ECDICT | Free English to Chinese Dictionary Database | Dictionary library
kandi X-RAY | ECDICT Summary
kandi X-RAY | ECDICT Summary
Free English to Chinese Dictionary Database.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Exports missing words to a file
- Dump a dictionary
- Commit transaction
- Encode a text
- Load data from a CSV file
- Load text from file
- Export a wordmap to a file
- Decode a text
- Convert a dictionary to another
- Opens a dictionary
- Exports the word map from a wordmap file
- Creates a new progress indicator
- Import discrepancies from a dictionary
- Return a list of the given word
- Return the detail of a word
- Delete all rows from the database
- Build an MDX file
- Remove key from stardict
- Remove a key from the stardict
- Extract position from word
- Save rows to a CSV file
- Import a tab - separated text file
- Updates a list of items
- Set the detail of a word
- Read an MDD file
- Opens a local file
ECDICT Key Features
ECDICT Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on Dictionary
QUESTION
Since Python 3.7, dictionaries are ordered. So why I can't get keys by index?
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-26 at 21:57Building in such an API would be an "attractive nuisance": the implementation can't support it efficiently, so better not to tempt people into using an inappropriate data structure.
It's for much the same reason that, e.g., a linked list rarely offers an indexing API. That's totally ordered too, but there's no efficient way to find the i'th element for an arbitrary i. You have to start at the beginning, and follow i links in turn to find the i'th.
Same end result for a CPython dict. It doesn't use a linked list, but same thing in the end: it uses a flat vector under the covers, but basically any number of the vector's entries can be "holes". There's no way to jump over holes short of looking at each entry, one at a time. People expect a[i] to take O(1) (constant) time, not O(i) time.
QUESTION
I have a dictionary of the form:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-21 at 05:50I believe this will work:
For each list, we will filter the values where conf is negative, and after that we will filter conf itself.
QUESTION
Given a dict:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-21 at 15:47You could use a Series and explode:
QUESTION
I confronted strange behavior in Dictionary collection in Julia. a Dictionary can be defined in Julia like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-29 at 19:41The key order in Dict is currently undefined (this might change in the future).
If you want order to be preserved use OrderedDict from DataStructures.jl:
QUESTION
I have an odd problem, where I am struggling to understand the nature of "static context" in Java, despite the numerous SO questions regarding the topic.
TL;DR:
I have a design flaw, where ...
This works:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-26 at 17:11One way to solve the issue is by parameterizing the ParentDTO Class with its own children.
QUESTION
The question in the title pretty much says it all. The catch is that T cannot be restricted.
Here is what I have tried:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-05 at 18:55If you want the compiler to make calling toMap() an error if T isn't assignable to [K, V] for some K and V, then in some sense it doesn't matter what the output type is in such a case. It could be Map or Map or anything, as long as the toMap() call is a compiler error. I think you'll end up with a runtime error (you can wade through the spec if you really care) so the function won't return... the "actual" return type is never which can be safely widened to Map or anything you want without causing a type safety issue.
Anyway, to make the compiler error happen, you can give toMap() a this parameter which requires this be of ArrayWrapper<[any, any]> or something equivalent. You could use conditional type inference to manually infer K and V from T:
QUESTION
To know a key k exist in a map M1[k]v is very straightforward in Go.
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-02 at 18:04Use if _, ok := M1[k]; ok { }. If you use the blank identifier, the value will not be "loaded".
Let's write benchmarks to test it:
QUESTION
I have documents in collection which have structure:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-05 at 08:43Here is a possibility (requires Mongo 4.2 or better):
QUESTION
macro test1(name,arg)
println(arg.args[2])
typeof(arg.args[2])
end
@test1 test1 (
(arg1, (:max=>10))
)
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-06 at 05:49This is because macros work on code before the code is compiled. Source code is first parsed to Symbols, literals (integers, floats, strings, etc), or Expr (expressions). At this point, all expressions contain only these three things.** After the macro is done and returns an expression, that expression is compiled into runtime code where more complicated objects like Dicts can exist.
The code below illustrates the difference before and after compiling. Note how 1+5 and Dict() were expressions in the macro body, but is afterward evaluated to an Int64 and a Dict.
QUESTION
I would like to convert a NamedTuple to a Dict in Julia. Say I have the following NamedTuple:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-30 at 13:52The simplest way to get an iterator of keys and values for any key-value collection is pairs:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install ECDICT
You can use ECDICT like any standard Python library. You will need to make sure that you have a development environment consisting of a Python distribution including header files, a compiler, pip, and git installed. Make sure that your pip, setuptools, and wheel are up to date. When using pip it is generally recommended to install packages in a virtual environment to avoid changes to the system.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
