cheat | command line , because , you know , life | Learning library

This was a good opportunity to check out the new geomtextpath, which looks really cool. It's got a bunch of geoms to place text along different types of paths, so you can project your labels onto the lines.

However, I couldn't figure out a good way to set the hjust parameter the way you wanted: the text is aligned based on the range of the plot rather than the path the text sits along. In this case, the default hjust = 0.5 means the labels are at x = 0.5 (because the x-range is 0 to 1; different range would have a different position). You can make some adjustments but I pretty quickly had labels leaving the range of the plot. If being in or around the middle is okay, then this is an option that looks pretty nice.

It's just an attribute on the element. It doesn't have any meaning by itself, so it may be present simply as a red herring.

Prettified, the code is:

At face value the regex you've posted is "OK" and should work (although you should consider backslash-escaping the last hyphen in the character class, or moving this to the last character in the character class, in order to avoid any future ambiguity with it being interpreted as a range indicator). The + can be used unescaped in the character class as it carries no special meaning here.

For example (copy/paste the following):

You have to first split the wordsIncorrect string the same way you did it with the wordsReviewed so it does compare whith the item and not include strings which have something at the end like matching "cat" with "cattle"

This is the fixed example

you can use box-decoration-break: clone; to change how lines get styled and for the radius you can use box-shadow to hide the lines that get extra border-radius that you don't want. In the end, your code will end up like this:

You need to improve your request with initContainerStatuses to find necessary information only for Init containers:

As pointed out by @kmdreko, your code fails to compile because, while ! can be coerced to any T, fn() -> ! cannot be coerced to fn() -> T.

To work around the above, you can declare fail() to return Value, and actually return the "value" of std::process::exit(1). Omitting the semicolon coerces the ! to Value, and you don't have to cheat with a Value::Null:

Assuming the method returns something that is defined, you could do (if I'm understanding the question correctly):

You can take a look at built-in loggers source code and see how they implement it.

In short, they only check that logLevel != LogLevel.None, but depending on the logger logic, you might also want to check some other configuration. For example, DebugLogger logger also checks the Debugger.IsAttached property and EventLogLogger checks the EventLogSettings.Filter (supplied via constructor).

Update

To make this effective, my IsEnabled() method should be able to know what the log level IS for the instance of the logger that was created with my LoggerProvider, but I don't know how to get that information directly, or how to pass it properly to the injected instance of the the logger I am working with.

You can create an implementation of ILoggerProvider which in turn can make use of dependency injection to get the configuration you want. If you want to use the options pattern to configure it, you must do something along the lines of: