cracklib | CrackLib Library and Dictionaries | Dictionary library
kandi X-RAY | cracklib Summary
kandi X-RAY | cracklib Summary
CrackLib Library and Dictionaries.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of cracklib
cracklib Key Features
cracklib Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on cracklib
QUESTION
I have heard its a conventional practice to store program dependent files in /usr/share/application-folder
in linux. So I'm trying to do it in my c program in a function called load_interface_files()
for example. I am not sure if this is a good practice or not, I've heard about creating configuration files for this kind of issues.
Anyways, here's the the code I wrote to make a directory in /usr/share
.
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-01 at 04:25use ls -ld /usr/share
to see what the permissions on the directory are (without -d
, you get the contents and their permissions).
Use code like:
QUESTION
I have list of packages like this (it's bigger than this):
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-03 at 23:13try this regex :
QUESTION
I have a docker container running where I want to install a package. Container is bebian based without Package Managers.
The output of cat /proc/version
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-28 at 16:35After a little search through above list found that I have microdnf
. Which helped in installing other package managers. after installing a package manager installed tar
.
QUESTION
I have a container I'm deploying to Kubernetes (GKE), and the image I have built locally is good, and runs as expected, but it appears that the image being pulled from Google Container Registry, when the run command is changed to pwd && ls
returns the output shown here:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-18 at 19:05The solution comes from the original intent of the docker-compose.yml
file which was converted into a kubernetes manifest via a tool called kompose
. The original docker-compose file was intended for development and as such had overrides in place to push the local development environment into the running container.
This was because of this in the yml file:
QUESTION
I am trying to add PAM support to my embedded Linux build. I am using a the Rocko version of the Yocto project. I added DISTRO_FEATURES_append += " pam" to my build. In my build I see the pam.d folder as expected. In my /lib/security folder I see many of the expected modules like pam_unix.so and pam_group.so. What I do NOT see is the pam_cracklib.so module. I looked at the BB recipe for pam given by the Rocko release and I see that it depends on cracklib and the supplied cracklib recipe is run.
I must be missing something basic. Why do I not see the pam_cracklib.so module available? I also verified it is not in some other folder.
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-03 at 07:14libpam recipe uses dynamic packaging to put each plugin into its own package. You need to add the correct package into your image: it should be pam-plugin-cracklib-
-- check e.g. the $WORKDIR/packages-split/ directory to see what packages were built.
QUESTION
I am having issues installing packer onto the EC2 machine. I have downloaded the Linux packer binary file on my Windows PC and uploaded it to the instance.
I put it into the directory ~/packer_new
, and have been trying two different ways for adding it to the path because it produces this error:
/usr/share/cracklib/pw_dict.pwd: Permission denied
/usr/share/cracklib/pw_dict: Permission denied
When I run just the packer
command.
On the packer website, it states
To fix this, you can create a symlink to packer that uses a different name like packer.io, or invoke the packer binary you want using its absolute path, e.g. /usr/local/packer.
I have done the first part by creating a symbolic link using this command:
sudo ln -s packer_new/packer /usr/bin/packer.io
And when I run the packer
command again, it still produces the same error. Am I supposed to be running a different command?
And the second way is to add the path to ~/.bash_profile
:
export PATH=$PATH:~/packer_new/
Note that I also have another PATH variable in the bash_profile for bin:
PATH=$PATH:$HOME/.local/bin:$HOME/bin
, not sure if this will affect setting PATH to packer...
But by adding the path, it also produces the same error when running packer
.
How can I fix this?
One more question, what does it mean when they say:
...invoke the packer binary you want using its absolute path, e.g. /usr/local/packer.
ANSWER
Answered 2017-Aug-19 at 12:58And when I run the packer command again, it still produces the same error. Am I supposed to be running a different command?
Run packer.io
and you link command is wrong. You should do sudo ln -s $HOME/packer_new/packer /usr/bin/packer.io
And the second way is to add the path to
~/.bash_profile
:export PATH=$PATH:~/packer_new/
You have to put the path to the front of the PATH
. I.e.
export PATH=$HOME/packer_new:$PATH
invoke the packer binary you want using its absolute path, e.g. /usr/local/packer.
It means that you can always run with the absolute path. In your case $HOME/packer_new/packer
.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install cracklib
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page