xunit | xUnitnet is a free, open source, community-focused unit testing tool for NET | Unit Testing library
kandi X-RAY | xunit Summary
kandi X-RAY | xunit Summary
xUnit.net is a free, open source, community-focused unit testing tool for the .NET Framework. Written by the original inventor of NUnit v2, xUnit.net is the latest technology for unit testing C#, F#, VB.NET and other .NET languages. xUnit.net works with ReSharper, CodeRush, TestDriven.NET and Xamarin. It is part of the .NET Foundation, and operates under their code of conduct. It is licensed under Apache 2 (an OSI approved license). For project documentation, please visit the xUnit.net project home.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of xunit
xunit Key Features
xunit Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on xunit
QUESTION
I am trying to run my xUnit tests within VSCode using the Run CodeLens .
I am using VSCode 1.65.0 with .Net 6 (6.0.200) on a 2019 MacBook Pro (Intel) with the v1.24.1 of the C# VSCode extension.
I have run it using the dotnet test
command, the .NET Core Test Explore Plugin and VS2022, and these work as expected.
This is the output log I get
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-04 at 19:36To use .net 6 you need to update the Omnisharp setting to use the 'modern' way
the setting you need to toggle is omnisharp.useModernNet
. it is described in the reads of the C# extension.
QUESTION
Before I start, I've tried all suggestions from the following and none work:
Integration testing ASP.NET Core with .NET Framework - can't find deps.json
https://zimmergren.net/unable-to-find-deps-json-dotnet-azure-devops/
So I'm trying to write some integration tests for dotnet 6. However, my WebApplicationFactory
throws the following error:
System.InvalidOperationException: Can't find '/repos/subscription-info-api/tests/SubscriptionInfoApi.Tests.Integration/bin/Debug/net6.0/...
System.InvalidOperationException Can't find '/repos/subscription-info-api/tests/SubscriptionInfoApi.Tests.Integration/bin/Debug/net6.0/testhost.deps.json'. This file is required for functional tests to run properly. There should be a copy of the file on your source project bin folder. If that is not the case, make sure that the property PreserveCompilationContext is set to true on your project file. E.g 'true'. For functional tests to work they need to either run from the build output folder or the testhost.deps.json file from your application's output directory must be copied to the folder where the tests are running on. A common cause for this error is having shadow copying enabled when the tests run. at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing.WebApplicationFactory
1.EnsureDepsFile() at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing.WebApplicationFactory
1.EnsureServer() at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing.WebApplicationFactory1.CreateDefaultClient(DelegatingHandler[] handlers) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing.WebApplicationFactory
1.CreateDefaultClient(Uri baseAddress, DelegatingHandler[] handlers) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing.WebApplicationFactory1.CreateClient(WebApplicationFactoryClientOptions options) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing.WebApplicationFactory
1.CreateClient() at SubscriptionInfoApi.Tests.Integration.UnitTest1.Test1() in /repos/subscription-info-api/tests/SubscriptionInfoApi.Tests.Integration/UnitTest1.cs:line 14 at SubscriptionInfoApi.Tests.Integration.UnitTest1.Test1() in /repos/subscription-info-api/tests/SubscriptionInfoApi.Tests.Integration/UnitTest1.cs:line 16 at Xunit.Sdk.TestInvoker1.<>c__DisplayClass48_0.<b__1>d.MoveNext() in /_/src/xunit.execution/Sdk/Frameworks/Runners/TestInvoker.cs:line 264 --- End of stack trace from previous location --- at Xunit.Sdk.ExecutionTimer.AggregateAsync(Func
1 asyncAction) in //src/xunit.execution/Sdk/Frameworks/ExecutionTimer.cs:line 48 at Xunit.Sdk.ExceptionAggregator.RunAsync(Func`1 code) in //src/xunit.core/Sdk/ExceptionAggregator.cs:line 90
My actual test code is extremely simple:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-18 at 21:03You are probably targeting the wrong namespace for Program in your test file (like I was).
I had to add the following at the end of my Program.cs file (last line) to make it visible to my test projects needing it:
QUESTION
I have an ASP.Net Webforms website running in IIS on a Windows Server. Also on this server is the SQL server.
Everything has been working fine with the site but now I am seeing issues with using a DataAdapter to fill a table.
So here is some code, please note it's just basic outline of code as actual code contains confidential information.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-27 at 15:53Microsoft.Data.SqlClient 4.0 is using ENCRYPT=True by default. Either you put a certificate on the server (not a self signed one) or you put
TrustServerCertificate=Yes;
on the connection string.
