AutoMoq | Auto mocking provider for Moq | Mock library

 by   darrencauthon C# Version: 2.0.0 License: MIT

kandi X-RAY | AutoMoq Summary

kandi X-RAY | AutoMoq Summary

AutoMoq is a C# library typically used in Testing, Mock applications. AutoMoq has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

AutoMoqer is an "auto-mocking" container that creates objects for you. Just tell it what class to create and it will create it.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              AutoMoq has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 161 star(s) with 39 fork(s). There are 11 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 12 months.
              There are 7 open issues and 14 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 287 days. There are 4 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of AutoMoq is 2.0.0

            kandi-Quality Quality

              AutoMoq has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              AutoMoq has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              AutoMoq code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              AutoMoq is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              AutoMoq releases are available to install and integrate.
              Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.
              AutoMoq saves you 54320 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.
              It has 62621 lines of code, 0 functions and 44 files.
              It has low code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of AutoMoq
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            AutoMoq Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for AutoMoq.

            AutoMoq Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for AutoMoq.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Change behaviour of AutoFixture with AutoMoq to return false for methods
            Asked 2022-Mar-31 at 09:22

            Say that I have the following interface:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Mar-26 at 16:40

            First of all, you may want to use AutoMoqDataAttribute to create a mock of the ITeam interface:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71626344

            QUESTION

            How to Run Unit Tests When using inline data with Automoq and Autofixture
            Asked 2022-Mar-23 at 16:39

            I created some unit tests on an existing project. I am using AutoMoq to inject data into some of the tests. Upon running the test, it complains of recursion error. I solved the error using the below code:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Mar-23 at 16:39

            This post https://stackoverflow.com/a/70957998/3036650 solved my challenge on this question. The issue has to do with circular reference caused when using Entity framework. So the code can totally replace or be added to the content of customize method in the OmitRecursionCustomization class. The class looks like this now:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71326161

            QUESTION

            AutoFixture AutoMoq partially covers class constructor
            Asked 2022-Jan-26 at 08:09

            I am using AutoFixture AutoMoq and it's greatly simplifies the mock for all interface used in class and initialize it.

            Though I noticed the constructor code is partially covered, can we modify AutoMoqDataAttribute so that constructor ArgumentNullException can also be covered?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Jan-26 at 08:09

            It is not the responsibility of the AutoDataAttribute to know how to cover your code. It is the developers responsibility to express intent and explicitly cover the scenario.

            In your case the uncovered branches are the null guards. Luckily AutoFixture provides a library just for that, AutoFixture.Idioms.

            This library provides idiomatic assertions, that encapsulate most basic test scenarios like null guards, property setters, equality members and so on.

            Using this library you can write a test like the following.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70849199

            QUESTION

            Provide real AutoMapper instance to AutoFixture
            Asked 2021-Jul-12 at 07:39

            I'm using AutoFixture in my unit tests. The SUT is using AutoMapper. During execution of the unit test, I noticed that IMapper (interface of AutoMapper) was getting mocked by AutoFixture and thus disregarding any mapping profiles I have in my code.

            So I wrote a customization to be able to pass in an IMapper instance so that AutoFixture will not mock this interface. But now it looks like that AutoFixture won't mock any other interfaces as well. This used to work before I introduced the AutoMapper customization.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jul-12 at 07:39

            AutoFixture can only build upon the testing framework only as much as it allows itself to be extended. In xUnit 2 each provided DataAttribute is considered, a distinct provider of arguments for the test, which is why they are isolated during runtime.

            The recommended option here is to create a data attribute that will apply both AutoMoq and the AutoMapper customization.

            You can achieve this by using a CompositeCustomization and then using it in a custom AutoDataAttribute implementation.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68326247

            QUESTION

            How to auto inject mocked types defined in test parameters into SUT using AutoFixture AutoMoq
            Asked 2021-Jun-28 at 02:18

            Let's say that I have the following code example:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-28 at 02:18

            Based on the following article I would suggest refactoring your test

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68156736

            QUESTION

            Some unit tests runs indefinitely
            Asked 2021-May-18 at 09:24

            In a solution, I have 600 unit tests splitted in various libraries, and 450 of them are present in a single library. When running the tests on that specific library on my computer using Visual Studio (last version), everything goes well. But, on our build server, some tests never ends using the dotnet.exe test command.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-May-18 at 09:24

            I finally found the issue.

