AutoFake | Mock any type members including static and non-virtual ones | Mock library

by Serg046 C# Version: Current License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(3)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | AutoFake Summary

AutoFake is a C# library typically used in Testing, Mock applications. AutoFake has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Mock any type members including static and non-virtual ones

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

AutoFake has a low active ecosystem.

It has 34 star(s) with 4 fork(s). There are 3 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 36 open issues and 117 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 342 days. There are 4 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of AutoFake is current.

Quality

AutoFake has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

AutoFake has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

AutoFake code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

AutoFake is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

AutoFake releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of AutoFake

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

AutoFake Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for AutoFake.

AutoFake Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for AutoFake.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on AutoFake

Using AutoBogus to set member property value range

Why does calling AutoFake.Provide() wipe out fakes already configured with A.CallTo()?

Moq: How to mock a function in F# without a placeholder interface?

QUESTION

Using AutoBogus to set member property value range

Asked 2021-Oct-15 at 18:43

I have the following classes:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Oct-10 at 21:46

The original design of AutoBogus was to generate small object graphs for unit tests. Generating the numbers you require could have a performance impact. However, if the above is what you are trying to generate and nothing more complex, then it could be small enough to succeed.

To use AutoBogus out the box you can do the following:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69517783

QUESTION

Why does calling AutoFake.Provide() wipe out fakes already configured with A.CallTo()?

Asked 2021-Jun-12 at 02:41

Why does calling fake.Provide() wipe out fakes already configured with A.CallTo()? Is this a bug?

I'm trying to understand a problem I've run into with Autofac.Extras.FakeItEasy (aka AutoFake). I have a partial solution, but I don't understand why my original code doesn't work. The original code is complicated, so I've spent some time simplifying it for the purposes of this question.

Why does this test fail? (working DotNetFiddle)

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Jun-12 at 02:41

It isn't that the Fake's configuration is being changed. In the first test, Resolve is returning different Fakes each time it's called. (Check them for reference equality; I did.)

Provide creates a new scope and pushes it on a stack. The topmost scope is used by Resolve when it finds an object to return. I think this is why you're getting different Fakes in ACallTo_before_Provide.

Is this a bug? Or is this the expected behavior? If this is the expected behavior, can someone explain why it works like this?

It's not clear to me. I'm not an Autofac user, and don't understand why an additional scope is introduced by Provide. The stacked scope behaviour was introduced in PR 18. Perhaps the author can explain why.

In the meantime, if possible, I'd Provide all you need to before Resolveing, if you can manage it.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67943010

QUESTION

Moq: How to mock a function in F# without a placeholder interface?

Asked 2020-Jun-20 at 03:50

A colleague of mine needed to test whether some F# functions are called or not a given number of times.

In Moq, you can usually do that if you have a class with virtual members or an interface (unless if this has changed, but it doesn't seem to be the case), but afaik you can hardly mock static methods with Moq for example, which in most cases is how F# functions are compiled to, at least from an IL standpoint. Or, would require to use another library to do so like AutoFake or Pose and I'm not sure the F# support is actually properly implemented.

We ended up creating a CallCounter type, which would hold the function to invoke and a variable counting the number of times this function has been invoked (a bit similar to this answer but with an actual type).

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Jun-20 at 03:50

Unless I'm missing something, I don't see why you need any objects or interfaces. Since it's all just functions, you could make funDep just increment a locally declared mutable counter as a side effect:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62480722

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install AutoFake

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: