RxAlamofire | RxSwift wrapper around the elegant HTTP networking | Networking library
kandi X-RAY | RxAlamofire Summary
kandi X-RAY | RxAlamofire Summary
RxSwift wrapper around the elegant HTTP networking in Swift Alamofire
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of RxAlamofire
RxAlamofire Key Features
RxAlamofire Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on RxAlamofire
QUESTION
I'm updating my code with RxAlamofire. I updated RxAlmofire with lastest version. How can i update this code config.httpAdditionalHeaders = SessionManager.defaultHTTPHeaders
in
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-22 at 07:12Alamofire5 has renamed SessionManager
to Session
Follow the migration guide here
, and so as to RxAlamofire
QUESTION
We are using Cocoapods as dependency manager for our project, and I realized we don't really have a strategy when it comes to versioning.
Our podfile contains all sorts of syntax such as optimistic operator, logical operator, exact versioning ... etc
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-29 at 21:03This is a borderline appropriate question for stackoverflow since there could be a lot of opinions. Here's an attempt at an objective concrete answer.
Start with a good understanding of semantic versioning.
Then your tolerance for accepting patch, minor, and major version dependencies depends upon the stability versus desire for new features that you want for each of those dependencies intersected with the testing capability.
For example:
- If you don't trust the dependency to follow semantic versioning and/or the existing version meets all needs, lock it to a particular exact version.
- If you want bug fixes, but don't care about new features, use the
~
operator to accept patch updates. - If you want new features, but don't want the existing build to break, allow minor updates.
- If you always want the latest and are willing to deal with breaking changes, don't specify a version constraint at all.
QUESTION
[!] Unable to find a specification for `Firebase/Analytics`
You have either:
* out-of-date source repos which you can update with `pod repo update` or with `pod install --repo-update`.
* mistyped the name or version.
* not added the source repo that hosts the Podspec to your Podfile.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Mar-26 at 13:51Add this to the top of your file:
QUESTION
I am trying to create function which return Observable<(HTTPURLResponse, Any)> using RxAlamofire:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-14 at 14:33Hello you have to add your request into a DisposeBag
:
QUESTION
I'm trying to create a function which returns Observable<(HTTPURLResponse, Any)>
using RxAlamofire
:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-14 at 15:52Why are you wrapping requestJSON
function with another Observable which is just forwarding the same element and error, when that function is already returning the Observable you need?.
Isn't this enough for you?
QUESTION
Following is my code to do RxAlamofire requests
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jan-10 at 14:04Here's the most obvious solution:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install RxAlamofire
There are three ways to install RxAlamofire.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page