Depot | application type the following commands | Continuous Deployment library

Sounds like the table was created some time in the past from a SELECT query that didn't define column aliases.

First I would urge you to change the column names to something easier to use. You can use columns whose names contain special characters but it's unnecessarily difficult.

MySQL 8.0 supports a RENAME COLUMN option:

It's difficult to debug this without access to specific files. However, you can attempt to specify the columns you want to read using the cols_only function. For example, let's assume that you only want to read the mpg column. You can do that in the following manner:

From the looks of it, either you've mispelled the table name Parametre or you don't have a table with that name in your database. You should run a CREATE TABLE statement to create the table somewhere before (or, if you have it in your code, it has not been run or contains some other error).

It may help you knowing that sqflite provides two great arguments to its openDatabase method: onCreate and onUpdate. They allow you to call a custom function when the database is created (a simple way to create all the tables your app needs at the first run) and another different function to update your database by adding tables or altering columns if you just provide a coherent version argument to the same openDatabase function.

Assuming your payload is always going to be what you provided (not nested structure) then you can use Map function to iterate over your payload and then filterObject to achieve your desired output

You mentioned transport priorities. These are only used for the decision if an order is planned at all. It is not used for the decision where it is planned in the route.

To achieve your goal, you can use the routeSectionNumber. It specifies the relative position of a customer location in a route. Note that this is a field at the location, not at the transport. Using this field you get the desired result:

With custom start and ends, you should use Routing.Start(vehicle_index) and Routing.End(vehicle_index) to get the index of these nodes.

I find the error, it comes from the routing rule of odata v8.

The construction of the relationship between endpoints and OData routing template is based on a set of rules, such rules are called OData Routing Convention. For example, “CustomersController” is an OData controller when the controller name “Customers” is an entity set in a given Edm model. “EntitySetName + Controller” is one of the OData controller name convention.

That means we need to make the controller name and EdmModel keep consistent. For example, here's my EdmModel setting in startup:

Q: "The module shell shows changed every time I run it"

A: In async mode the task can't be skipped immediately. First, the module shell must find out whether the file /opt/assure1/logs/SetupWizard.log exists at the remote host or not. Then, if the file exists the module will decide to skip the execution of the command. But, you run the task asynchronously. In this case, Ansible starts the module and returns without waiting for the module to complete. That's what the registered variable Assure1InstallWait says. The task started but didn't finish yet.

Your question did not make clear whether the network needed to include one depot per gate (and 5 connecting nodes and 2 parking lots per gate), or just one of each. I couldn't figure it out from the code in the question either, because the nested for loops seem to indicate one depot per gate, but the resulting graph just created each gate, depot, etc. many times.

I assumed you really wanted 1 depot, and the nested for loops were just a mistake. I changed the logic at the end to use standard networkx drawing, instead of graphviz. This is just a choice, but I thought it made sense to make that simplification; it also takes care of the warning messages about doubles, since nx.draw converts effortless between integer positions and floats (or doubles).

So how to add edges in some automatic way? Well, it seems that all edges are bi-directional, so you could "save" quite some code by first listing the pairs, then creating edges in both directions.

There might be some more that can be done, but I do not have enough information about the underlying rules of the graph. It seems that each node connects to one and only one connecting node, and all connecting nodes connect to their numeric neighbors. If that's the case, then it would be fairly easy to write a routine that does that.