mmm | mmm - manual memory management library | Continuous Deployment library

This worked for me (just copy each column based off the array of column indexes):

In Log4j2 basically two aspects change in the XML configuration:

• component types are not identified using their class name, but their plugin name. E.g. to create a RollingFileAppender (cf. javadoc) you'll use RollingFile instead of org.apache.logging.log4j.core.appender.RollingFileAppender,
• all simple properties of a component are specified as XML attributes.

The concise version of your appender (cf. [concise and string XML config])(https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/configuration.html#Configuration_with_XML) will be:

This issue is caused by the gaps in the dataset. For some reason, this is confusing ChartJS. If you put in zero values for the missing values in "NON RISCOSSO" and remove the if that prevents these from being added to datasets if (pagamento.totpag !== 0) it works.

Let me know if that is an acceptable workaround. Otherwise could possibly dig a bit further into ChartJS to figure out what's going on.

Below is some code that adds zero values into the datasets so there are no gaps. I've had to rewrite your data normalization code.

CTEs can break this down a little easier. In the code below, the payment_streak CTE is the key bit; the start_of_streak field is first marking rows that count as the start of a streak, and then taking the maximum over all previous rows (to find the start of this streak).

The last SELECT is only comparing these two dates, computing how many months are between them (excluding June/July), and then finding the best streak per customer.

This is because you're specifying the pattern YYYY for the year.

According to the docs for java.time.format.DateTimeFormatter, a pattern of one or more Ys means ‘week-based year’.

That's different from the usual ‘year-of-era’, which you get from a pattern of one or more lower-case ys.

The difference is explained in this question. Basically, if the year starts in the middle of a week, it treats that entire week as falling either in the previous year or the following year.

The exact calculation will depend indirectly upon the locale, as that controls which day the week starts on. (I don't fully understand all the details, but I think it's mediated by the WeekFields class. However it works, it can cause the last few days of 2021 to be treated as part of 2022, as this question demonstrates.)

In any case, it looks like your real problem is using a week-based year number when you just want the normal calendar year! So, simply change your pattern to "EEE dd MMM yyyy, h:mm:ss", and you should get the expected result:

You have to take care of several things when parsing a String like "DEC/12/1999":

• abbreviations of months do not have a global standard, they differ in language (e.g. English, French, Japanese...) and style (e.g. trailing dot or not)
• there's a difference in parsing lower-case month abbreviations and those in upper-case

That's why you have to make sure your DateTimeFormatter really knows what to do, I think it won't do if simply build by .ofPattern(String, Locale).

Give it information about the String to be parsed:

• make it parse case-insensitively by applying parseCaseInsensitive()
• make it consider language and style by defining a Locale

You can use a DateTimeFormatterBuilder in order to do that, here's an example:

Try wrapping the text you want to not overflow in a Flexible() widget. That will make sure it doesn't take up more space in the row than is available.

You can use regular expression with two capturing groups. The first one will match the color and the second one will get the message. Then you can replace whole matched text with
... .
So after def body = comment.body use this code:

My guess is that the error is related to an important change that was introduced in Java 9 regarding the use of CLDR locale data by default:

In JDK 9, the default locale data uses data derived from the Unicode Consortium's Common Locale Data Repository (CLDR). As a result, users may see differences in locale sensitive services behavior and/or translations. For example, CLDR does not provide localized display names for most 3- letter time zone IDs, thus the display names may be different from JDK 8 and older. The JDK continues to ship with the legacy JRE locale data and the system property java.locale.providers can be used to configure the lookup order. To enable behavior compatible with JDK 8, the system property can be set with:

-Djava.locale.providers=COMPAT,SPI

For more detail, refer to the JEP 252.

I was able to reproduce the issue with an installed JDK 9.0.4 version and in the online editor you showed in your screenshot and JDK 10.0.1.

The problem seems related to the time zone z placeholder, only to certain time zones - it works fine with UTC or CET, for instance, but not for WAT - and only to certain locales. Using SimpleDateFormat or DateTimeFormatter makes no difference.

Consider the following test case: