Mock | A simulation data generator | Mock library

 by   nuysoft JavaScript Version: 1.0.1-beta3 License: Non-SPDX

kandi X-RAY | Mock Summary

kandi X-RAY | Mock Summary

Mock is a JavaScript library typically used in Testing, Mock applications. Mock has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has medium support. However Mock has a Non-SPDX License. You can install using 'npm i trip-mockjs' or download it from GitHub, npm.

Mock.js is a simulation data generator to help the front-end to develop and prototype separate from the back-end progress and reduce some monotony particularly while writing automated tests. The official site:

            kandi-support Support

              Mock has a medium active ecosystem.
              It has 19038 star(s) with 2685 fork(s). There are 425 watchers for this library.
              It had no major release in the last 12 months.
              There are 305 open issues and 145 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 181 days. There are 30 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of Mock is 1.0.1-beta3

            kandi-Quality Quality

              Mock has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              Mock has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              Mock code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              Mock has a Non-SPDX License.
              Non-SPDX licenses can be open source with a non SPDX compliant license, or non open source licenses, and you need to review them closely before use.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              Mock releases are available to install and integrate.
              Deployable package is available in npm.
              Mock saves you 18 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.
              It has 52 lines of code, 0 functions and 41 files.
              It has low code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi has reviewed Mock and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into Mock implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.
            • convert to json schema
            • Returns a String .
            • Transform a list of children into a list .
            • Creates an XHRHttpRequest .
            • Find XMLHttpRequest .
            • Registers a module .
            • The ready event handler .
            • the function of reading a word .
            • do a number
            • parses a sequence
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            Mock Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for Mock.

            Mock Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for Mock.

            Community Discussions


            Change behaviour of AutoFixture with AutoMoq to return false for methods
            Asked 2022-Mar-31 at 09:22

            Say that I have the following interface:



            Answered 2022-Mar-26 at 16:40

            First of all, you may want to use AutoMoqDataAttribute to create a mock of the ITeam interface:



            The unauthenticated git protocol on port 9418 is no longer supported
            Asked 2022-Mar-27 at 13:23

            I have been using github actions for quite sometime but today my deployments started failing. Below is the error from github action logs



            Answered 2022-Mar-16 at 07:01

            First, this error message is indeed expected on Jan. 11th, 2022.
            See "Improving Git protocol security on GitHub".

            January 11, 2022 Final brownout.

            This is the full brownout period where we’ll temporarily stop accepting the deprecated key and signature types, ciphers, and MACs, and the unencrypted Git protocol.
            This will help clients discover any lingering use of older keys or old URLs.

            Second, check your package.json dependencies for any git:// URL, as in this example, fixed in this PR.

            As noted by Jörg W Mittag:

            There was a 4-month warning.
            The entire Internet has been moving away from unauthenticated, unencrypted protocols for a decade, it's not like this is a huge surprise.

            Personally, I consider it less an "issue" and more "detecting unmaintained dependencies".

            Plus, this is still only the brownout period, so the protocol will only be disabled for a short period of time, allowing developers to discover the problem.

            The permanent shutdown is not until March 15th.

            For GitHub Actions:

            As in actions/checkout issue 14, you can add as a first step:



            Making a JSX syntax for a MockComponent and have it typed with typescript
            Asked 2022-Mar-20 at 22:37

            Wondering if anybody has some good suggestions on how to crack this. Got this test helper utils I have added some types to:



            Answered 2022-Mar-20 at 22:37

            If you look at React without JSX, you'll see that the XML-inspired syntax () is just short for React.createElement('MockComponent').

            Right now, if you renamed mockComponent to MockComponent and tried using the angle bracket syntax, the first issue is that your function receives two arguments. React components are either class components that take one constructor argument (props) or functional components that take one argument (again, props). The second issue is that your function returns a React functional component, when it needs to return a rendered React element.

            One way to fix this issue is to convert mockComponent into a React functional component and make module and propOverride props of the FC.



            Can not instantiate proxy of class: System.Net.HttpWebRequest. Could not find a parameterless constructor
            Asked 2022-Feb-23 at 12:05

            I am upgrading my C# function app from .net 3.1 to 6.0`.

            When I run my test cases, I found that, 1 of my test case failed with the below error.

            Castle.DynamicProxy.InvalidProxyConstructorArgumentsException : Can not instantiate proxy of class: System.Net.HttpWebRequest. Could not find a parameterless constructor.

            Basically, I am trying to mock HttpWebRequest and below is my piece of code for that.



            Answered 2022-Feb-23 at 10:53

            Both HttpWebRequest constructors are obsolete and should not be used. You have to use the static function "Create" to create a new instance of the HttpWebRequest class:

            HttpWebRequest myReq = (HttpWebRequest)WebRequest.Create("");

            To solve your issue, use the HttpClient class instead. This class has a parameterless constructor.



