ngi | Native Graphics Interface - Modern attempt | Graphics library

Probably you’re getting the first value, when schedules is still null. Try this:

Assuming you are trying to check whether your rail[x].index[b] is either of ('WD' | 'POT' | 'NGI') on each iteration,

Try the below snippet if it is the case,

The short answer is No. These are two separate aspects. Here:

You want to split words into syllables, and syllables start with a consonant sequence and then end in a vowel.

Vowel pattern: a(?:[iu](?!(?:${consonant})+\b))?|o(?:i(?!(?:${consonant})+\b))?|[aeiou]
Consonant pattern: kh|n[yg]|sy|[bcdfghjklmnpqrstvwxyz]

The regex scheme for a syllable is (?:${consonant})*(?:${vowel})(?:(?:${consonant})*(?=[^a-zA-Z]|$)|(?>${consonant})(?=(?:${consonant})))?, but JS regex does not support atomic groups (see (?>${consonant})). So, you need to emulate it using a positive lookahead with a capturing group and a backreference after it ((?=(${consonant}))\1).

Here is the JS demo:

If the validity of a transaction is achieved just by adding the required endorsing peers in the channel initialisation, what is the point of enforcing endorsement rule? If org1 somehow manages to get the peer details of of org2, org1 can commit transactions without having consent from org2?

1. Endorsing peers are the peers where the chaincodes are installed. Now when your client sends the transaction proposal for endorsement,It first checks the endorsement policy on the fabric run-time. in your case it was AND('Org1MSP.peer','Org2MSP.peer') which means both of the endorsers should return the proposal response but you had just one peer on the channel,so it fails in the 1st step itself where it doesn't meet the endorsement policy rule. **The enforcement of endorsement policy provides a way to manage the tampering of data by and one peer and double spending.**a very detailed overview over here.

2. As the network would be distributed I hardly thing any org can access the certs of any other Org.

P.S transaction signing is an automated process,non of the org would be having people to sign transactions manually.

Hope this helps.

And what is the point of setting the user who is submitting the transaction to the HFClient? Where and how that user context and its enrolment validated by fabric in the transaction process?

To know who is wanting to change the state of data in blockchain.for example when org1 wants to change the ownership of car then when the data is commited when would know who changed the ownership of the car.

Ideally I would expect if I have AND ('Org1MSP.peer','Org2MSP.peer') as endorsement policy and have an UI to submit the transaction, the user context set in the HFClient should have the 'Org1MSP.peer' signature and the users in org2 with 'Org2MSP.peer' should get notified about the transation submitted. The transaction should be committed only when any user with signature 'Org2MSP.peer' signs it. And all these should happen irrespective of how many peers I have used to initialise the channel. Is my expectation valid? If so how to achieve it with fabric JAVA SDK?

well the client just sends the transaction proposal i.e operation to be performed and metadata for it and signs it with its priavte key.The chaincode containers would be taking care of their own certs.There is no person in real who would be manually signing the transaction proposal,its an automated process executed by the endorsing peer.

To click() on the element with text as 0 - 3 years need to induce WebDriverWait for the desired element to be clickable and you can use either of the following solutions:

• Using LINK_TEXT:

I am able to fix this issue after upgrading my one of library i.e. ng-bootstrap.

Usually these type of error occurs, when we use some of old version dependencies.

It seems you can use Projections.Concat to solve your issue:

I think what you need definitely can be done with AOP Advices. More over with the chain of them, where indeed the RequestHandlerRetryAdvice should be first to start a retry loop. The next Advice I would suggest to use as ExpressionEvaluatingRequestHandlerAdvice with its onSuccessExpression and propagateOnSuccessEvaluationFailures = true combination. This way you perform that checksum validation in the onSuccessExpression and if it doesn't match, throw an exception. That exception is going to be caught by the previous in stack RequestHandlerRetryAdvice and the retry logic will be performed.

See their JavaDocs and Reference Manual on the matter.

Also we have some Sample project to understand things better.