polycalc | PolyCalc : Polynomial Calculator | Math library
kandi X-RAY | polycalc Summary
kandi X-RAY | polycalc Summary
PolyCalc is a polynomial calculator. It calculates and expands polynomials, equations, and relations. It supports simple variable assignments for the ease of handling expressions.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of polycalc
polycalc Key Features
polycalc Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on polycalc
QUESTION
I'm trying to implement a grammar that allows multiplication by juxtaposition. This is for parsing polynomial inputs for a CAS.
It works quite well, except few edge cases, as far as I'm aware of. There are two problems I have identified:
- Conflict with other rules, e.g.,
a^2 b
is (erroneously) parsed as(^ a (* 2 b))
, not as(* (^ a 2) b)
. - yacc(bison) reports
28 shift/reduce conflicts
and8 reduce/reduce conflicts
.
I'm pretty sure properly resolving the first issue will resolve the second as well, but so far I haven't been successful.
The following is the gist of the grammar that I'm working with:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-28 at 02:45As indicated in the answer to the question you linked, it is hard to specify the operator precedence of juxtaposition because there is no operator to shift. (As in your code, you can specify the precedence of the production expr: expr expr
. But what lookahead token will this reduction be compared with? Adding every token in FIRST(expr) to your precedence declarations is not very scalable, and might lead to unwanted precedence resolutions.
An additional problem with the precedence solution is the behaviour of the unary minus operator (an issue not addressed in the linked question), because as written your grammar allows a - b
to be parsed either as a subtraction or as the juxtaposed multiplication of a
and -b
. (And note that -
is in FIRST(expr), leading to one of the possibly unwanted resolutions I referred to above.)
So the best solutions, as recommended in the linked question, is to use a grammar with explicit precedence, such as the following: (Here, I used juxt
as the name of the non-terminal, rather than expr_sequence
):
QUESTION
I am attempting to run a glm analysis using the following code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Oct-03 at 16:00Using your recently posted objects here (Abund, Traits, and Treatment) and comparing them with posted link's objects (abund, traits, and treatment), your fundamental issue is Traits does not contain numeric columns. Other issues include rownames()
and $
assignment.
Author's traits (numeric columns)
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install polycalc
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page