            Apache Beam Cloud Dataflow Streaming Stuck Side Input
            Asked 2022-Jan-12 at 13:12

            I'm currently building PoC Apache Beam pipeline in GCP Dataflow. In this case, I want to create streaming pipeline with main input from PubSub and side input from BigQuery and store processed data back to BigQuery.

            Side pipeline code



            Answered 2022-Jan-12 at 13:12

            Here you have a working example:



            How to compare file paths from JsonConfigurationSources and Directory.GetFiles properly?
            Asked 2021-Dec-20 at 04:22

            I created an extension method to add all JSON configuration files to the IConfigurationBuilder



            Answered 2021-Dec-19 at 09:24

            The logic of comparing files seems alright, I don't find any outstanding problem with it, it is ok to prepend the "/" to match what you need. Could be even better if you could use the System.IO.Path.DirectorySeparatorChar for the directory root path as well, so if you run on windows or Linux you will have no issues.

            But there may be a conceptual problem with what you are doing. To my understanding you aim to verify existence of specific configuration files required for your program to work right, if those files are missing than the program should fail. But that kind of failure due to missing configuration files, is an expected and valid result of your code. Yet, you unit-test this as if missing files should fail the test, as if missing files are an indication that something wrong with your code, this is wrong.

            Missing files are not indication of your code not working correct and Unit-test should not be used as a validator to make sure the files exist prior executing the program, you will likely agree that unit-test is not part of the actual process and it should only aim to test your code and not preconditions, the test should compare an expected result (mock result of your code) vs. actual result and certainly not meant to become part of the code. That unit test looks like a validator that should be in the code.

            So unless those files are produced by your specific code (and not the deployment) there is no sense testing that. In such case you need to create a configuration validator code - and your unit test could test that instead. So it will test that the validator expected result with a mock input you provide. But the thing here is that you would know that you only testing the validation logic and not the actual existence of the files.



            How to get preview in composable functions that depend on a view model?
            Asked 2021-Dec-16 at 21:53
            Problem description

            I would like to have the preview of my HomeScreen composable function in my HomeScreenPrevieiw preview function. However this is not being possible to do because I am getting the following error:



            Answered 2021-Sep-07 at 16:48

            This is exactly one of the reasons why the view model is passed with a default value. In the preview, you can pass a test object:



            v0.8 AggregatorV3Interface.sol , its available in @chainlink/contracts?
            Asked 2021-Nov-05 at 21:48

            I get a error when i change the version to 0.8 , but works fine with 0.6, how i see the most recent version? , i tried downloaded from npm install @chainlink/contracts --save, but only works with mock mode.

            This is my repo:

            Compiling contracts... Solc version: 0.8.9 Optimizer: Enabled Runs: 200 EVM Version: Istanbul CompilerError: solc returned the following errors:

            ParserError: Source "C:/Users/irwin/.brownie/packages/smartcontractkit/chainlink-brownie-contracts@1.1.1/contracts/src/v0.8/interfaces/AggregatorV3Interface.sol" not found: File not found. --> contracts/Lottery.sol:4:1: | 4 | import "@chainlink/contracts/src/v0.8/interfaces/AggregatorV3Interface.sol"; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

            ERROR: Unable to load project



            Answered 2021-Nov-05 at 21:48

            "As of 1.2.0 and onward all the releases of this package are going to match the @chainlink/contracts NPM tags So it will look backwards, but we are starting with 0.2.1"

            Change: @chainlink=smartcontractkit/chainlink-brownie-contracts@1.1.1 To: @chainlink=smartcontractkit/chainlink-brownie-contracts@0.2.1




            Not able to mock a function inside useEffect
            Asked 2021-Oct-13 at 08:26

            I have a custom hook as below



            Answered 2021-Oct-13 at 05:27

            Because it's a named export you should return an object in the mock



            pytest/unittest: mock.patch function from module?
            Asked 2021-Sep-22 at 07:06

            Given a folder structure like such:



            Answered 2021-Sep-22 at 07:06

            Yeah. I also fought with this initially when I learned patching and mocking and know how frustrating it is as you seem to be doing everything right, but it does not work. I sympathise with you!

            This is actually how mocking of imported stuff works, and once you realise it, it actually makes sense.

            The problem is that import works in the way that it makes the imported module available in the context of where your import is.

            Lets' assume your module is in 'my_package' folder. Your code is available then as my_package.code. And once you use from dag_common.connections import get_conn in code module - the imported get_conn becomes available as .... my_package.code.get_conn

            And in this case you need to patch my_package.code.get_conn not the original package you imported get_conn from.

            Once you realise this, patching becomes much easier.


            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network


            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install Mock

            You can install using 'npm i trip-mockjs' or download it from GitHub, npm.


            If you have any questions, please feel free to ask through New Issue.
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries

            Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link