ufw | minimalist framework for rapid server side applications | HTTP library
kandi X-RAY | ufw Summary
kandi X-RAY | ufw Summary
μFW is a minimalist framework for rapid server side applications prototyping and experimental work on [Unix-like][1] operating systems, primarily [Linux][2] and [macOS][3]. Those familiar with [Spring][4] or [Guice][5] may experience a strong deja-vu — dependency injection support was one of the →.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of ufw
ufw Key Features
ufw Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on ufw
QUESTION
I'm trying to install a package with pip on Ubuntu 18.04 as well as Ubuntu 20.04 using Anaconda. However, I end up with the following error message:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-21 at 18:24I eventually scanned through this one below, that although it's for Windows it actually worked on Ubuntu linux too!!
and the way to fix it is then simply disable ipv6 with the following commands, and done!
QUESTION
I have a react app hosted on AWS as two EC2 instances. One for the frontend(ReactJs) and other for the backend (NodeJs with MongoDB as the database). To put the website behind SSL, the frontend instance is wrapped under an application load balancer. All listeners are configured as per AWS documentation along with setting up the security and target groups. Route 53 has been also setup to allow all connections to the website to be routed to the https link which is working properly. Problem arises when I open my website and try to login. When this access is being made from the frontend server to the backend url, the above message is displayed in the Chrome console while in Firefox it gives the following error: "Cross-Origin Request Blocked: The Same Origin Policy disallows reading the remote resource at . (Reason: CORS request did not succeed)."
Also just to highlight that the issue is only when i've put the website under an SSL certificate. We have also setup two staging servers which do not have any SSL certificate and there's no issue while doing any activity such as login mentioned above. Please help me identify where i might be going wrong. I had also raised a technical ticket with AWS support but they have only confirmed that all settings related to the Load balancer and instances etc. are correct and have not been able to find the root cause. I have also tested the UFW for the Ubuntu instance which shows invalid so that is also not an issue.
Thanks, Pranay
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-31 at 11:43Created a separate application load balancer for the backend instance and then created a cloudfront distribution for this instance. The DNS name of the cloudfront can then be used to access the backend from the frontend.
QUESTION
I have a Linux VPS with docker installed, I ran an Nginx docker container on a specific port using flag -p, when I try connecting to it using VPS_IP:PORT always get Connection_Refused.
even using curl http://localhost:PORT
return connection refused.
Except for port 80, every other port refuses to connect, though ufw is disabled.
docker container command I used:
docker container run -d -it -p 83:83 --name container_name -v /home/.../:/container_path/ nginx
Any thoughts on how to solve this problem?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-26 at 11:48Correct docker container command is :
QUESTION
I am trying to install an Ansible Galaxy collection, but I need to force an older revision. According to the documentation, I tried to perform installation the following ways:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-25 at 18:34As stated in the front page of the repository of the role you are trying to install:
Ansible weareinteractive.ufw role
Source: https://github.com/weareinteractive/ansible-ufw#ansible-weareinteractiveufw-role
It is a role and not a collection.
Although the two syntaxes might lookalike, they actually don't totally have the same syntax.
For a role, first, you don't install them via
QUESTION
I have Droplet A and Droplet B running Django and Redis respectively. They're both on a VPC on digital ocean, and have public, and private ip addresses.
Below is my redis docker-compose. I'm trying to map the container redis port, to the host port, so I can connect to it via the VPC.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-19 at 03:39there is a issue between Docker and UFW. UFW does not control the ports opened by Docker and unfortuantely this state of affairs does not show up on ufw status as well. there are many proposed solutions on this which you can google up but the one that i found most useful for me is:
https://jorisvergeer.nl/2019/11/03/let-docker-and-ufw-work-nicely/
however, since you are on DigitalOcean, a simpler way might be to create a DigitalOcean Firewall which only allows the authorised IP to access Droplet B at the port allowed. after you setup the firewall, place Droplet B inside and that should control the traffic to Droplet B well.
QUESTION
I want to change the default port of mongodb so I did :
sudo nano /etc/mongod.conf
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-18 at 10:56Based on your mongod.conf
file, MongoDB will run on port 27042. When you run the command mongo
without parameter --port
, it will connect to the default port 27017 then you have the error.
I think this command mongo --port 27042
will work.
QUESTION
I am having an issue with Azure VM.
As you can see I successfully run my website using sudo dotnet TechKeeper.dll --urls="https://localhost:443"
and I keep the console open so it is still host my website.
I also have 443 exposed to the internet and running sudo ufw allow 443
.
But when I access through the internet https://23.102.114.31:443 is not accessible.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-10 at 01:22A Localhost bound IP won't expose to the external network, try to bind it with URL --urls="https://0.0.0.0:443"
. 0.0.0.0
which stands for all IP Addresses. You can access it internally and externally.
Also, you could check if any firewall blocked via Virtual machine---Connection troubleshoot---test inbound or outbound connection from Azure portal.
QUESTION
I am trying to learn how to use sockets to send files between pcs on my local network.
I am using ubuntu on my 'server' and my original plan was to create a ufw rule that allows all LAN connections but ask for a password when accepting the socket connection. That way only devices that are really supposed to communicate with the server would be accepted.
I do realise that creating ufw rules for static IPs would be an option but unfortunately I am dealing with dynamic IPs.
I have a text file of allowed keys on my 'server' and a text file containing one authentication key on the 'client'.
The server script looks like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-01 at 17:04While I cannot filter by IP it seems as if one must first accept the connection in order to authenticate the client. I only want devices that possess an allowed key ..
Since you want to authenticate a client based on actual data (the key or proof of possession of the key) then you must first have a connection able to transfer the data from the client. With TCP this means that you have to accept the connection.
... whether this leaves me open to any vulnerabilities.
This is the usual way to go but it leaves you open to denial of service attacks. Creating a new connection takes resources, so by opening lots of connections an attacker can exhaust server resources. If all resources are exhausted this way even valid users can no longer access the server. See for example the SYN flood attack.
Depending on the setup of the client additional protections can be added. But these are outside of the python application and mostly out of scope of this question. But to get some ideas see the section about countermeasures in the Wikipedia article.
QUESTION
Yesterday I tried to install Ejabberd first through souce code, and then with Ubuntu specific packages.
I guess I made a mess, because now I'm getting this threatening Crash dump
error.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-27 at 07:46Yesterday I tried to install Ejabberd first through souce code
Just curiosity: what problems did you find, that prefered to use the Ubuntu package?
Did you install from source code? If so, did you later uninstall it? Maybe uninstallation left some files there (there was some bug related to that in make uninstall)... it will help if you can take a look at the installation paths and remove the remaining ejabberd files and directories, specially the file ejabberdctl.
and then with Ubuntu specific packages
Well, it could be that both installations get mixed... or maybe the Ubuntu package has some problem unrelated to your previous installation. Keep all investigation lines open :)
{"init terminating in [do_boot",{undef,[{ejabberd_ctl,start,[],
This error message says that erlang cannot find the file ejabberd_ctl.beam, or that the file doesn't define the function start.
Just a wild idea: maybe you are running the "ejabberdctl" script from source installation (pointing to the old ejabberd beam files), but now you have the ejabberd beam files installed in a different location (by the Ubuntu package).
QUESTION
I'm using the microk8s with default ingress addons.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-24 at 09:18From your Ingress definition, I see you set-up as ingress class nginx
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install ufw
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page