Interception | Interception API aims to build a portable programming | iOS library

This is my df:

Hi I am kinda new to spark and I am not sure how to approach this.

I have 2 tables (way smaller for easier explanation):

A:Weather Data

B:travel data

I need to join these tables by finding the closest station when the trip started in the same date and do the same when the trip ended. so at the end I have all the weather data from the station at the time the trip started and when the trip finished, and just one row for each trip with the data from the closest weather station.

i have done something similar with geopandas and udf but it was way easier because i was looking for an interception. like this:

I'm doing some testing and I intercept some api calls to the same url, I do one beforeEach, and then another one on the test, but for some reason I does not understand that I changed the alias. I was doing some reading, and the overriding was fixed, but apparently is not? Please feel free to ask more questions. Hope I can get some input.

My code:

I'm running Keycloak 15.0.2 in docker (jboss/keycloak:15.0.2) and use Identity Brokering with an external OpenId Connect Identity Provider

When a login is initialized on keycloak the browser is redirected to the external IDP. After authenticated there the browser is redirected to keycloaks broker endpoint /broker/oidc/endpoint?code=xxx

But then Keycloak throws a Exception caused by

Caused by: java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException: HMACSHA256 Signature not available

Has someone an idea why this is happening? Should this HMACSHA256 algorithm not already be part of the JRE in the docker-container?

Full stacktrace

I want to change HTTP Status Code to 503 with a custom response body on URL ending with .mpd. I am using Requestly chrome extension to intercept the request and have it failed with 503.

Here is the Modify API Response rule screenshot

Here's Requestly logs in devtools which shows that request was correctly intercepted.

The rule looks like it kicks in but is not showing the correct response code. Looking at the network tab it looks like the interception did not work

Need help with mocking the status code to 503 and custom response body.

I am new to the OAuth world and I am trying to understand the benefits of using PKCE over traditional Authorization code grant. (Many of my assumptions could be wrong, so I would thank for your corrections.)

I am a mobile app developer and according to OAuth documentation, client secrets can't be hardcoded in public clients' app code. The reason to avoid hardcoding the client secret is that a hacker could decompile my app and get my client secret.

The hacker with my client secret and my redirect_url, could develop a fake application. If a final user (User1) downloads the real application and the hacker's application (both), the fake application could listen to the real application callback and get the authorization code from it. With the authorization code (from the callback) and the client secret (stolen by decompiling my app), the hacker could get the authorization token and the refresh token and be able to get for example User1's data.

If other users download the real and the fake application, their data would also be in danger. Am I right? Would the hacker need both or could he/she do an attack only with the authorization code? Does the fifth step of the image requires the client secret and authorization code?

The attack is called interception attack.

To solve the the problem of hardcoding client secrets in the public client app and make it impossible for hackers to get the client secret and steal tokens, PKCE was invented. With PKCE, the client app code doesn't need to have the client secret hardcoded as PKCE doesn't need that information to get the tokens of the final users.

The PKCE flow creates a random string, transforms it to a SHA-256 hash value and to Base64. In the second point of the image, that encoded string is sent to the authentication server with the client id. Then the authorization code is sent in the callback and if any malicious app intercepts the code, it wouldn't be able to get the tokens as the fifth point of the image needs the original random string that was created by the legitimate app.

That is great, but if the client secret isn't need any more to get the tokens to access User1 data, how can I avoid a hacker developing a fake app which use PKCE flow with my client id and getting the tokens of the users who think that app is the legitimate one?

As the fifth step of the image don't need any more the client secret to get the tokens, anyone could develop fake apps using my public client id, and if any user downloads the fake app and do the OAuth flow, the hacker could get its tokens and access that users data!

Am I right?

I need to insert static data in DATABASE during migration. so in my migration file I am adding one insert query but this is unfortunately giving error. same sql query running properly in mysql console.

I have Cypress tests that run with local mocks/fixtures using cy.intercept.

I'd like to reuse these tests to run against a production URL and disable the network interception so that the tests run against real APIs.

Is these a way to disable all cy.intercepts, or am I thinking in the wrong direction?

I'm used to using WildFly for Java/Jakarta EE development and lately I wanted to update a project that is using JAAS for authentication/authorization to the new Jakarta Security API from Jakarta EE 9.1.

I couldn't make it work, so I decided to create the simplest example possible and experiment on different application servers. I took an example from Soteria (as I understand, the reference implementation for Jakarta Security) and created a new Jakarta EE project to deploy on my application servers. The code is available here.

The example includes a very simple identity store for a user reza with password secret1: