGGG. H Das 14.00 às 15.23 o Gr.# e das 14.00 às 16.11 o Gr.# da HHH. U Das 14.00 às 16.55 o Gr.# da MMM. A

So I don't know the word by which will each line begins, but I need to ignore them during the sort process. Can I do this with some vba for a word document (docm)?

...

I am working with pvlib.singlediode.calcparams_desoto and I am confused by the following.

In his original masters thesis De Soto proposes equation 4.21 (Page 46) to correct the series resistance for the given irradiation and temperature. However, in the source of calcparams_desoto, the series resistance is not modified, altough irradiation and temperature can have a significant impact on the series resistance (See Figures 4.18 and 4.19, Page 49).

Furthermore, the shunt resistance is corrected for different effective irradiation in the implementation pf pvlib. However, De Soto suggests, that there is no significant impact of irradiation on the shunt resistance (See Equation 4.33, Page 73). After searching the paper for some time, I wasn't able to find another place where this is explained.

What is the reason for those two things being implemented like this?

Thank you very much for your answers!

The page numbers referenced are the actual page numbers of the thesis and not those of the pdf.

...

I get the following errors when I run the es-crawler.flux topology. I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. I don't think theres are yaml errors?

...

I'm trying to run python 3 scripts as part of a Makefile target that can be used on Linux or Windows (msys). What is the correct way it invoke Python 3 when the system may also have Python 2.7 installed?

It seems that:

• python script.py doesn't work, because on systems that have Python 2.7 installed, that points at the 2.7 version.

• python3 script.py doesn't work, because if you only have Python 3 installed it names the executable python.exe on Windows.

• py -3 script.py doesn't work on Linux because the py shunt only exists on Windows.

Is there a good example out there of how to do this correctly?

...

I'm a python beginner, and I've studied lately data structures in Python, namely, lists, tuples, dictionaries, all that jazz. Now, as a little learning excercise, I'd like to write an infix-to-postfix converter using the Shunting Yard Algorithm. Now, I've written this program before in C, and there, to get the operator priority, I only defined a function that returned the priority of the token using a switch statement. Here, I'm at a loss, because switch statements don't exist. The ugly solution would be to do the same, but with elif statements, that's my last resort, but, is there a more elegant solution using dictionaries?

For now, my dictionary looks like this:

priorities = {1: ('+', '-'), 2: ('*', '/'), 3: '^'}

As you can see, multiple operators have the same priority, my question is, how can I know the priority of any given token using this structure? If my token is '^' that's easy, just priorities['^'], but if it's any other operator? How can I associate them with the tuple that contains it? something like priorities['+']?

...

I am trying to implement Dijkstra's shunting yard algorithm to python because it would be a good exercise. However even though my code works properly for some test cases. It doesn't work properly for some of them.

In my specific case it doesn't work properly after the place I showed in the picture: screenshot

Here is my code:

...

For a Symfony 4 project we need to make a large inpection form about surfaces with many fields. We're looking for the approach how to organize the structure and relationships and keep load speed in mind.

I've created the basic entity example below, which is still simple to be stored in one database table. The fields below are simple relations or string fields so a InspectionType would be easy.

...

I have a multi-column div (2-4 columns depending on a setting in my app) generated live by user-provided markdown in a text editor. In some cases, they want to manually insert column breaks. To achieve this, I provide a Markdown snippet that generates a div with the CSS property break-after: column to manually trigger column breaks. It works fine if it is set to display: block. However, if the user then inserts a div that spans both columns (with CSS column-span: all), that column-spanning element gets shunted to below its containing element, and any further text disappears entirely, as follows (in the latest version of Chrome, specifically):

...

I've been trying to solve this for hours and cannot get to a solution.

I use equations which I define inside a class. These equations depend on constants, which I've defined as variables. My ultimate goal is to be able to change and iterate one of the constants and as such update the equations which are dependent on these constants (variable).

As an example:

...