            Using the "Parallel Stacks" tool (Debug -> Windows -> Parallel Stacks) of Visual Studio, I was able to locate the class/method where the deadlock occured.

            Multiple tests where calling this methods :

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67571322

            QUESTION

            How do I set up methods on mocks to return null by default?
            Asked 2021-May-08 at 20:51

            I am using AutoFixture with AutoMoq to mock my dependencies in a unit test like this

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-May-08 at 20:51

            The suggestion from the comments was close. The part that was missing is setting the CofnigureMembers property on AutoMoqCustomization to true so that AutoFixture can resolve the instances of the members.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67340325

            QUESTION

            Moq + Autofixture: Using Setup for a dependant property clears the entire mock object
            Asked 2021-Mar-02 at 23:53

            I am using Moq and AutoFixture.

            Given the following interfaces:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Mar-02 at 23:53

            To put it simply, you end up with a different mock instance for the Int2 property, after you set the return value for the Prop1 property. To fulfill your request Moq will generate a new mock, that will return the expected value for Prop1.

            You can look at it as being equivalent to the following test:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66425686

            QUESTION

            How to mock SearchClient.SearchAsync with the Azure Cognitive Search SDK?
            Asked 2020-Oct-01 at 23:39

            I am trying to unit test code that uses SearchClient.SearchAsync() method. I am using AutoFixture.AutoMoq nuget package.

            Here is what I tried:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Oct-01 at 23:39

            See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-net/blob/master/sdk/core/Azure.Core/README.md#mocking for information. Basically, you can use Response.FromValue along with the SearchModelFactory (a pattern we follow with all our Azure.* client SDKs for models that can't be fully mocked with a constructor and/or settable properties) to create a mock like so (using Moq, since I'm unfamiliar with AutoMoq, but should be similar):

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64160007

            QUESTION

            Automatically return fixture values from mocked generic functions?
            Asked 2020-Aug-24 at 20:08

            My tests use Moq and AutoFixture, and often they are very verbose because they have many mock Setup() calls to configure mocks to return values created by AutoFixture. To make the tests easier to read and maintain I am trying to use AutoMoqCustomization with the ConfigureMembers feature to avoid unnecessary Setup() calls.

            Mostly this is working as expected, however I have some interfaces with generic functions (AutoMapper mostly) that the AutoMoqCustomization does not seem to handle. Instead of returning an instance of the type from AutoFixture I receive a mocked instance.

            I can achieve the behavior that I want by including a Setup() call for the generic function, but my goal was to remove as many of these Setup calls as possible.

            I have set up the example below to reproduce the problem (in practice I am using AutoFixture to inject an IMapper instance via the constructor of another object, and that object makes the call to the IMapper interface, but that is not necessary to see the problematic behavior).

            What I expect is for the call to sut.Map() to work like the call to sut.Map(), returning the instance of object frozen in the fixture. Instead in variable retB I see an instance of ObjectProxy.

            Including the commented line in the example that sets up the return value for Map() will cause the test to pass, but I would prefer to omit this call in the same way that I can omit the Setup() call for Map().

            Are generic functions supposed to auto-configured? Am I setting it up incorrectly?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Aug-24 at 20:08

            Indeed, generic methods aren't currently supported by the AutoMoq customization in autofixture, due to a limitation of how it's written, but there's an issue/PR that would integrate it: https://github.com/AutoFixture/AutoFixture/issues/1139

            As far as I can tell, it's just not merged yet because it would pull in a higher Moq dependency version. It makes use of the relatively-recently introduced DefaultValueProvider property of Moq to delegate all the 'default value' duties to AutoFixture instead of having Moq recursively introduce mocked objects. Sounds like exactly what you want.

            From the issue, here's an example of what it would look like to use if you were to introduce a customization similar to the one that the pull request introduces:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63567913

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install AutoMoq

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries

            Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link