constructs | Define composable configuration models through code | Configuration Management library

But suppose we aren't after the wizardry of presets but rather want to do something a lot more primitive—simulating launching a few instructions from the (bash, etc) command line?

Also suppose we're quite happy with the default Decider('MD5'). What is the translation of the one-souce-one-target:

The way I went about this is: I have a byte array that contains one wave of a beep. I then repeated that until I had the desired length. After that I inserted those bytes into a new array and put bytes containing 00 (in hexadecimal) to separate the beeps.

If I add 1 beep to a WAVE file, it creates the file correctly (i.e. I get a beep of the desired length). Here is a picture of the waves zoomed in (I opened the file in Audacity): And here is a picture of the entire wave part:

The problem now is that when I add a second beep, the second one becomes completely distorted: So this is what the entire file looks like now:

If I add another beep, it will be the correct beep again, If I add yet another beep it's going to be distorted again, etc. So basically, every other wave is distorted.

Does anyone know why this happens?

Here is a link to a .txt file I generated containing the the audio data of the wave file I created: byteTest19.txt

And here is a lint to a .txt file that I generated using file format.info that is a hexadecimal representation of the bytes in the .wav file I generated containing 5 beeps (with two of them, the even beeps being distorted): test3.txt

You can tell when a new beep starts because it is preceded by a lot of 00's.

As far as I can see, the bytes of the second beep does not differ from the first one, which is why I am asking this question.

If anyone knows why this happens, please help me. If you need more information, don't hesitate to ask. I hope I explained well what I'm doing, if not, that's my bad.

EDIT Here is my code:

However, there are a lot of layers to the transpilation of a Typescript Next project, so I am unsure if this is the correct place to file the issue and matches with the likely source of the failure.

Does this issue seem like it matches with the babel-jest project or should I file it somewhere else?

BUG

I found in a complex Next Typescript project that adding a handful of lines in one file was enough to break babel-jest transpilation and create runtime errors in a completely different file.

In commit 04c4c7b, after checking out the clean project and running yarn I am able to get passing tests with yarn run test. The passing source tree is at https://github.com/cefn/jest-transpile-failure-repro/tree/04c4c7b7013e8b88c25d3ab2a7d4a33ccd3fb191

However, after adding the handful of lines which you can see in commit 25703fc the babel-jest transpiler seems to effectively break making tests impossible to run, and a totally unrelated file starts to get runtime errors during the test which make no sense like...

My attempt was as follows:

I want to find the distinct columns of change numbers and after that for each of the serial numbers, I want to map it to the “distinct” change number column that is found. I believe that I am not doing this the most efficient way.

In the example, below, v1 and v4 are identical and v2 and v5 are identical. v3 and v6 do not have duplicate columns. This means that the non duplicate columns are: v1, v2, v3, v6. I now would like to get a mapping like below

v1,v1
v2,v5
v3,v3
v4,v1
v5,v5
v6,v6

And I can't seem to be done with the second part (removing all multiples)

So far this is what I've got:

I've included each DFS method, recursive, iterative stack, iterative queue, and iterative Map iterators with the order of each being logged:

They processes are not spawned in a way I control (to be clear, they are my code), so i cannot use multithreading.Lock, at least as I understand it. The resource being synchronized is a series of reads/writes to two separate internal services, which are old, stateful, not designed for concurrent/transactional access, and out of scope to modify.

a couple approaches I'm familiar with but rejected so far:

• In native code using shmget / pthread_mutex_lock (eg create a pthread mutex by well-known string name, in shared memory provided by the OS). Im hoping to not have to use/add a ctypes wrapper for this (or ideally have any low-level constructs visible at all here for this high-level app).
• Using one of the lock file libraries such as fasteners would work - but requiring any particular file system access is awkward (the library/approach could use it robustly under the hood, but ideally my client code is abstracted from that).

Is there a preferred way to accomplish this in python (under linux; bonus points for cross-platform)?