QUESTION
Is there a way in C# rx to handle backpressure? I'm trying to call a web api from the results of a paged query. This web api is very fragile and I need to not have more than say 3 concurrent calls, so, the program should be something like:
- Feth a page from db
- Call the web api with a maximum of three concurrent calls per each record on the page
- Save the results back to db
- Fetch another page and repeat until there are no more results.
I'm not really getting the sequence that I'm after, basically the db gets all the records regardless of whether they can be processed or not.
I've tried a variety of things including tweaking at the ObserveOn
operator, implementing a semaphore, and a few other things. Could I get a little bit of guidance to implement something like this?
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-13 at 12:01The Rx does not support backpressure, so there is no easy way to fetch the records from the DB at the same tempo that the records are processed. Maybe you could use a Subject
as a signaling mechanism, push a value every time a record is processed, and devise a way to use these signals at the producing site to fetch a new record from the DB when a signal is received. But it will be a messy and idiomatic solution. The TPL Dataflow is a more suitable tool than the Rx for doing this kind of work. It supports natively the BoundedCapacity
configuration option.
Some comments regarding the code you've posted, that are not directly related to the backpressure issue:
The Merge
operator with a maxConcurrent
parameter imposes a limit on the concurrent subscriptions to the inner sequences, but this will have no effect in case the inner sequences are already up and running. So you have to ensure that the inner sequences are cold, and a handy way to do this is the Defer
operator:
QUESTION
I created an extension method to add all JSON configuration files to the IConfigurationBuilder
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-19 at 09:24The logic of comparing files seems alright, I don't find any outstanding problem with it, it is ok to prepend the "/" to match what you need.
Could be even better if you could use the System.IO.Path.DirectorySeparatorChar
for the directory root path as well, so if you run on windows or Linux you will have no issues.
But there may be a conceptual problem with what you are doing. To my understanding you aim to verify existence of specific configuration files required for your program to work right, if those files are missing than the program should fail. But that kind of failure due to missing configuration files, is an expected and valid result of your code. Yet, you unit-test this as if missing files should fail the test, as if missing files are an indication that something wrong with your code, this is wrong.
Missing files are not indication of your code not working correct and Unit-test should not be used as a validator to make sure the files exist prior executing the program, you will likely agree that unit-test is not part of the actual process and it should only aim to test your code and not preconditions, the test should compare an expected result (mock result of your code) vs. actual result and certainly not meant to become part of the code. That unit test looks like a validator that should be in the code.
So unless those files are produced by your specific code (and not the deployment) there is no sense testing that. In such case you need to create a configuration validator code - and your unit test could test that instead. So it will test that the validator expected result with a mock input you provide. But the thing here is that you would know that you only testing the validation logic and not the actual existence of the files.
QUESTION
I'm trying to include the codecoverage from my Python project.
First I executed the command py.test --cov=tests/ --cov-report xml:cov/coverage.xml
to run the tests and report to cov/coverage.xml
My sonar-project.properties file:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-17 at 10:07As of today, coverage.py doesn't support Sonarqube: https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/1033
Can you try the experiment mentioned on that issue, and report there about what happened? Maybe there's an easy adjustment to make here.
QUESTION
I'm having trouble using XElement to parse multiple elements through an XUnit XML file and return the value.
Here is the XML File
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-20 at 22:35Your code has a couple problems:
The
elements are not direct children of the root element, so
xelement.Elements().Where(e => e.Name.LocalName == "test")
does not select anything. You need to descend deeper into the hierarchy, e.g. withDescendants()
.The message text is contained in an indirect child element of the
node, specifically
failure/message
. You need to select this element to get the message.result.Attribute("message").Value
will not work because theXElement.Attribute(XName)
method selects an XML attribute rather than an element.
Putting those two points together, your code should look like:
QUESTION
I'm wondering if it's possible to have xUnit tests in the same project as the source code is?
I added the xUnit reference, but when I execute the tests, Visual Studio tells me that the project has no tests. I also tried to use Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk
, but in that case an error was shown because the project had two entry points.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-18 at 14:02To get a console App with xUnit Test compiling is a little bit tricky. One way to acheive this is to tweak the console App csproj.
Add the following statement in PropertyGroup section:
QUESTION
I am writing xunit test to test this endpoint.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-11 at 09:00You are sending JSON request (content type application/json
) but server expects form data. You need to use multipart form like this:
QUESTION
I'm using xUnit and FluentAssertions to write an integration test to validate that our models are correctly mapped. We have dozens of EF contexts and for each context, there are one or more DbSet<>
properties like this:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-09 at 15:29Exception is thrown because GetGenericTypeDefinition()
does not work on non-generic types, so you should first check if type is actually generic before invoking it:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install xunit
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page