cds | Grade Continuous Delivery & DevOps Automation Open Source | Continuous Deployment library

I'm not sure what "when I break the lines" means here. It doesn't appear that there is a SQL injection attack here. It looks like the JSON passed in the request has an enrollStatus of "2000 and select sleep(10)))); --" rather than, presumably, "2000". The query that is reported in the error message is using bind variables so this is just Oracle saying "hey, I'm comparing this thing you're passing in against a numeric value but I can't seem to convert it to a number". The actual value you're passing in doesn't appear in the query so it's not a SQL injection attack.

Now, from a security standpoint, the error message is leaking a whole lot of information about the underlying schema which I'd be uncomfortable handing an attacker. It is possible that knowing that information would help an attacker to craft a SQL injection attack somewhere else in the system or to access data they're not authorized to access.

An HWND is not a pointer. You most likely want:

I'm not 100% sure what you are trying to do, so I propose a solution for the problem I believe you want to solve.

First we separate the ranges in gff:

Elya, you can simplify what you want to do. Most importantly, you do not need to loop over your data.
I assume your example data is representative for your dataset. In particular, the information in other is separated by a semi-colon. In this case you can split the string by it and extract from your 3rd column the part required to add to the "gene_id" fragment in your 2nd column. Based on your comment I append a solution for multiple hits in the other column.

Note: the following names these columns "info", "gene_id", and "other". Make sure to adapt the variable naming.

data

My guess is that your legacy app used a gem called Squeel which monkeypatched core methods in ActiveRecord like where, joins etc to take a block argument:

You are correct in saying that Incremental is designed to perform Deltas on current resource snapshots within the Envoy management server.

LDS and CDS obviously receive benefits from incremental, but the protocol is a bit more nuanced than you think. The other resource xDS servers DO show performance benefits as the subscription model is quite a bit different than SOTW. Some functionality did carry over into incremental xDS, but quite a bit changed internally. We are looking to add performance benchmarks inside of go-control-plane once this PR goes in: https://github.com/envoyproxy/go-control-plane/pull/387.

SOTW xDS will still send all resources that envoy requests regardless. Incremental operates on a diffing mechanism that will only send changes to clients that the server believes are needed. I would recommend reading through the merged control plane code for incremental to see how it works under the hood. If you have any more questions feel free to reach out to me in the envoy slack!

I would be happy to come back and report real metrics in a test environment once that code merges upstream :)

Your code is somewhat inefficient in the sense that it repeatedly splits the all the lines up. In the code below, this is only done once when they are first read in from the file. In addition, after reading they're transposed into columns of row since most of the processing is done with respect to what in each column.

features is just one string in one line of the file, not all the strings in that column.

Add each word to the unique_list set in the loop, and print the set at the end.

i had resolved the issues in the code earlier , sharing the same for others who might need help , the primary problem was wlthint3client.jar was needed. The final code git is below.

MyJMSKafkaConnect

The code is kafkaconnect api which reads from Weblogic Uniform distributed Queue and writes to kafka queue.