Wireshark | FreeRDP Wireshark RDP Protocol Analyzer | Learning library
kandi X-RAY | Wireshark Summary
kandi X-RAY | Wireshark Summary
FreeRDP Wireshark RDP Protocol Analyzer
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of Wireshark
Wireshark Key Features
Wireshark Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on Wireshark
QUESTION
I'm trying to parse a DNS response using java. I'm following RFC-1035 for guidelines on how to send requests and receieve responses, the format that is.
According to said RFC the answer section of a response should look like so:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Apr-04 at 15:33My problem is that I can't seem to parse the NAME in the answer section. It seems to start with a pointer which makes no sense.
I probably know at lot less about this than you but am wondering why you say that? firstByte
is telling you there's a pointer and the following value (0x0c) shows you the offset of the name for compression purposes (if I've got that right). None of the other bits in the same byte as firstByte
is set so that can be ignored from the point of view of the offset value
QUESTION
I am currently trying to connect to an AWS REST API which requires at least TLS v1.2. The documentation stats that clients must also support cipher suites with perfect forward secrecy (PFS) such as Ephemeral Diffie-Hellman (DHE) or Elliptic Curve Ephemeral Diffie-Hellman (ECDHE).
When sending a GET
request using the HttpClient
, the connection simply times out. I have set the TLS version explicitely to TLSv1.2
like this:
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-30 at 12:52We finally found the reason for this. Windows did not have the required cypher suites enabled. We have used IISCrypto to enable the corresponding cypher suites and all is ok now.
It looks like it's possible to force .NET to TLS 1.2, even though it was not enabled on the server itself.
QUESTION
Summary:
While capturing USB traffic with wireshark, I see that devices enumerate properly when plugged in, but I never see the USB address getting assigned by the host.
Details:
I have tried this on both Windows 10 and Linux, and on several types of USB devices.
I plug in a device, and capture the USB traffic using Wireshark. I expect to see a Setup transaction, with the data packet containing bRequest = 0x05 (SET_ADDRESS) and the wValue word containing the address to be assigned. But I never see this.
The wireshark capture does show the other traffic I expect, like "GET DESCRIPTOR" request and response for the device, but no SET_ADDRESS.
The simplest device I have is a USB 1.1 mouse, and the wireshark capture (summary lines only) is below.
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-12 at 02:57After more searching and experimenting, I have an answer.
The Short Answer: Wireshark cannot show the USB address assignment transaction because it is not captured by the lower-level libraries used by wireshark.
The Full Story: For some reason, it seems that the USB libraries used by wireshark do not capture the address assignment. The Windows version of these libraries, usbpcap, acknowledges this and other limitations on the web page. I did not find a similar disclaimer for the Linux version, but I suspect that the same technical limitations would affect both versions, and that's why I did not see the address assignment in wireshark on either Windows or Linux.
To verify that the USB device enumeration was working even though not captured by wireshark, I programed a USB device on a TI ARM development board which had pins on the D+ and D- USB signal lines. I attached a logic analyzer and captured the enumeration sequence. The result was exactly as described in every USB tutorial. Here is the part of the enumeration sequence where the device address is assigned: After the token packet (with Setup Packet ID, still using address 0, endpoint 0), the Setup packet with a DATA0 PID contains in its payload the expected bRequest byte 0x05 (SET_ADDRESS) followed by the low byte of wValue, equal in this example to 0x26, the assigned address. Don't forget when looking at captures like this that the least significant bytes and bits come first. So to make sense of each byte, you need to flip the bit stream byte-by-byte before converting to the hex values. So 01100100b becomes 0010 0110 or 0x26.
QUESTION
I have this code to send multicast messages to a group. There are no errors while running the program but when I monitor packets in Wireshark the ethernet destination of my packets are of my default gateway instead of something like 01-00-5e-xx-xx-xx
The code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-10 at 14:07244.244.244.1 is not a valid multicast address.
Multicast address are in the range of 224.0.0.1 - 239.255.255.255. The address you're sending to is not in that range. So the outgoing MAC address is not a multicast MAC.
