pull-request | ⤵️ A GitHub Action for creating pull requests | Continous Integration library
kandi X-RAY | pull-request Summary
kandi X-RAY | pull-request Summary
A GitHub Action for creating pull requests.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of pull-request
pull-request Key Features
pull-request Examples and Code Snippets
Lines of Code : 5License : Permissive (MIT License)
Copydef get_files_url() -> str:
"""Return the pull request number which triggered this action."""
with open(os.environ["GITHUB_EVENT_PATH"]) as file:
event = json.load(file)
return event["pull_request"]["url"] + "/files" Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on pull-request
QUESTION
Could someone help me out here. I'm completely confused on how to solve this. I've now spent about a week trying to find a solution for this but have come up short and there appears to be a lack of a solid solution online. I've made a github repository trying to demonstrate the issue.
In short I've implemented a status bar in my application which i want to populate with various string messages. These messages would be sent from functions that are contained inside a js file that imports electron, which mean's it doesn't have direct access to the Renderer. So how would I send these messages to the Renderer. I'm assuming this needs to be done using the ContextBridge, but i have no clue how to successfully do this, so if your response is just linking me to the context bridge docs, don't bother, lol I've exhausted myself looking at that. The other alternative i was considering is using a custom event but but i'm not sure that would solve the problem either.
Here is a sample of what im trying to do along with repo on github. If you do a pull-request to fix the repo, ill gladly merge and keep the repo public for others to benefit from and share with the community. https://github.com/JokerMartini/statusbar
As a minor problem, im not sure why i can no longer call getPath from 'app' from within a js file that's not loaded into the render thread.
I trigger a method from Renderer
index.vue
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-22 at 07:29You want to be using ipcMain (in the main process) and ipcRenderer (in the renderer process). If you compare your scripts to the examples at https://www.electronjs.org/docs/latest/tutorial/ipc that is what is missing.
(There is a section specifically on doing main to renderer.)
This did use to be clearer and simpler, but carried more potential for abuse. So best to ignore any online tutorials older than a year or so. (Though contextBridge is quite new, so if they mention it then they should be recent.)
QUESTION
I have forked a github repository and by now my fork is several commits ahead. I now want to provide one of these commits as a PR to the original repository.
Following this question's answer, I did:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-21 at 16:36You got the following error message:
QUESTION
I am using l5-swagger and redocly to display API documentation for a Laravel 8 project.
Open API supports:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-30 at 10:43x- properties are supported in swagger-php, those properties are not part of the openapi spec and are referred to as vendor extensions.
https://zircote.github.io/swagger-php/Getting-started.html#vendor-extensions
QUESTION
So I understand that once I open a pull request, I automatically get a code review for the code that's about to be merged, that's great! But is there a a way to create a Code review without creating a Pull Request? For example, let's say I am working on a feature and I would like to do a code review with peers, but I don't want to do a Pull Request as the feature is still Work In Progress.
I understand that I can use the "compare" feature in BitBucket to see the code diff, but I needed the "Codereview" kind of feature explicitly so that I can:
Share the code review link with my peers so that they can see it
They can comment and open "tasks" on the code
and all of it while not creating a Pull Request. Is that possible?
Question is already asked here.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-28 at 08:04The usual process is to start code review based on a pull-request (this is how I understand the usage in BitBucket).
It is acceptable to create the pull-request and mark it as in progress and you can always add more commits on the PR later. This is explained in the official doc:
But, the pull request is more than just a notification—it’s a dedicated forum for discussing the proposed feature. If there are any problems with the changes, teammates can post feedback in the pull request and even tweak the feature by pushing follow-up commits. All of this activity is tracked directly inside of the pull request.
Your peers must be aware that you don't need immediate approval but just comments until you finish the feature (PR ready to be merged)
QUESTION
As per API documentation https://docs.github.com/en/rest/reference/pulls#create-a-review-for-a-pull-request
We can use a CURL to approve pull request i.e.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-25 at 13:22After bit of experiments, it has worked with API /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pull_number}/reviews
I must say that Github documentation is very poor that I have to spend almost 3 hours to figure this out. A small but proper CURL would have helped in a few seconds and would have saved my time.
Anyway, leaving this solution on StackOverflow so that, this helps other people and saves their precious time.
