Swift-Extensions | awsome swift extensions , will help you stop | DevOps library
kandi X-RAY | Swift-Extensions Summary
kandi X-RAY | Swift-Extensions Summary
awsome swift extensions, will help you stop struggling with those frequent small problems
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of Swift-Extensions
Swift-Extensions Key Features
Swift-Extensions Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on Swift-Extensions
QUESTION
I've been looking through the swift docs and working through some examples around encapsulation, and am unsure about the behaviour that I'm seeing. I've looked for similar questions on stack, looked through the doc and looked through some tutorials (see the link below) and although this is a trivial question can't find an answer (possibly as Swift has changed?)
Creating a simple Struct representing a queue:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Mar-01 at 02:44From the Swift's book:
Private access restricts the use of an entity to the enclosing declaration. Use private access to hide the implementation details of a specific piece of functionality when those details are used only within a single declaration.
So a private
variable is only accessible within the set of curly brackets where it's defined. Swift's Access Control has never been like those of C++
, Java or C#.
QUESTION
Personally, I prefer extension methods with prefix in Swift. It makes easier to guess whether a function is from the original class or from the extension at first glance. Also, it makes frameworks more reusable in other projects. We don't need to search for the namespace in which the framework method belongs. However, adding prefix to all instance and static methods in extensions is a little bit exhaustive. For this reason, I want to create a module that contains all extension methods whether it is instance or static.
I have taken a look at this implementation, and liked it but unfortunately it only works for instance methods:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Sep-20 at 16:45Inspired by the approach RxSwift went on, here's a solution that provides access to both instance and static members of the my
extension.
First things first, let's declare the basis for the extension:
QUESTION
I'm using an analytics tool which logs the accessibilityLabel
of buttons.
I'm trying to find a way to update the accessibilityLabel
without changing my existing code.
For normal buttons I use the titleLabel.text
. For iconButtons which use their the name coming from image assets I use accessibilityLabel
itself.
Some issues I faced:
- can't access
accessibilityLabel
within its getter. Because that would recursively look foraccessibilityLabel
. - So I had to use another property for backing and since this was an extension I wasn't able to use stored properties. Computed properties didn't work either because it would get stuck in the same feedback loop.
- Eventually I hacked my way by using
accessibilityHint
. It's a stored property that I have no use of...
This works! Yet I've been told and read that I shouldn't override functions in an extension as that's not reliable. So I'm wondering what I should do?
And if Swift has any mechanism that doesn't involve overriding in UIButton's extension?!
here is my code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jun-12 at 15:22You're fighting the system. You can achieve this using subclassing.
To avoid similar problems in the future, always have ALL your UIButton
, UITableViewCell
, UIViewController
, etc subclassed from your own base class so you can easily make such universal changes.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install Swift-Extensions
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page