0.30000000000000004 | Floating Point Math Examples | Math library
kandi X-RAY | 0.30000000000000004 Summary
kandi X-RAY | 0.30000000000000004 Summary
Floating Point Math Examples
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of 0.30000000000000004
0.30000000000000004 Key Features
0.30000000000000004 Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on 0.30000000000000004
QUESTION
I have a problem reading the first column of the csv file with numpy. All the values of the first column gets returned as nan
instead of [ 2. 4. 1120.]
and such.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-10 at 02:10First, your import sentence is inverted. It should be:
QUESTION
In run the follow code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-03 at 06:40Just use round
method with a precision of 1
:
QUESTION
I'm experimenting with the precision of a double value in various programming languages.
My programs main.c ...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-15 at 19:43The differences you're seeing are in how you print out the data, not in the data itself.
As I see it, we have two problems here. One is that you're not consistently specifying the same precision when you print out the data in each language.
The second is that you're printing the data out to 17 digits of precision, but at least as normally implemented (double
being a 64-bit number with a 53-bit significand) a double
really only has about 15 decimal digits of precision.
So, while (for example) C and C++ both require that your result be rounded "correctly", once you go beyond the limits of precision it's supposed to support, they can't guarantee much about producing truly identical results in every possible case.
But that's going to affect only how the result looks when you print it out, not how it's actually stored internally.
QUESTION
I am trying to plot the content of the arrays x
and lj
in the following code. However, the point in the plots are not the one inside the arrays. Can someone help me see the mistake I did ? I am still new in python.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-19 at 14:46Almost division by zero The plot is correct, lj[0] is almost equal to infinity, remove the first element, to get a better curve
QUESTION
In our C++ codebase, we have a default formatting method to convert double
floating point numbers into strings, that is used notably for JSON serialization and for debug logs. For that default number formatting, I have the following contradictory requirements:
- Favor human readability. Prefer
1000
to1e3
or0.125
to1.25e-1
. - Keep the precision. Prefer
3.1415926535897931
to3.14
. - Avoid spurious digits for decimal numbers. Prefer
0.1
to0.10000000000000001
.
Up to now, the best tradeoff I found is to use the equivalent of printf("%.15g", value)
formatting. It fulfills requirements 1 and 3, but not completely 2. There is a loss of precision of about 4 bits.
Other people use a default formatting based on "%.17g"
, which fulfills requirements 1 and 2, but not 3. The number 0.2 is for example formatted as 0.20000000000000001
.
In between, the format "%.16g"
is close to fulfill requirements 2 and 3, but not always for both.
As an illustration, I wish 0.3 to be formatted as 0.3
, but 0.1+0.2, which is slightly bigger due to rounding errors, to be formatted as 0.30000000000000004
to see the difference.
I wrote the following function that format floating point numbers the way I wish, as a proof of concept. However it is unacceptable on the performance point of view, since it can make up to 34 conversions between double
and strings, for a limited precision gain over the current implementation with "%.15g"
.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-20 at 18:26After Frodyne comment, I was able to figure out a very simple and fast solution.
The C++17 std::to_chars
function, by default, formats the floating point numbers to fulfill shortest round trip requirement. That mean that all distinct floating point numbers remain distinct after serialization, and the number of characters to format is minimized.
So the conversion can be written like this in standard C++17.
QUESTION
Hello so i have this function that returns two lists, (list_y and list_t), i wanna use these lists separately, because i want to draw a graph using them (list_y represent the y label and list_t represents the x labels )
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-27 at 18:08Or in function:
QUESTION
The following reveals a difference in the way numbers are generated by division vs multiplication:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-29 at 00:41The critical point here is that 10
is represented exactly in binary, whereas 0.1
is not. Dividing by 10 gets you the closest possible representation for each fraction; multiplying by the inexact conversion of 0.1 does not guarantee precision. Sometimes you get "close enough" to round off the result to a single decimal place, sometimes not.
Is that enough rationale?
QUESTION
The following code seems incredibly simple. an integer is passed to the function in Python, which creates a PyList in C then populates it:
hello.c:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-08 at 21:14I'm quite surprised there's no warnings here when building, the types of functions shouldn't be their primitive types but of PyObject*
-- you'll then parse the types and execute your function
Here's an adjustment to your function:
QUESTION
So let's start with normal values in the regular R setup:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-08 at 05:35all.equal
might be useful here:
QUESTION
I'm having trouble figuring ou ta solution to my ploblem, so here it is:
I have this column "Cs/min - bruto" in my dataframe (df_refData):
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-04 at 03:57Try this:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install 0.30000000000000004
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page