buildx | Docker CLI plugin for extended build capabilities | Continuous Deployment library

 by   docker Go Version: v0.10.5 License: Apache-2.0

kandi X-RAY | buildx Summary

kandi X-RAY | buildx Summary

buildx is a Go library typically used in Devops, Continuous Deployment, Nodejs, Docker applications. buildx has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has medium support. You can download it from GitHub.

buildx is a Docker CLI plugin for extended build capabilities with BuildKit.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              buildx has a medium active ecosystem.
              It has 2641 star(s) with 378 fork(s). There are 54 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 12 months.
              There are 297 open issues and 646 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 106 days. There are 28 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of buildx is v0.10.5

            kandi-Quality Quality

              buildx has no bugs reported.

            kandi-Security Security

              buildx has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

            kandi-License License

              buildx is licensed under the Apache-2.0 License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              buildx releases are available to install and integrate.
              Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of buildx
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            buildx Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for buildx.

            buildx Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for buildx.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            can you combine separate builds from docker?
            Asked 2021-Jun-13 at 19:47

            I am using circleci to deploy an application, I deploy to both amd and arm architectures so my builds are multi-arch which I have been using docker buildx for. With the new arm support from circleci I was able to cut the time on this process down from sometimes 3 hours using quemu, to around 20 minutes by building both separately in their respective build environments (no need to use quemu when you build on the target arch). What I am running into is that when I run the buildx commands, one build will complete, push it's results to the repository and then the other completes and overwrites the previous. What I am trying to achieve is combining the built images into a single manifest to push together as if I built them at the same time. Is there a way to achieve what I am attempting without getting into direct modification of the manifest files? An example of the commands needed to achieve this would be extremely helpful!

            Thanks in advance!

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-13 at 19:47

            There are two options I know of.

            First, you can have buildx run builds on multiple nodes, one for each platform, rather than using qemu. For that, you would use docker buildx create --append to add the additional nodes to the builder instance. The downside of this is you'll need the nodes accessible from the node running docker buildx which likely doesn't apply to ephemeral cloud build environments.

            The second option is to use the experimental docker manifest command. Each builder would push a separate tag. And at the end of all those, you would use docker manifest create to build a manifest list and docker manifest push to push that to a registry. Since this is an experimental feature, you'll want to export DOCKER_CLI_EXPERIMENTAL=enabled to see it in the command line. (You can also modify ~/.docker/config.json to have an "experimental": "enabled" entry.)

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67961885

            QUESTION

            Connecting Docker/buildx to preexisting builder in Kubernetes cluster
            Asked 2021-Jun-01 at 19:13

            So I know how to create a new builder for buildx in a Kubernetes cluster before starting a build with buildx e.g. from outside:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-01 at 19:13

            You can run docker buildx ls to list the builders and docker buildx use to set the the current instance (or the default one with the --default flag). The config files for builders are located in ~/.docker/buildx/instances, I believe, at least in Docker version 20.10.5.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67794641

            QUESTION

            Docker on CentOS 7 - DNS not workin within containers
            Asked 2021-May-23 at 21:21

            I installed Docker on a CentOS 7 machine and DNS is not working within containers.

            So, if I run nslookup google.com on my host, it resolves correctly. However, if I do docker container run busybox nslookup google.com I get:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-May-23 at 21:09

            As you can see in your error :

            Can't find google.com

            Container does't have access to network and therefore it can't find google !

            And I can't see your Dockerfile and docker-compose.yml (If you use it) in the question above !

            BUT

            First step it's better to create a network using docker network create --help

            --help ------> For seeing which options you want to use for your container networking :) (according to docs.docker)

            Second step it's to EXPOSE: the port on docker file (docs.docker & Article about concept of EXPOSE)

            AND LAST : Try to check your container networking another way and simply use docker run

            Try to use bash in your main image That is Cent OS for checking the network of container

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67664001

            QUESTION

            Building a multi-architecture Docker image, but Dockerfile requires different packages depending on architecture
            Asked 2021-May-19 at 10:44

            I am experimenting with docker's buildx and noticed that everything seems to be straight forward except for one thing. My Dockerfile needs to pull certain packages depending on the architecture.

            For example, here's a piece of the Dockerfile:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-May-19 at 10:44

            Docker automatically defines a set of ARGs for you when you're using the BuildKit backend (which is now the default). You need to declare that ARG, and then (within the RUN command) you can use an environment variable $TARGETOS to refer to the target operating system (the documentation suggests linux or windows).

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67596193

            QUESTION

            No such image: my-image:latest while pushing container with Github Actions
            Asked 2021-May-18 at 16:47

            I am modifying my docker-publish file to build a docker image so it can work with Arm64. The previous version was working fine with x86 architecture, but now I need to make it work for Arm 64 so I just changed the way the docker builds the images.

