mute | a scalable collaborative document editor with CRDT , P2P | Editor library

I am working on an application where I want to load View Component. On local machine it is working with out any problem or error but when I make deployment it is not working properly and gives me error of 500. Here is my implementation.

Jquery Function

I want to play some audio with volume lvl adjusted to ear aka. "phone call mode". For this purpose, I'm using well-known and commonly advised

Below are three files to illustrate my question and the way my program is structured. What I want to do is use the bootstrap card and within it put an R variable (e.g., the result of some calculation). Is there a way I can do that with the HTML in a separate document?

For example, suppose myVariable <- 2^2 is done within the server file and I want the result of that calculation in the object myVariable to be inside the card where I've denoted "put R variable".

Thank you for advice or suggestions.

I have a component in my react website that allows my users to upload multiple images just by either clicking or dragging and dropping.

When I upload the images they are being saved in my firebase storage but the URL's for each indiviual image are not being set and i get a firebase error that reads:

I am trying to get to grips with the specifics of the (C++20) standards requirements for container classes with a view to writing some container classes that are compatible with the standard library. To begin looking into this matter I have looked up the references for named requirements, specifically around container requirements, and have only found one general container requirement called Container given by the standard. Reading this requirement has given my two queries that I am unsure about and would like some clarification on:

1. The requirement for the expression a == b for two container type C has as precondition on the element type T that it is equality comparable. However, noted later on the same page under the header 'other requirements' is the explicitly requirement that T be always equality comparable. Thus, on my reading the precondition for the aforementioned requirement is redundant and need not be given. Am I correct in this thinking, or is there something else at play here that I should take into account?

2. I was surprised to see explicit requirements on T at all: notably the equality comparable requirement above and the named requirement destructible. Does this mean it is undefined behaviour to ever construct standard containers of types failing these requirements, or only to perform certain standard library function calls on them?

Apologies if these two questions sound asinine, I am currently trying to transition my C++ knowledge from a place of having a basic understanding of how to use features to a robust understanding so that I may write good generic code. Whilst I am trying to use (a draft of) the standard to look up behaviour where possible, its verbiage is oft too verbose for me to completely understand what is actually being said.

In an attempt to seek the answer I cooked up a a quick test .cpp file to try an compile, given below. All uncommented code compiles with MSVC compiler set to C++20. All commented code will not compile, and visa versa all uncommented code will. It seems that what one naively thinks should work does In particular:

• We cannot construct any object without a destructor, though the objects type is valid and can be used for other things (for example as a template parameter!)
• We cannot create an object of vector, where T has no destructor, even if we don't attempt to create any objects T. Presumably because creating the destructor for vector tries to access a destructor for T.
• We can create an object of type vector, T where T has no operator ==, so long as we do not try to use operator ==, which would require T to have operator ==.

However, just because my compiler lets me make an object of vector where T is not equality-comparable does not mean I have achieved standards compliant behaviour/ all of our behaviour is not undefined - which is what I want I concerned about, especially as at least some of the usual requirements on the container object have been violated.

Code:

My situation:

• I have a basic HTML page (intranet) that takes a video and plays it on loop.
• Almost every day a new video gets created and I go to the index.html and change the value of the src.
• The web page is static on a remote display so I need to go and make a refresh to the web page.

HTML Code

So I have a c# class library project that I only intend to use on windows. It contains some classes that use the System.Drawing.Image class which is only available on windows. After upgrading to VS2022 and setting the target framework to .NET 6.0 I'm seeing a bunch of warnings that say CA1416 "This call site is reachable on all platforms. 'SomeClass.SomeMethod' is only supported on: 'windows'. See screenshot below for some examples:

In some sense, it's cool that VS2022 has scanned the library and found all the platform specific code that I'm using in the library. But I'd like to tell VS that I only plan to use the library on windows and it can mute all those warnings.

First I checked the Target Platform options in the properties of the project but didn't seen any windows specific targets.

Then I decided to edit the project's .csproj directly and changed the Target framework from

net6.0
to
net6.0-windows

But sadly even after a recompile, that didn't make the warnings go away either. So then I did some reading on the CA1416 warnings and sure enough it says in the Microsoft Docs that the TFM is ignored for assessing this warning however VS does add an attribute to the project based on the TFM that influences this warning, but it only does so if the project is configured to generate the AssemblyInfo.cs file on the fly. But alas, my project's AssemblyInfo.cs is maintained as a actual file rather then having it auto generated at build time.

So at this point, I'm ready to punt the ball and just disable CA1416 warnings for my project. So in the project's .proj file I added CA1416 for both the release and debug builds like so:

One would think that would be the end of those pesky warnings. (sigh) As it turns out, after rebuilding the project the warnings still show up. Got any suggestions? I'm all ears.

I'm having a issue with mobile users using low power mode not loading the background video on my website, i've done some researching and there seems to be no resolution for this issue. This brings me to my question, how do I make it so desktop users see the video but mobile users see an image instead? Below is my HTML and CSS for my background video ID.

I have written a code for NA button in which it disable the question after click.But if user click it by mistake i am not able to make it enable after 2nd click.

Below is the code for button.