shifter | Shifter - Linux Containers for HPC | Continuous Deployment library

You need to stub the form object and then validate the changes that happen in the function

You are using the uninitialized pointer

Your problem wasn't quite condensed enough to reproduce, or to see the desired output, but your basic approach is fine. You may run into issues with misspellings, in which case maybe use an edit distance with a threshold for determining whether to take out the stopword. Here's my version of your code that seems to do fine

You don't need the looping. From the documentation:

Ok so it wasn't a software issue, there was a problem with logic level converter (3.3v to 1.8v)

This is happening because of the inheritance, basically; inheritance isn't a concept that protobuf directly supports, so protobuf-net models inheritance via nested sub-objects; to avoid some complexity, when serializing this, protobuf-net always starts by writing the inheritance parts first - so: when serializing BasePaintHolder, it might serialize field 400 (the sub-type data for BaseSmokePaintHolder), then field 1 (materialId). This means that when it comes to deserialize, it has an obvious construction path, i.e. by the time it gets field data, it has already constructed the final concrete type.

This is fine, for protobuf-net to protobuf-net scenarios, but when we work with the same data in Java, it doesn't know or care about this, and elects to serialize in ascending field order, i.e. field 1, then field 400. It is explicit in the specification that fields may be out of order, but Java can choose to do whatever it wants.

So: now we take that data back to protobuf-net, and we see field 1 first; at that point, we have no clue what the final type will be, and nowhere (yet) to stick the data. With no better options, the library tries to use the base type BasePaintHolder as a placeholder until it can make better decisions, but it turns out that this type is abstract, so: even that fails.

So: that's the why, and some back-story. What can we do?

Well, the first thing we could try might be to remove the abstract, making it technically constructable. To prevent external code accidentally creating instances, you might also make the constructors protected, internal, or private protected (which means the intersection of protected and internal). We could also try using the SkipConstructor=true modifier on [ProtoContract].

If that doesn't work: it might be necessary to basically work with 2 different object models; one that is simple - essentially more like the Java version, perhaps by running your schema through https://protogen.marcgravell.com/ - and one that has the inheritance; use the simple version for deserialization (and optionally serialization, although that shouldn't matter), and then re-map the data in your own code to the actual model. The other option is for me to figure out a way of doing all this magically and automatically; which: isn't a small job.

The problem is in the my_multiplier module where you have multiple syntax errors. If you sign up for a free account on edaplayground and post your code there, you may see more helpful compile errors there.

You must not place a module instance inside an always block. These 2 lines must be moved outside the always:

Something like this should work:

I believe something like this should do what you're asking...