camera_calibration | Accurate geometric camera calibration with generic camera | Camera library
kandi X-RAY | camera_calibration Summary
kandi X-RAY | camera_calibration Summary
Accurate geometric camera calibration with generic camera models
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of camera_calibration
camera_calibration Key Features
camera_calibration Examples and Code Snippets
def process_spider_exception(response, exception, spider):
# Called when a spider or process_spider_input() method
# (from other spider middleware) raises an exception.
# Should return either None or an iterable of Response,
def process_spider_output(response, result, spider):
# Called with the results returned from the Spider, after
# it has processed the response.
# Must return an iterable of Request, dict or Item objects.
for i in resu
def from_crawler(cls, crawler):
# This method is used by Scrapy to create your spiders.
s = cls()
crawler.signals.connect(s.spider_opened, signal=signals.spider_opened)
return s
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on camera_calibration
QUESTION
I am working with Turtlebots and ROS, and using a camera to find the pixel positions of a marker in the camera. I've moved over from simulations to a physical system. The issue I'm having is that the pixel positions in my physical system did not match the pixel positions in the physical system despite the marker and everything else being in the same position as in the simulations. There was a shift in the vertical pixel position by about 40 pixels when everything else like the height between the camera and marker, the marker position, and the distance between the marker and camera were the same in both the physical and simulated system. The simulated system does not need a camera calibration matrix, it is assumed to be ideal.
The resolution I'm using is 640x480, so the center pixels should be cx=320 and cy=240, but what I noticed in the camera calibration matrix I was using in the physical system was that the cx was around 318, which is pretty accurate, but the cy was around 202, which is far from what it should be. This also made me think that the shift in pixel positions in the vertical direction is shifted with about the same amount of pixels that I'm getting as an error.
So is it right to assume that the error in the center pixel in the calibration could be causing the error in the pixel positions?
I have been trying to calibrate a USB camera (Logitech C920 I think) and I've been using the camera_calibrator ROS package found here http://wiki.ros.org/camera_calibration to calibrate the camera. I think the camera calibration did not go that well, seeing as I always have a pretty big error in either cx or cy. Here are the calibration matrices.
First calibration matrix, used 15x10 vertices with size 0.25
Recalibrated but did not actually use this yet, calibrated with 8x6 size 0.25
Same as previous, some difference between the two
The checkerboards were on A4 papers.
Thanks in advance.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-21 at 23:46I believe the answer to your question is to answer how to perform a better camera calibration.
Quoting from Calib.io enter link description here:
- Choose the right size calibration target.
- Perform calibration at the approximate working distance (WD) of your final application.
- The target should have a high feature count.
- Collect images from different areas and tilts.
- Use good lighting.
- Calibration is only as accurate as the calibration target used. Use laser or inkjet printed targets only to validate and test.
- Per sample, proper mounting of calibration target and camera.
- Remove bad observations. Carefully inspect reprojection errors.
- Obtaining a low re-projection error does not equal a good camera calibration. Be careful of over fitting.
QUESTION
I have ROS installed on a Ubuntu 20.04 running ros_core and a Raspberry Pi running a camera node. I tried to run rosrun camera_calibration cameracalibrator.py --size 8x6 --square 0.108 image:=/cv_camera/image camera:=/cv_camera
I get the following error:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-14 at 18:47You have to find the calibrator file which is under /opt/ros/noetic/lib/camera_calibration/cameracalibrator.py and then run it manually.
QUESTION
I'm trying to compile camera_calibration on OSX 10.11 and after a few hurdles with a few X11 related dependencies I find myself still stuck with a few linking errors:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-15 at 22:11On macOS do not(!) develop against X11 / GLX. They are not natively supported! The X11 server for macOS supports only indirect GLX with limited functionality. You will get only sub par performance. And CUDA (used by libvis) is not supported.
On macOS all OpenGL development should use the native OpenGL
framework: https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/GraphicsImaging/Conceptual/OpenGL-MacProgGuide/opengl_contexts/opengl_contexts.html
However take note that OpenGL has been declared deprecated by Apple.
In short: You'll at least have to modify your program to use the macOS OpenGL framework, or even bite the bullet and accept that macOS is not a well supported platform for your application.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install camera_calibration
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page