github-pages-deploy-action | 🚀 Automatically deploy your project to GitHub Pages | Continous Integration library
kandi X-RAY | github-pages-deploy-action Summary
kandi X-RAY | github-pages-deploy-action Summary
Automatically deploy your project to GitHub Pages with GitHub Actions. This action can be configured to push your production-ready code into any branch you'd like, including gh-pages and docs. It can also handle cross repository deployments and works with GitHub Enterprise too. Maintenance of this project is made possible by all the contributors and sponsors. If you'd like to sponsor this project and have your avatar or company logo appear below click here. .
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of github-pages-deploy-action
github-pages-deploy-action Key Features
github-pages-deploy-action Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on github-pages-deploy-action
QUESTION
As you may (or may not) know yesterday was a major incident of GitHub's services: https://www.githubstatus.com/incidents/tyc8wpsgr2r8.
Unfortunately I published a release during that time and the action responsible for building and publishing the code didn't trigger.
For actions which executed at least once I have an option to "Re-run workflow" - but how can I proceed with an action which didn't even trigger - I can not see it anywhere whatsoever?
I think the last resort would be to just make another release, remove the problematic one etc. but I'd like to avoid that.
The workflow file:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-27 at 00:10As you said in the comment, the easiest solution would be to remove the release and create it all over again.
Another option could be to add a workflow_dispatch
event trigger to the workflow with a tag
input, updating the jobs condition to use this input.tag
variable if informed.
That way, if an automatic trigger failed (through push, release or pull_request), you could trigger it manually through the Github UI or the GH CLI as an alternative.
QUESTION
How can I let Github actions access my .env.local file for building my Next JS app without exposing the .env.local file on my github repository?
Currently, the build will not have access to .env.local when building using Github Actions (because that file is not pushed to the Github repo).
I have a next.config.js file that looks like
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-23 at 13:07Besides the .env.local
file, which is typically meant to contain things that are only needed locally, you can also use a file .env
, .env.development
, or .env.production
. These files could then be checked in.
Your .env
file can contain global defaults (e.g. some config). With the others, you can override configs specific to that environment.
As opposed to the .env.local
file, the other three would typically be checked in.
See their docs for more info.
QUESTION
The GitHub Action below performs two steps:
- long.py fetches the data from an API and saves it but the data rarely changes
- quick.py processes the saved data generated by long.py
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-13 at 13:06Easiest way is to use caching:
https://github.com/actions/cache
You can use hash of your file as a key.
QUESTION
I am currently to crate a composite GitHub Actions that build a JavaDoc from Java project and publish it automatically to a static page with GitHub Page.
ProblematicBut I got this error when I try to run it:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-09 at 00:46When using composite actions, you have to specify shell.
In your case the problem is in this step, you need to add shell: bash
here:
QUESTION
I am using this GitHub action https://github.com/JamesIves/fetch-api-data-action to fetch and save data fetched by an API:
this is my configuration for 2 actions, one to fetch the API and then build and deploy to save the .json fetching from the API
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-07 at 19:50You are using an old version of that action. Perhaps try moving to v4 which handles some of these parameters differently. If you are pushing back to the same repository you do not even need to pass a token.
Other than that, I see two possible things to check:
You reference branch
main
in the first action butmaster
in the second. Are these pointing to the same repository? If so, I'd think the branch names would be the same.With the v3 component, the docs for
ACCESS_TOKEN
kind of imply you need to be using a generated Personal Access Token that you have stored in the secrets. That is what I used when using this action although I was pushing to a different repository so the was a must anyway.
I moved to v4 quite a while ago though.
QUESTION
gh-pages deployment fails with next error: My repository failed job
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-19 at 19:36I misunderstood the issue message, the problem was not duplicating the problem was the missed inner path passed in FOLDER in gh-pages YML settings
There was a hint in BUILD step
And one more thing: do not forget to get and add to GH your personal-access-token
QUESTION
I think I have followed all the steps to deploy Blazor webassembly on GitHub Pages using GitHub Actions which I found from https://www.davideguida.com/how-to-deploy-blazor-webassembly-on-github-pages-using-github-actions/
But it failed at Deploy to Github Pages
step
- Set up job (Passed)
- Run actions/checkout@v2 (Passed)
- Setup .NET Core (Passed)
- Publish with dotnet (Passed)
- Deploy to Github Pages (Failed)
- Post Run actions/checkout@v2 (Passed)
- Complete job (Passed)
Here are the error descriptions
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-05 at 18:20You need to create a branch named development
from master
branch and set development
branch as default
branch in your repository settings.
This is because your gh-pages.yml
files has BASE_BRANCH: development
and BRANCH: master
QUESTION
I have deployed my Angular
website on GitHub
page, but I got a problem.
The below is my route
setting:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-12 at 15:55According to the Angular doc, you have to make a copy of index.html
and name it 404.html
.
- When the build is complete, make a copy of docs/index.html and name it docs/404.html.
bash ng build --prod --output-path docs --base-href//
QUESTION
I would like to setup my workflow to do the following:
- On any event (pull-request, push on any branches)
- Checkout code
- Build project
- Run tests
- Upload artifacts for other jobs
- Only when master is pushed
- Download artifacts from previous job
- Push GH-pages
- Only when a tag is pushed
- Download artifacts from previous job
- Create a release
- Upload artifacts to the release
In my .github/workflows
the on
directives applies to all jobs so it won't work in my case. On the other hand, the action/upload-artifact
only works within the same workflow.
What is the proper way to achieve the described workflow?
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-02 at 20:29You could add conditions to your steps and simply skip parts which aren't needed, see jobs..steps.if
. As for what to check, github
context is a goldmine of various data related to currently running workflow. For example
QUESTION
My goal: my react app has an environment variable to store a Github Personal_Access_Token
(later used in HTTP header for a fetch), then I will later deploy the app to Github page using Action Workflow.
What I tried: Given that pushing/exposing token as plain text to Githut is a violation, I would use Github secrets to avoid it. I found this post and tried to implement Github Workflow to access the secret then deploy.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-07 at 04:53The problem is that React is purely a front-end framework. Everything that should be available directly in React is also available to your users to see. There's no way around this!
To really keep the secret private it has to be somewhere server side and not on the front-end. One way you could do this is make a "serverless function" (there are multiple generous free offers available on different services). Then you proxy through there, which basically means that:
- Your react front-end fetches from your serverless function without any secret.
- Your serverless function has the secret stored and does the same fetch on the actual service with secret.
- Your serverless function can now return the response it got back to your React front-end.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install github-pages-deploy-action
If you're using a custom domain and require a CNAME file, or if you require the use of a .nojekyll file, you can safely commit these files directly into the deployment branch without them being overridden after each deployment, additionally, you can include these files in your deployment folder to update them. If you need to add additional files to the deployment that should be ignored by the build clean-up steps you can utilize the clean-exclude option. If you wish to remove these files you must go into the deployment branch directly to remove them. This is to prevent accidental changes in your deployment script from creating breaking changes.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page