comply | Compliance automation framework , focused on SOC2 | Continous Integration library

I have object with hardcoded array values. This object is as const because in other part of code I need TS to by aware of all possible values.

Problem is that I cannot use .every() method on given array from that object. TS is complying about This expression is not callable. even that code works just fine.

I noticed three things while trying to debug this:

1. Opposite method some has no problems.
2. If I remove as const from object, there is no errors with every but like I said I cannot remove this because TS needs to be aware of all values, not treat them as any number
3. If I use hardcoded key instead variable on that object, it works (but I need to use this as a function).

Why this does not work? What I'm doing wrong?

We have some apps (or maybe we should call them a handful of scripts) that use Google APIs to facilitate some administrative tasks. Recently, after making another client_id in the same project, I started getting an error message similar to the one described in localhost redirect_uri does not work for Google Oauth2 (results in 400: invalid_request error). I.e.,

Error 400: invalid_request

You can't sign in to this app because it doesn't comply with Google's OAuth 2.0 policy for keeping apps secure.

You can let the app developer know that this app doesn't comply with one or more Google validation rules.

Request details:

The content in this section has been provided by the app developer. This content has not been reviewed or verified by Google.

If you’re the app developer, make sure that these request details comply with Google policies.

redirect_uri: urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob

How do I get through this error? It is important to note that:

• The OAuth consent screen for this project is marked as "Internal". Therefore any mentions of Google review of the project, or publishing status are irrelevant
• I do have "Trust internal, domain-owned apps" enabled for the domain
• Another client id in the same project works and there are no obvious differences between the client IDs - they are both "Desktop" type which only gives me a Client ID and Client secret that are different
• This is a command line script, so I use the "copy/paste" verification method as documented here hence the urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob redirect URI (copy/paste is the only friendly way to run this on a headless machine which has no browser).
• I was able to reproduce the same problem in a dev domain. I have three client ids. The oldest one is from January 2021, another one from December 2021, and one I created today - March 2022. Of those, only the December 2021 works and lets me choose which account to authenticate with before it either accepts it or rejects it with "Error 403: org_internal" (this is expected). The other two give me an "Error 400: invalid_request" and do not even let me choose the "internal" account. Here are the URLs generated by my app (I use the ruby google client APIs) and the only difference between them is the client_id - January 2021, December 2021, March 2022.

Here is the part of the code around the authorization flow, and the URLs for the different client IDs are what was produced on the $stderr.puts url line. It is pretty much the same thing as documented in the official example here (version as of this writing).

For example, if I want to find

1085912312763120759250776993188102125849391224162 = a^9+b^9+c^9+d the code needs to brings

a=3456

b=78525

c=217423

d=215478

I do not need specific values, only that they comply with the fact that a, b and c have 6 digits at most and d is as small as possible.

Is there a quick way to find it?

I appreciate any help you can give me.

I have tried with nested loops but it is extremely slow and the code gets stuck.

Any help in VB or other code would be appreciated. I think the structure is more important than the language in this case

Thanks in advance, and sorry if something is unclear, it's my first time posting here. I am working on something that should be fairly simple, but I cannot seem to find a way of making it work.

The task that I want to complete is the following: I have a dataset with hundreds of variables. I need to recode all of them following the same logic. The logic is the following: if the GIVEN VARIABLE == 0 & a SPECIFIC VARIABLE == 1, the GIVEN VARIABLE must = -1. The SPECIFIC VARIABLE is the same for all of them.

What I have done is the following:

Nothing to install, update or remove Generating optimized autoload files Class App\Helpers\Helper located in C:/wamp64/www/vuexylaravel/app\Helpers\helpers.php does not comply with psr-4 autoloading standard. Skipping. > Illuminate\Foundation\ComposerScripts::postAutoloadDump > @php artisan package:discover --ansi

I am working on a (Open)Modelica library for simulating chemical processes. With commercial tools it is a common approach that the mixture configuration (e.g. how many and which chemical components are involved like water, ethanol, ...) is defined once for the feed-stream and then this information is propagated via the streams to all the subsequent unit operations.

Unfortunately, so far I did not manage to use the powerful modelica language to achieve this functionality. The ideal situation would be to model a "Process" like this:

I am developing a NextJS application using next-auth with Google Oauth 2 as its authentication provider. The production build is running on Heroku. When attempting to sign in on my production build, Google OAuth is giving me "Error 400: redirect_uri_mismatch". Normally this would be an easy fix, except the exact uri is already registered in Cloud Console.

.

I have also tried added many different permutations of my uri, but this did not help.

This issue not solved by 11485271 or 69151061.

Error in question:

Error 400: redirect_uri_mismatch

You can't sign in to this app because it doesn't comply with Google's OAuth 2.0 policy.

If you're the app developer, register the redirect URI in the Google Cloud Console.

Request Details If you’re the app developer, make sure that these request details comply with Google policies. redirect_uri: https://middcourses2.herokuapp.com/api/auth/callback/google

And here is a link to the list of authorized domains in GCP.

I am in a project and I have to comply with ISO26262 so I need to verify my CAN frame. I am going to check my frame using the CRC calculation. My question is: Should I do this calculation in my program or does the CAN protocol already do it automatically?

I made a vba script that should change a specific area's values from comma-separated to dot-separated.

Here is the code: