CloudProxy | Proxy server to bypass Cloudflare protection | Proxy library

by NoahCardoza TypeScript Version: v1.0.0 License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(3)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | CloudProxy Summary

CloudProxy is a TypeScript library typically used in Networking, Proxy applications. CloudProxy has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Proxy server to bypass Cloudflare protection. :warning: This project is in beta state. Some things may not work and the API can change at any time. See the known issues section.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

CloudProxy has a low active ecosystem.

It has 421 star(s) with 65 fork(s). There are 15 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

There are 12 open issues and 20 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 17 days. There are 1 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of CloudProxy is v1.0.0

Quality

CloudProxy has no bugs reported.

Security

CloudProxy has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

License

CloudProxy is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

CloudProxy releases are available to install and integrate.

Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of CloudProxy

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

CloudProxy Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for CloudProxy.

CloudProxy Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for CloudProxy.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on CloudProxy

deployment throwing error for init container only when I add a second regular container to my deployment

htaccess returns 404 at Wordpress in subdirectory (desktop ok, mobile 404)

GKE private cluster and cloud sql proxy connection

QUESTION

deployment throwing error for init container only when I add a second regular container to my deployment

Asked 2021-May-05 at 07:54

Hi There I am currently trying to deploy sonarqube 7.8-community in GKE using a DB cloudsql instance.

This requires 2 containers ( one for sonarqube and the other for the cloudproxy in order to connect to the DB)

Sonarqube container, however, also requires an init container to give it some special memory requirments.

When I create the deployment with just the sonarqube image and the init container it works fine but this wont be of any use as I need the cloudsql proxy container to connect to my external db. When I add this container though the deployment suddenly errors with the below

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-May-05 at 07:54

Your yaml file is incorrect. You have two spec: blocks. It should be only one. You need to combine it together. Under spec block should be initContainers block, then containers and finally volumes block. Look at the correct yaml file below:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67382354

QUESTION

htaccess returns 404 at Wordpress in subdirectory (desktop ok, mobile 404)

Asked 2020-Mar-06 at 21:30

I have a website made in WordPress, installed in a subdirectory (let's call it "wp_dir"). I have followed the instructions in https://wordpress.org/support/article/giving-wordpress-its-own-directory/, specifically:

change the root htaccess file
change the root index.php file
change the wp_dir htaccess file

It works well, in desktop, but not in mobile. In desktop, the site is rendered well: when you type "example.com", it renders the wordpress site well, from the wordpress installed in wp_dir folder, with SSL and everything. All menu links work well.

In mobile, instead, when you type "example.com", the url changes to "example.com/wp_dir", with SSL, and menu links are shown, but shows a 404 error. Links work.

I believe the problem is SSL related. I have also tried removing the [L] directives, in order to allow the instructions to continue being executed, but to no avail. Something is not working ok, or in the proper order, but I can't find what.

The htaccess file is pretty messed up with many different instructions (SSL, non-www redirection, permissions to other subdirectories for management applications, block exploits, etc). The site was previously built in Joomla. Obviously I've done something wrong, but I can't figure out what that is.

How can it work well when you access it in a desktop computer, and not in a mobile phone?

Here is the current htaccess in the root directory (without the mess):

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Mar-06 at 21:30

I think there might be a problem with your rewrite in the subdirectory. First I presume you want to keep the same link. If we look at the tutorial linked there is only need for one .htaccess in the root directory.

Since if a request is made anywhere on the site and if it's not a direct file or directory the root htaccess file will redirect it to the subfolder.

Now, your second subfolder .htaccess file is actually pointing back to the root directory. If you want to have a .htaccess redirect in the subfolder you should add the rewrite base and the subfolder to the redirect.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60500045

QUESTION

GKE private cluster and cloud sql proxy connection

Asked 2019-Apr-06 at 14:30

I have 2 GKE cluster both private and public and using cloudproxy as sidecar container for gke app to access cloudsql instance.

public cluster setup for development/testing

Cloud SQL is enabled with both private and public IP. GKE app is using cloudproxy with default option of ip types (public,private) as below Cloud SQL doesn't have any authorized network.

In this case, my app is able to connect CloudSQL and works smoothly. As far as I understand, here connection to cloudsql should be happening with private becuase there is no authorised network configured.

private cluster setup for production

Cloud SQL is enabled with both private and public IP. GKE app is using cloudproxy with default option of ip types (public,private)

cloudsql-proxy setting in deployment file

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Apr-01 at 16:06

It looks like the question here is "Should we use the Cloud SQL proxy in a private cluster?" and that answer is "it depends". It's not required to connect, but it allows for more security because you can restrict unnecessary access to your Cloud SQL server.

The Cloud SQL proxy doesn't provide connectivity for you application - it only provides authentication. It has to be able to connect via the existing path, but then uses the Service Account's IAM roles to authenticate the connection. This also means that it doesn't have to come from a whitelisted network because it's been authenticated by a different means.

If you want to use the proxy to connect via Private IP (instead of defaulting to public), use the -ip_address_types=PRIVATE - this will tell the proxy to connect with the instance's Private IP instead. (Please note that if the proxy lacks a network path (eg, isn't on the VPC) that proxy will still be unable to connect.)

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55457625

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install CloudProxy

Run PUPPETEER_PRODUCT=chrome npm install to install CloudProxy dependencies.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: