BRANCH | Boosting RNA-Seq assemblies | Genomics library
kandi X-RAY | BRANCH Summary
kandi X-RAY | BRANCH Summary
[Overview] (#overview) [Copy right] (#copyright) [How to cite BRANCH?] (#cite) [Short Manual] (#manual). BRANCH is suitable for 32-bit or 64-bit machines with Linux operating systems. At least 4GB of system memory is recommended for assembling larger data sets.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of BRANCH
BRANCH Key Features
BRANCH Examples and Code Snippets
Lines of Code : 49License : Non-SPDX (Apache License 2.0)
Copydef _make_output_composite_tensors_match(op_type, branch_graphs):
"""Modifies each branch_graph's outputs to have the same output signature.
Currently the only transformation implemented is turning a Tensor into an
equivalent IndexedSlices if def indexed_case(branch_index,
branch_fns,
name="indexed_case",
lower_using_switch_merge=None):
"""Like conv_v2, except emits a Case op instead of an If."""
if isinstance(branch_index, int):
def BuildCondBranch(self, fn):
"""Add the subgraph defined by fn() to the graph."""
pre_summaries = ops.get_collection(ops.GraphKeys._SUMMARY_COLLECTION) # pylint: disable=protected-access
original_result = fn()
post_summaries = ops. Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on BRANCH
QUESTION
I had to delete my git branch and now need to fetch that remote branch.
I did the following steps as I've seen someone's post here.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-16 at 01:25If anyone help me understand whether my-branch will be matched with the remote one or not
Probably. But it's impossible to be certain from the info you have given. To find out, say
QUESTION
When setting up an Azure Static WebApp when I chose GitHub as the source provider, the UI provides an option to choose from one of the existing branches. But once the app is created I don't see any option to change the source. Whereas in Azure "App Service", you can disconnect from GitHub and establish the connection again with a different branch.
So, Is it possible to change the source branch in Azure SWA?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 16:36You might've sorted it out by now, but this confused me as well and it turns out that you set this up on the deployment setup. In my case I'm using DevOps/Pipelines, and on the pipeline (equivalent to Github Actions) you can choose which branch to source from. Then you run the pipeline, and that will automatically change the source in the Static Web app.
QUESTION
I have a static website which is generating an output folder to the MyBlog/output in the master branch. But I want output to be the source of my GH Pages, I am looking for a way to use output as the root of gh-pages branch.
That's my deploy.yml
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 13:28Ok, this should work. Remove the last line - run: git push from your action. Then add the following.
QUESTION
I have a question about how rebasing works in git, in part because whenever I ask other devs questions about it I get vague, abstract, high level "architect-y speak" that doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me.
It sounds as if rebasing "replays" commits, one after another (so sequentially) from the source branch over the changes in my working branch, is this the case? So if I have a feature branch, say, feature/xyz-123 that was cut from develop originally, and then I rebase from origin/develop, then it replays all the commits made to develop since I branched off of it. Furthermore, it does so, one develop commit at a time, until all the changes have been "replayed" into my feature branch, yes?
If anything I have said above is incorrect or misled, please begin by correcting me! But assuming I'm more or less correct, I'm not seeing how this is any different than merging in changes from develop by doing a git merge develop. Don't both methods result with all the latest changes from develop making their way into feature/xyz-123?
I'm sure this is not the case but I'm just not seeing the forest through the trees here. If someone could give a concrete example (with perhaps some mock commits and git command line invocations) I might be able to understand the difference in how rebase works versus a merge. Thanks in advance!
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 13:22" It sounds as if rebasing "replays" commits, one after another (so sequentially) from the source branch over the changes in my working branch, is this the case? "
Yes.
" Furthermore, it does so, one develop commit at a time, until all the changes have been "replayed" into my feature branch, yes? "
No, it's the contrary. If you rebase your branch on origin/develop, all your branch's commits are to be replayed on top of origin/develop, not the other way around.
Finally, the difference between merge and rebase scenarios has been described in details everywhere, including on this site, but very broadly the merge workflow will add a merge commit to history. For that last part, take a look here for a start.
QUESTION
We are experimenting with Jetbrains Space as our code repo and CI/CD. We are trying to find a way to setup the .space.kts file to deploy to AWS Lambda.
We want the develop branch to publish to the Lambda $Latest and when we merge to the main branch from the develop branch we want it to publish a new Lambda version and link that version to the alias pro.
I've looked around but haven't found anything that would suggest there is a pre-built solution for controlling AWS Lambda so my current thinking is something like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 11:09There is no built-in DSL for interacting with AWS.
If you want a solution that is more type-safe than plain shellScript, and maybe reuse data between multiple calls etc, you can still use Kotlin code directly (in a kotlinScript block instead of shellScript).
You can specify maven dependencies for your .space.kts script via the @DependsOn annotation, which you can use for instance to add modules from the AWS Java SDK:
QUESTION
I was working with a repo where both origin/master and master were in the same commit. I created several branches one on top of the other. Something like
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 04:30Yes. Depending on if the other branches have new commits:
- If the other branches have new commits of their own, simply check each one out and
git rebase origin/master. - If the other branches don't have new commits of their own, while on a branch you wish to duplicate, you can just re-create the others with
git branch -f branchDothis, etc. for each branch. Note you could delete them and recreate them, or use the-fflag which mean "force create even if it already exists". The end result is the same.
QUESTION
I have two branches, master and feature.
feature branch is derived from master branch and has 3 more commits. It has uncommitted changes as well.
At this point, I was going to update the master with these uncommitted changes.
So I did git checkout master but it throws me an error Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by checkout.
What I can't understand is that sometimes I was able to switch the branch with uncommitted changes, and sometimes I wasn't.
- Could you anyone let me know when I can and can't switch the tab with uncommitted changes ?
- And in my above situation, how can I update the master branch for only those uncommitted changes?
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 08:16What I can't understand is that sometimes I was able to switch the branch with uncommitted changes, and sometimes I wasn't.
Because there are currently common files between master and features: switching branches would mean overriding the current modification on those common files, which Git actively prevents.
If there are no common files (like new private files in feature, not yet added/committed), then you can switch back and forth between branch.
Do add and commit first (or git stash), then switch branch (with git switch rather than git checkout (since Git 2.23).
If you want to update master only with the new changes (and not the previous 3 commits), I would recommend, especially if you are the only one working on feature, to do an interactive rebase of feature first, in which you reorder commits, and put the last one first:
QUESTION
I am a member of my company organization. SSH keys associated with my account. Nothing works as expected. I am trying to push my branch
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 07:34First, make sure that https://github.com/mycomp/repo-pr does exist (meaning the case, uper or lower, of the URL is correct)
Second, check that you are correctly authenticated by GitHub through SSH:
QUESTION
I have a workflow which creates a new branch with a name that I save as an env variable. the reason is I need the workflow to run on a new clean branch.
1 Job after that I want to check out the branch. the problem is I cant seem to use env variables on the "ref" in order to check it out.
is there a way to do this ? or does github not support this yet.
example code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-13 at 10:33This question asked the same thing.
What you want to use here are not env variables but outputs.
You can specify a set of outputs that you want to pass to subsequent jobs and then access those values from your needs context.
See documentation:
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 06:23The question is what are you trying to achieve.
keep all the commits on feature branch, only rebase them on top of develop branch
In this case you did exactly right. You rebase feature branch on top of develop branch and you must resolve all conflicts.
Squash feature branch on top of develop branch
In this case you can avoid resolving conflicts by:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install BRANCH
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