            The build process works fine but somehow the git push stopped working and I am getting the error

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-May-17 at 17:39

            Buildx runs builds within a separate container, not directly in your docker engine. And the output of buildx does not store the resulting image in the local docker engine. This doesn't work when you get into multi-platform images anyway, so you typically push directly to the registry. It's much more efficient to avoid moving layers around that didn't change in the registry, and allows you to manage multi-platform images (everything loaded into the docker engine is dereferenced to a single platform).

            If you really want to save the output to the local docker engine, you can use --load in the buildx command. However, the preferred option is to use the build-push-action that builds your tag directly and pushes it in one step. This would mean reordering your steps to determine the versions and other variables first, and then run the build against that. You can see an example of this in my own project which was assembled from various other docker examples out there.

            Here's a quick untested attempt to make that change:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67547801

            QUESTION

            Share same steps for different GitHub Actions jobs
            Asked 2021-May-04 at 19:41

            I have a cross-platform project which is to be built on 2 platforms: mac and linux(ubuntu).

            My pipeline contains 3 jobs:

            1. prepare docker image with all nessesary too to build the project.
            2. build on ubuntu in prepared docker container, depends on step 1
            3. build on MacOS, needs nothing

            Steps for linux and macos are definitely the same. But matrixes differs much, and linux build is run inside container.

            Is there a way to share steps between two different jobs?

            I tried YAML anchors but GitHub does not support them.

            Full workflow

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-May-04 at 19:41
            TL;DR

            I solved my problem with shell tool yq

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67368724

            QUESTION

            Docker: Using buildx to support multiple architecture, do I need it on the parent image?
            Asked 2021-Apr-14 at 15:09

            I'm trying here, after having posted the following on the Docker Forum.

            I’ve tried the buildx command explained in the documentation (from my Intel-based Mac):

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Apr-13 at 15:07
            standard_init_linux.go:211: exec user process caused “exec format error”
            

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66553909

            QUESTION

            How to set a Dockerfile ARG in Github actions
            Asked 2021-Apr-12 at 00:41

            I have a Dockerfile for one of my Node.js services that I try to push to my Digitalocean registry through the use of Github actions.

            My Node.js service requires a private package that is hosted by myself on npm.js registry.

            In my Dockerfile, I have an ARG for that:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Apr-12 at 00:41

            Actually, I figured it out. Have to add build-args to the Build and Push part, and remove the env from there.

            So instead of:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67051284

            QUESTION

            Get https://ghrc.io/v2/: net/http: request canceled while waiting for connection (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)
            Asked 2021-Apr-07 at 11:45

            I am using github actions to build and push my images to github registry.

            This is my deploy file,

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Apr-07 at 11:45

            The domain is ghcr.io (short for GitHub Container Registry), not ghrc.io. This is a typo and you're trying to push your container image to an unknown host on the internet.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66985250

            QUESTION

            br_netfilter error when deploying docker containers to swarm on ubuntu 20.04
            Asked 2021-Apr-01 at 12:25

            I've been struggling to deploy my containers to Docker swarm on Ubuntu server 20.04. I'm trying to use Docker swarm on a single VPS host for zero-downtime deployments.

            Running containers with docker-compose everything works.

            Now trying to deploy the same docker-compose file to docker swarm.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Apr-01 at 12:25

            That problem was in the hosting provider.

            Provider told us that other customers have tried to configure Docker Swarm on their VPS too, but no one has figured out how to get it to work.

            The provider didn't allow any kernel modification or anything else on the lower level.

            Now we are using another hosting provider and everything works fine.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66814699

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install buildx

            Important This section is for unattended installation of the buildx component. These instructions are mostly suitable for testing purposes. We do not recommend installing buildx using manual download in production environments as they will not be updated automatically with security updates. On Windows and macOS, we recommend that you install Docker Desktop instead. For Linux, we recommend that you follow the instructions specific for your distribution. You can also download the latest binary from the GitHub releases page.
            /usr/local/lib/docker/cli-plugins OR /usr/local/libexec/docker/cli-plugins
            /usr/lib/docker/cli-plugins OR /usr/libexec/docker/cli-plugins
            C:\ProgramData\Docker\cli-plugins
            C:\Program Files\Docker\cli-plugins
            Buildx also aims to provide support for high-level build concepts that go beyond invoking a single build command. We want to support building all the images in your application together and let the users define project specific reusable build flows that can then be easily invoked by anyone. BuildKit efficiently handles multiple concurrent build requests and de-duplicating work. The build commands can be combined with general-purpose command runners (for example, make). However, these tools generally invoke builds in sequence and therefore cannot leverage the full potential of BuildKit parallelization, or combine BuildKit’s output for the user. For this use case, we have added a command called docker buildx bake. The bake command supports building images from compose files, similar to docker-compose build, but allowing all the services to be built concurrently as part of a single request. There is also support for custom build rules from HCL/JSON files allowing better code reuse and different target groups. The design of bake is in very early stages and we are looking for feedback from users.

            Support

            Want to contribute to Buildx? Awesome! You can find information about contributing to this project in the CONTRIBUTING.md.
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/docker/buildx.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone docker/buildx

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:docker/buildx.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link