Mailbox | Swift Mailboxes as a shameless ripoff | Email library

You could use a combination of imap_search1 and imap_setflag_full2

When started, MailboxProcessor will run the asynchronous computation specified as the body. It will continue running until the body finishes (either by reaching the end or by throwing an exception) or until the program itself is terminated (as the mailbox processor runs in the background).

To comment on your examples:

• This mailbox processor prints nothing and halts the program - I assume you run this in a console app that terminates after the mailbox processor is created. There is nothing blocking the program and so it ends (killing the mailbox processor in the background).

• This mailbox processor counts up to 2207 then the program exits - I suspect this is for the same reason - your program creates the mailbox processor, which manages to run for a while, but then the program itself is terminated and the mailbox processor killed.

• This mailbox processor prints 1 then the program exits - The body of the mailbox processor hangs and the next two messages are queued. The queue is never processed (because the body has hanged) and then your program terminates.

You will get more useful insights if you add something like Console.ReadLine() to the end of your program, because this will prevent the program from terminating and killing the mailbox processor.

For example, the following will process all 100000 items:

You need to tell sidekiq which queues to process. By default, some frameworks have their own queue names.

Create a sidekiq configuration file (e. g. config/sidekiq.yml) and define the queues that it should use

This strange behaviour with the visible state of a "save queue" was only true in the interpreted code running in the shell, not in regular compiled modules. In the actual C implementation of receive, there is only one queue with a pointer to keep track of which ones have been scanned so far, and process_info does not show an empty queue during a real receive. The behaviour of the interpreted code was fixed back in R16B01, so nowadays there is no visible difference: https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/acb8ef5d18cc3976bf580a8e6925cb5641acd401

From Oracle docs for shutdownNow:

There are no guarantees beyond best-effort attempts to stop processing actively executing tasks. For example, typical implementations will cancel via Thread.interrupt(), so any task that fails to respond to interrupts may never terminate.

If you take a look into ThreadPoolExecutor sources, you will find out that shutdownNow interrupts threads with this code:

As you may have seen, the -AutoSize is not very exact, it tends to leave more width than needed. In case you need to set a hardcoded value to one of the columns you can use:

• $xlsx.Workbook.Worksheets['SheetName'].Column(n).width = newVal

NOTE: This method requires the use of -PassThru.

Here is a minimal reproducible example:

To scrape the Virk, Post, By, Web and Mail information you can use the Locator Strategies:

Code Block:

IActorRefFactory is an interface responsible for determining a parent and in case of Akka.FSharp it's implemented by ActorSystem and Actor<_> as well. So in your case just use:

There were two issues with your overrides:

1. You are using ListItemButton in your code without ListItem which is fine, but then you need to use MuiListItemButton instead of MuiListItem for the component name in the theme.
2. You used "&$selected" to reference the selected state, but this should instead be "&.Mui-selected".

From https://mui.com/guides/migration-v4/#migrate-themes-styleoverrides-to-emotion:

Although your style overrides defined in the theme may partially work, there is an important difference on how the nested elements are styled. The $ syntax used with JSS will not work with Emotion. You need to replace those selectors with a valid class selector.

Here's what the working version looks like: