www | wiredjs.com website - wiredjs | Web Site library
kandi X-RAY | www Summary
kandi X-RAY | www Summary
wiredjs.com website
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of www
www Key Features
www Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on www
QUESTION
I want to add jitpack.io as a repository in my gradle file. This is my gradle root file:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-16 at 11:02Android introduced a new way to define repositories.
Remove the dependencyResolutionManagement
block from the setting.gradle
file to have your project work the old way.
QUESTION
I saw a video about speed of loops in python, where it was explained that doing sum(range(N))
is much faster than manually looping through range
and adding the variables together, since the former runs in C due to built-in functions being used, while in the latter the summation is done in (slow) python. I was curious what happens when adding numpy
to the mix. As I expected np.sum(np.arange(N))
is the fastest, but sum(np.arange(N))
and np.sum(range(N))
are even slower than doing the naive for loop.
Why is this?
Here's the script I used to test, some comments about the supposed cause of slowing done where I know (taken mostly from the video) and the results I got on my machine (python 3.10.0, numpy 1.21.2):
updated script:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-16 at 17:42From the cpython source code for sum
sum initially seems to attempt a fast path that assumes all inputs are the same type. If that fails it will just iterate:
QUESTION
I'm trying to build a project in my M1,
but I got this error when I run npx react-native run-android
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-02 at 23:03The error is being caused because one of your dependencies is internally using WorkManager 2.7.0-beta01 that was released today (which needs API 31). In my case it was CheckAarMetadata.kt
.
You can fix it by forcing Gradle to use an older version of Work Manager for the transitive dependency that works with API 30. In your build.gradle
file add:
QUESTION
Is there a way to obtain the greatest value representable by the floating-point type float
which is smaller than 1
.
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-08 at 23:51You can use the std::nextafter
function, which, despite its name, can retrieve the next representable value that is arithmetically before a given starting point, by using an appropriate to
argument. (Often -Infinity
, 0
, or +Infinity
).
This works portably by definition of nextafter
, regardless of what floating-point format your C++ implementation uses. (Binary vs. decimal, or width of mantissa aka significand, or anything else.)
Example: Retrieving the closest value less than 1 for the double
type (on Windows, using the clang-cl compiler in Visual Studio 2019), the answer is different from the result of the 1 - ε
calculation (which as discussed in comments, is incorrect for IEEE754 numbers; below any power of 2, representable numbers are twice as close together as above it):
QUESTION
I am building a Gatsby site. I upgraded Node.js to v17.0.1, and when I run a build, there is an error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-04 at 23:33Gatsby must be using an algorithm or key size which is no longer allowed by default with OpenSSL 3.0.
UPDATE ⚠️This is most likely a webpack issue - https://github.com/webpack/webpack/issues/14532
They have since released a fix in version 5.61.0 - https://github.com/webpack/webpack/releases/tag/v5.61.0 - so upgrading webpack should address the issue as well
A member of the webpack team has stated they do not plan to backport the fix to webpack 4, so if you are on webpack 4 you may need to look to upgrading to webpack 5 first.
From Node.js 17's announcement post:
If you hit an
ERR_OSSL_EVP_UNSUPPORTED
error in your application with Node.js 17, it’s likely that your application or a module you’re using is attempting to use an algorithm or key size which is no longer allowed by default with OpenSSL 3.0. A new command-line option,--openssl-legacy-provider
, has been added to revert to the legacy provider as a temporary workaround for these tightened restrictions.
Running this on the terminal might look like:
QUESTION
I am reading this book by Fedor Pikus and he has some very very interesting examples which for me were a surprise.
Particularly this benchmark caught me, where the only difference is that in one of them we use || in if and in another we use |.
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-08 at 19:57Code readability, short-circuiting and it is not guaranteed that Ord will always outperform a ||
operand.
Computer systems are more complicated than expected, even though they are man-made.
There was a case where a for loop with a much more complicated condition ran faster on an IBM. The CPU didn't cool and thus instructions were executed faster, that was a possible reason. What I am trying to say, focus on other areas to improve code than fighting small-cases which will differ depending on the CPU and the boolean evaluation (compiler optimizations).
QUESTION
#include
int& addOne(int& x)
{
x += 1;
return x;
}
int main()
{
int x {5};
addOne(x) = x;
std::cout << x << ' ' << addOne(x);
}
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-02 at 00:42Since C++17 the order of evaluation is specified such that the operands of =
are evaluated right-to-left and those of <<
are evaluated left-to-right, matching the associativity of these operators. (But this doesn't apply to all operators, e.g. +
and other arithmetic operators.)
So in
QUESTION
With regard to the Log4j JNDI remote code execution vulnerability that has been identified CVE-2021-44228 - (also see references) - I wondered if Log4j-v1.2 is also impacted, but the closest I got from source code review is the JMS-Appender.
The question is, while the posts on the Internet indicate that Log4j 1.2 is also vulnerable, I am not able to find the relevant source code for it.
Am I missing something that others have identified?
Log4j 1.2 appears to have a vulnerability in the socket-server class, but my understanding is that it needs to be enabled in the first place for it to be applicable and hence is not a passive threat unlike the JNDI-lookup vulnerability which the one identified appears to be.
Is my understanding - that Log4j v1.2 - is not vulnerable to the jndi-remote-code execution bug correct?
ReferencesThis blog post from Cloudflare also indicates the same point as from AKX....that it was introduced from Log4j 2!
Update #1 - A fork of the (now-retired) apache-log4j-1.2.x with patch fixes for few vulnerabilities identified in the older library is now available (from the original log4j author). The site is https://reload4j.qos.ch/. As of 21-Jan-2022 version 1.2.18.2 has been released. Vulnerabilities addressed to date include those pertaining to JMSAppender, SocketServer and Chainsaw vulnerabilities. Note that I am simply relaying this information. Have not verified the fixes from my end. Please refer the link for additional details.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-01 at 18:43The JNDI feature was added into Log4j 2.0-beta9.
Log4j 1.x thus does not have the vulnerable code.
QUESTION
Trying to install openssl on homebrew using:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-03 at 15:29Seems a bug of openssl itself. https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/16487
~~What about export SDKROOT="/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk "
?~~
Homebrew pre-build packages for some versions of macOS. But it keep dropping this pre-building support for old macOS. On macOS 10.12, you're building openssl
from the source code and Xcode command line tool is needed.
QUESTION
I am trying to efficiently compute a summation of a summation in Python:
WolframAlpha is able to compute it too a high n value: sum of sum.
I have two approaches: a for loop method and an np.sum method. I thought the np.sum approach would be faster. However, they are the same until a large n, after which the np.sum has overflow errors and gives the wrong result.
I am trying to find the fastest way to compute this sum.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-16 at 12:49(fastest methods, 3 and 4, are at the end)
In a fast NumPy method you need to specify dtype=np.object
so that NumPy does not convert Python int
to its own dtypes (np.int64
or others). It will now give you correct results (checked it up to N=100000).
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install www
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page