leeway | Leeway is a heavily caching build system for Go, Typescript and Docker projects | Continuous Deployment library

To get Edge to trust the localhost development server, I created a selfsigned certificate following this tutorial. I just replaced all instances of client-1.local by localhost.

So in short, I created a trusted authority by creating a .pem-file with the commands

In my Laravel project, I use jwt for user authentication.I successfully login and receive the token. I send the token with the Barear prefix in the header but I get a 401 error.Meanwhile, my project works well on localhost, but it has this problem on cpanel hosts.My codes are below

I'm trying to implement a navigation bar with the logout option.

Here's the code for my functional component:

right now I have an api view that requires knowing which user is currently logged in. When I try to call it with a logged in user; however, it returns anonymous user. The odd thing is that if I call the api view again, it returns the proper user. I am using django rest framework and JSON Web Tokens with simplejwt. Right now the call in ReactJS looks like this:

I am investigating jwt token examples from this link - https://github.com/firebase/php-jwt

So i run:

I'm implementing a google sign-in feature which uses PHP sessions across pages to determine whether the user is in fact signed in. This works perfectly on my local machine. When I upload to my hosted server (happens to be Google Cloud) and adjust the client ids accordingly and then sign in as normal, the sign-in process completes, but the user is reported as being not signed in. A few page refreshes and / or clicks on the "sign in" button then result in the user being recognised as being signed in. I am assuming that the session variables are not being set correctly or that there is some delay in setting them. However, maybe there is another issue that I'm unaware of (again there are no problems when I run the service locally). I appreciate that this is a bit of a vague question. I have tried using session_write_close() in case the sessions were being kept open for too long, though this made no discernible difference.

Once the user is successfully authenticated by google sign-in, a POST page, oauth.php reads the variables and writes them to the $_SESSION variables, for example:

In the answer to

• Is it valid to create closure (lambda) objects using `std::bit_cast` in C++20?

it was shown that a program could have undefined behavior "depending on" (des Pudels Kern in this question) how an implementation used implementation leeway given by the standard. As an example, [expr.prim.lambda.closure]/2:

The closure type is declared in the smallest block scope, class scope, or namespace scope that contains the corresponding lambda-expression. [...] The closure type is not an aggregate type. An implementation may define the closure type differently from what is described below provided this does not alter the observable behavior of the program other than by changing:

• (2.1) the size and/or alignment of the closure type,
• (2.2) whether the closure type is trivially copyable ([class.prop]), or
• (2.3) whether the closure type is a standard-layout class ([class.prop]). [...]

It was pointed out in a comment to the answer that this scenario is not implementation-defined behavior

"implementation-defined" has a very specific meaning ([intro.abstract]/2); this isn't a case of that.

Would a program which had undefined behavior (UB) conditionally on such implementation leeway, have unconditional UB, possibly as per [intro.abstract]/5? Or how would such a program be described, in standardese terms?

I wonder if the following should or should not compile in C++17

Because TextContent has horrible performances on my app in IE and I need to align a div to the right inside another larger div without knowing the width of the text, I am forced to make the div containing the label the same size as the container. How can I make the pointer events apply to the part of the label that contains the text, but not the whole width of the label.

Here's a simple fiddle explaining my problem: