lexnum | efficient lexicographic encoding of numbers | Math library
kandi X-RAY | lexnum Summary
kandi X-RAY | lexnum Summary
lexnum provides a lexicographic encoding of numbers. It is based off of the ideas presented in Peter Seymour's Efficient Lexicographic Encoding of Numbers. The paper's original source can be found at but it is re-hosted here for posterity. Numbers are ordered. That's part of their whole thing, what with them being numbers and all. 1 comes before 2, and 2 comes before 3, and so on, and so forth. If you sort a list of integers like [1, 9, 4, 10, 13, 31] you'll get them back in their normal ordering: [1, 4, 9, 10, 13, 31]. If each of those were to be strings, such that the input is ['1', '9', '4', '10', '13', '31'], sorting them lexically would not produce a proper numerical sorting, you would wind up with ['1', '10', '13', '31', '4', '9']. That is quite annoying when doing things like appending numbers to identical file names or basically anything where you wish to put a number in the middle of what is otherwise a string. You could always just pad your numbers with zeroes, so the prior example would have an input more like ['01', '09', '04', '10', '13', '31']. This works fine, but it requires that you know something about your input in advance. Namely, it requires that you know the range of the input, which may not always be the case. More subtly, it also requires that you know that you're only dealing with positive integers; even with zero padding, negative numbers would lexically sort backwards (e.g., '+1' lexically precedes '+2', which makes sense because 1 is less than 2, but it's also the case that '-1' precedes '-2', which makes no sense, since -2 is less than -1). Doubly subtle is the fact that the only reason a negative number string precedes a positive number string is that the negative character precedes the zero character in the ascii table. Triply subtle is that if you just always put a sign in front of your numbers, the positive numbers will precede the negative numbers because the + character precedes the - character in ascii. The end result is that a list like ['+1', '+4', '-9', '+10', '-13', '+31'] would lexically sort to ['+1', '+10', '+31', '+4', '-13', '-9']. For a full description of how the problem is solved, read the white paper.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- DecodeInt decodes an int .
- NewEncoder returns a new encoder .
lexnum Key Features
lexnum Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on lexnum
QUESTION
I'm trying out the happy parser generator of Haskell. After generating the module in happy.hs (no problem while generating!), I run the command ghc happy.hs
, and I get the error: Line 297: parse error on input 'data'
. Does anyone have solutions? Or tell me where can I get the solution?
I tried loading the module in GHCi, rather than compiling it using ghc. But it seems not to be working too - I get the same error.
Code in happy.y (happy source):
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jul-29 at 14:37Happy produces its generated code on column 1 of the file. Therefore, to have your code be considered part of the same module
-where
block as the generated code (which you cannot control), it must also live on column 1 of the file.
Delete four spaces from the beginning of the plain-Haskell lines of code in your happy file and you'll be on your way to the next error. Make sure that your deriving
clauses and where
clauses are indented one level from their surroundings when you are deleting spaces.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install lexnum
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page