Verify | snapshot tool that simplifies the assertion of complex data | Testing library

Hi guys am a newbie in React when i start my project i get the Wepback V5 Error Message

Resolve updated : https://github.com/facebook/create-react-app/issues/11756#issuecomment-1001162736

This What am using!

I am using MongoDB(Mongo Atlas) in my Django app. All was working fine till yesterday. But today, when I ran the server, it is showing me the following error on console

Discussion about this was started under this answer for quite simple question.

This simple code has unexpected overload resolution of constructor for std::basic_string:

First, the question: is there a way to choose the platform (e.g. x86_64, AMD64, ARM64) for a GitHub Codespace?

Here's what I've found so far:

Attempt 1 (not working):

From within GitHub.com, you can choose the "machine" for a Codespace, but the only options are RAM and disk size.

Attempt 2 (EDIT: not working): devcontainer.json

When you create a Codespace, you can specify options by creating a top-level .devcontainer folder with two files: devcontainer.json and Dockerfile

Here you can customize runtimes, installed packages, etc., but the docs don't say anything about determining architecture...

...however, the VSCode docs for devcontainer.json has a runArgs option, which "accepts Docker CLI arguments"...

and the Docker CLI docs on --platform say you should be able to pass --platform linux/amd64 or --platform linux/arm64, but...

When I tried this, the Codespace would just hang, never finishing building.

Attempt 3 (in progress): specify in Dockerfile

This route seems the most promising, but it's all new to me (containerization, codespaces, docker). It's possible that Attempts 2 and 3 work in conjunction with one another. At this point, though, there are too many new moving pieces, and I need outside help.

1. Does GitHub Codespaces support this?
2. Would you pass it in the Dockerfile or devcontainer.json? How?
3. How would you verify this, anyway? [Solved: dpkg --print-architecture or uname -a]
4. For Windows, presumably you'd need a license (I didn't see anything on GitHub about pre-licensed codespaces) -- but that might be out of scope for the question.

References:
https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/remote/devcontainerjson-reference
https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/commandline/run/
https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/builder/
https://docs.docker.com/desktop/multi-arch/
https://docs.docker.com/buildx/working-with-buildx/

We're facing an issue where any event listeners or global variables we attach to window does not seem to be there in our production build (but they are there in the development build).

• Webpack config: https://gist.github.com/saadq/9f2f800c88716d11410e63859382f47d
• Build script: webpack --mode=production

Context:

We have a use case where our webapp renders inside a parent app. The parent app basically needs to tell us when we need to render our app. To do this, we have tried using event listeners as well as global functions.

To render our webapp inside the parent app, the following happens:

1. The parent app makes an HTTP call to myappwebsite.com/asset-manifest.json. This is like the default asset-manifest.json that gets created for any create-react-app webapp.
2. The parent app finds the path to the main bundle.js from this asset manifest, and then makes an HTTP call to fetch our bundle.js using this path (e.g. myappwebsite.com/bundle.js).
3. They dynamically inject a script tag into their head with its src set to our bundle.js to load our app's bundled javascript.
4. They listen for the onload event of this new script element before trying to call any of our code or dispatching any events.

Child app:

First, I tried to load using:

I am aware that Let's Encrypt made changes that may impact older clients because a root certificate would expire. See DST Root CA X3 Expiration (September 2021).

However, I didn't think this could impact me because my development machine is up-to-date.

But since today I get the message while doing a git pull:

We are using firebase phone authentication to authenticate our users. We've been using it for over a year now.

Today at 13:00 GMT, new users are receiving 17028 An invalid safety_net_token was passed after entering their phone number.

I tried to verify each of the causes I found on the firebase docs:

1. Verifying the SHA1 and SHA256 on the firebase console (We use the fingerprints that are on the play store console)
2. Verifying the package name

The last app update was on October 1st and since then thousands of users created an account with Firebase Auth and there were no configuration changes on the firebase console.

Upon looking at other StackOverflow questions, the error we are getting is not the same as 17028 A safety_net_token was passed, but no matching SHA-256 was registered in the Firebase console. Please make sure that this application's packageName/SHA256 pair is registered in the Firebase Console Even though it is the same error code, in our case, it says an invalid token was passed.

We are using firebase with react-native-firebase module.

EDIT: After disabling Android device verification API from Google Cloud Console the verification is now working but with no device verification. (Users have to verify they're not robots with a CAPTCHA).

I was trying to verify in a static_assert that a program had really two distinct classes produced from a template by comparing the pointers on their static fields. After some simplifications the program looks as follows: