IFEM | IFEM - Isogeometric Toolbox for the solution of PDEs | Math library
kandi X-RAY | IFEM Summary
kandi X-RAY | IFEM Summary
The simulation toolbox is organized into a set of modules, organized as class hierarchies implemented in the C++ language. The top-level driver is organized in the class SIMbase and its sub-classes. These classes have methods for reading model data from an input file, to assemble the linearized algebraic system of equations resulting from the finite element discretization, and to solve that system. It also contains methods for writing a VTF-file with results. The core of the finite element implementation is contained in the class ASMbase and its sub-classes, which have methods for evaluating the element matrices involved and assembling them into the system matrices. There is typically one ASMbase object for each spline patch in the model. The physical problem-dependent data and methods are accessed via an abstract interface class, Integrand, through which the application programmer can implement the weak form of the underlying finite element problem.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of IFEM
IFEM Key Features
IFEM Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on IFEM
QUESTION
Is there a Common Lisp construct that is to labels
what defmethod
is to defun
? That is, I would like to use labels
(or something similar) to define several local functions that would have the same name but differ in parameters they accept and let the compiler choose among them.
As an MWE, I would like to achieve the following functionality
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-25 at 15:06I am not aware of a built-in functionality of that kind. However, such kind of feature is not hard to build from scratch, as long as other parts of OOP are not required (i.e., inheritance and other dispatching orders).
If you would never call (call-next-method)
in you method-labels
code (as you won't do in labels
code, it is just a matter of defining a dispatch table and dispatch "methods" accordingly. To break it down, it should be a local macro that:
- defines a local variable (
gensym
) as the dispatch table; - registers functions as closures together with its specialized lambda list into the dispatch table;
- register a local "generic" function, that when called, find the function to call from the dispatch table according to the parameters supplied.
And to find the function, you may or may not need to:
- sort the dispatch table (but if there is not
eql
specifier nor inheritance, this can be avoided) - write dedicated code to match against the specialized parameters for
&optional
,&key
, and other options of the lambda list (or you can usedestructuring-bind
, but you'll need to transform the specialized lambda list into a lambda list) - there might be tools for that, but I am unaware of.
In the simplest case where the number of parameters in the lambda list is fixed, the dispatch can be as plain as a few (e)typecase
.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install IFEM
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page