Change the destination IP to be in the range of multicast IP addresses and you'll see a proper multicast MAC address.
QUESTION
we are currently working with a cloud product that uses JSCH internally to connect to external sftp sources. Im investigating an connection reset exception that we are getting when trying to connect to azure sftp.
Using wireshark i determined that the problem occurs after we send the Client: Key Exchange Init. Establishing the same connection with filezilla we dont have this issue.
comparing the packages from jsch and filezilla i didn't see an obivious issue, but im not an expert on the ssh protocol. im gonna post both requests below if somebody could give me any pointers it would be greatly appreciated.
Request with JSCH (not working)
Request with Filezilla (working)
Response with Filezilla (working)
See below for the log output:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-03 at 08:09i wanted to post a quick update for anybody that is having the same issue, i opened a similiar question on the microsoft q&a site and looks like it's an issue on the azure side that they are working on fixing for GA Microsoft Q&A
QUESTION
Could you explain the "weird" behaviour? I'm running netcat on Linux, as a UDP echo server:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-16 at 12:24This is a ncat
limitation.
Let's use strace
to look into what ncat
is up to. Conveniently, strace
has -e
option to filter system calls, e.g. -e %net
for logging network-related syscalls. Let's start the server first:
QUESTION
I'm trying to send https web requests with Asio and OpenSSL. My code is working fine on most of the sites I tried it on, but on some others, I get an error during the handshake handshake: wrong version number (SSL routines, ssl3_get_record)
.
I've found some people having this issue because they were behind proxies or because they tried to connect to port 80 instead of port 443, but this is not the case here (as far as I know) because the exact same code (see below for minimal example) works for most of the sites I tried it on.
I've tried to check with wireshark to see if I could spot the difference between a case with and one without the error. Here what I found:
- when it works, TLSv1.2 or 1.3 is used, when it doesn't, it's TLSv1
- when it doesn't work, the DNS query shows a cloudfront cname redirection, but the endpoint used for the socket matches the redirection
Based on these observations, I know my code is capable of using TLSv1.3, and I thought that using TLSv1 was the issue. So I tried to force asio to use a version > 1 for TLS with asio::ssl::context::tlsv13_client
when creating the context, or by adding asio::ssl::context::no_tlsv1
to set_options, but wireshark still showed that a TLSv1 protocol was used.
For the second point, I'm not too familiar with web stuff, so I'm not sure what conclusion I can make about that, or even if it's relevant to the issue.
Minimal working example:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-11 at 18:00You need to be more specific about the server you are trying to connect to:
QUESTION
If set up a program with boost asio. Broadcasts are working fine, if only one network interface is present. However, if there are more network interfaces each broadcast is being sent on one interface only. The interface changes randomly. As observed by wireshark.
I'd expect each broadcast to go out on every interface.
Who's wrong? Me, boost or my understanding of how to use boost. Well, I'm aware, that the latter is the most probable :).
And how can I get the expected behavior.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-03 at 13:14As suggested by Alan Birtles in the comments to the question i found an explanation here: UDP-Broadcast on all interfaces
I solved the issue by iterating over he configured interfaces and sending the broadcast to each networks broadcast address as suggested by the linked answer.
QUESTION
I have a UDP sender program here:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-14 at 08:46When I tried to change the destination ip address to 255.255.255.255 [broadcasting?]
QUESTION
I want to create a named pipe ("mkfifo") with .net6 in Linux.
Using the class NamedPipeServerStream doesn't help me as it creates a socket file instead of a pipe.
This creates a socket :
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-06 at 08:08The only thing I found how to create a named pipe (mkfifo) from .net6 so far is with Mono:
https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/24390#issuecomment-384650120
You can use the Mono.Posix.NetStandard library on .NET Core to get access to the mkfifo POSIX command. This will allow your program to read/write to a FIFO/Unix named pipe.
To write in a named pipe, you can simply use FileStream like this:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install Wireshark
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page