CURL:
QUESTION
I have created Workflow for GitHub Actions as described here: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/supply-chain-security/keeping-your-dependencies-updated-automatically/automating-dependabot-with-github-actions
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-20 at 09:46As of right now, a GitHub app cannot be added to CODEOWNERS as quoted here.
Thank you for being here! Currently, GitHub Apps can’t be used in CODEOWNERS – that’s not supported. It’s something the team is considering for the future, and I’ll be sure to add your use case to the internal feature request.
However, what you can do, is to use a GitHub personal access token generated by yourself as explained in the documentation here, then add it as a secret and use it in your workflow. See the GitHub Documentation .
The last step of your action would then reference your self-defined secret. In the below example, I assume it's called MYTOKEN
QUESTION
I am doing data analysis on GitHub projects and I want to filter projects having continuous integration (on GitHub).
There are two types of checks and statuses on GitHub: Checks and Statuses! Projects can use GitHub Apps to run checks or mark their commits with external services (CI or other) [source]. My question here is: does having GitHub Checks (or statuses) results available for a project mean that the project is using CI for sure? If not what other factors should be presented to say a project is having continuous integration?
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-14 at 12:36Possibly. But you can't be sure. It means that some check runs and some status is updated. But without looking at the automation, there is no way to conclude that Continuous integration takes place.
Maybe it checks whether the contributor has signed a contribution agreement. Maybe it checks for the presence of a Issue id or an attachment. Maybe it updated some external system (like Service Now) so the issue can be tracked there as well...
Checks and statuses are used in many different ways.
And Continuous Integration looks different for different technologies. Some languages need to be compiled, others won't need that. They'd hopefully have some kind of tests to validate nothing broke during integration, but there is no surefire way to know as it may simply be running a script or using a test framework or something else.
You can probably easily conclude that the absence of checks and statuses likely means that CI isn't being performed (even that can't be said with 100% certainty as an external system may be performing the CI, just not reporting back the status). The presence if checks and statuses means that something happens. But you likely need to dig a bit deeper to classify whether the thing that happens constitutes to CI.
QUESTION
I want to make a pull request from a react-native app. I am using the octokit-plugin-create-pull-request library from here. They have a function octokit.createPullRequest() in their documentation. I am at a point where I need to know the datatype of the value it returns. Is it an array or an object? Or is it another datatype?
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-12 at 18:59It returns a pull request object, with the properties you see in the example response https://docs.github.com/en/rest/reference/pulls#create-a-pull-request.
QUESTION
I have been trying to understand how to get a multi-line comment written to a PR using github actions. I was trying to use github.rest.issues.createComment() as shown in Commenting a pull request... and then handling the multi-line issue by using an environmement variable as shown here: workflow commands. Ultimate goal is to take some multi-line output stdout from a python script (or a log file) and place that as a comment back to the PR that the workflow is running on. The yml file below runs fine up until the last step where I try to access the environment variable I created and use it as the body of the createComment(). The environment variable is created and appears to be available but fails when I try to use it for the body of the comment. Error from github actions is below the code. If I add quotes like body: "${{env.SCRIPT_OUTPUT}}" then I get same error. I would like to use createComment() if possible, I know there is a create comment from Peter Evans that I will likely try next but trying to understand why this is not working.
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-10 at 15:56The suggestion from @riqq to use back tics solved the issue. So just had to change body: ${{env.SCRIPT_OUTPUT}} to:
QUESTION
We have workflow in GitHub Actions which has both types that trigger on event, e.g.pull-request, and on schedule.
Most of the steps are the same except for running test step. What we would like is:
- On pull-request without specific label provided: execute smoke test
- On pull-request with specific label OR on schedule: execute full test
The check for label can be done with contains(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'full-tests').
The question is how to check when the it is run on schedule? From my understanding of the documentation, when on schedule there is no payload for github.event for schedule. However checking github.event == null doesn't seems to work.
Is there a specific way to check whether it is running on schedule?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-08 at 21:53What you want to use in that case is the github.event_name variable, which represents the name of the event that triggered the workflow run in the github context.
In your case, to run a job or a step if the workflow run triggered on a scheduled event, you will need to use:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install pull-request
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
