omg | Gear set to follow DRY principle | Configuration Management library

Your current XPath addresses the attributes. I would change it to look for elements * and move the attribute criteria into a predicate, and then use the name() function to get the element's names:

there are two issues. first you are never making check while incrementing K++ second you are not using i even you cant use i value as i=s.length(); you always need to use till -1 because array starts from 0.

better option is:

first

Solved, the angle brackets provided in the docs should be REMOVED from all field, storePassword, keyPassowrd, alias, & storeFile

THANK THE LORD!

Historically speaking, DDS and DCPS were not the same thing. The following excerpt is from the introduction of version 1.2 of the DDS specification, published in 2006:

This specification describes two levels of interfaces:

• A lower DCPS (Data-Centric Publish-Subscribe) level that is targeted towards the efficient delivery of the proper information to the proper recipients.
• An optional higher DLRL (Data Local Reconstruction Layer) level, which allows for a simple integration of the Service into the application layer.

Then it goes on two explain in more detail so you can read it for yourself there.

It turned out that users adopted DCPS much more widely for their applications than DLRL and over time, DDS became synonymous to DCPS. In 2015, OMG published DLRL as a specification on its own, split off from the main DDS specification. The original acronym DCPS was maintained in the DDS specification.

If you look at Annex A - Compliance Points of the current version 1.4 of the DDS specification, you see:

This specification includes the following compliance profiles.

• Minimum profile: This profile contains just the mandatory features of DCPS. None of the optional features are included.

So DDS-compliant products always include a mandatory subset of DCPS.

Note that the name DDS may be used to indicate the one DDS specification specifically, but also to indicate the whole ecosystem of DDS specifications -- it depends on the context.

You can do this by iterating over myObj with a for-in-loop and creating cells with the values as textContent.

Dependency Injection is the concept of passing depended on objects into the object itself. In this case passing the IRepository repository into the AnonymousLoginService means that AnonmyousLoginService is dependent upon IRepository. It has nothing to do with the parameters passed into the methods.

If you feel it is best to have the separation of concerns and instantiating new db models in the method to verify that it is valid, instead of accepting user input as a db model and passing it in. It is okay.

Having the Domain Layer in a separate application is not wrong at all. Especially if you don't want to have to create a new Domain Layer for every application built. The Domain Layer could be used this way to loosely couple the code and have one single Domain Layer for multiple applications. Assuming that method return types, method names, and method parameters don't change, a change to the Domain Layer should not break any project depending on it.

As far as having the api know about both types of models (db and api models) sounds a lot better than having the Domain Layer know about both types of models. The Domain Layer would probably be better served to only know about Domain Models, then every application that uses the Domain Layer could also have access to the Domain Models. Instead of having the Domain Layer understand models from multiple projects, the only thing to consider is how secure the domain models should be? Maybe have set of dummy domain models (public facing db models) and a set of private db models (actual db models) and the Domain Layer gives access to the dummy models and then from there instantiates the actual db models. Ensuring that the actual logic and code is encapsulated.

something like that:

I think you are trying to store this value as a string but your code is storing as integer.

so your query is suppose to have this following query with this 01-02-20070858430013 quoted in a string before been placed in a values.