store | A dead simple configuration manager for Go applications | Configuration Management library

by tucnak Go Version: v1.0 License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets(3)Community Discussions(10)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | store Summary

store is a Go library typically used in Devops, Configuration Management applications. store has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Store is a dead simple configuration manager for Go applications. I didn't like existing configuration management solutions like globalconf, tachyon or viper. First two just don't feel right and viper, imo, a little overcomplicated—definitely offering too much for small things. Store supports either JSON, TOML or YAML out-of-the-box and lets you register practically any other configuration format. It persists all of your configurations in either $XDG_CONFIG_HOME or $HOME on Linux and in %APPDATA% on Windows.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

store has a low active ecosystem.

It has 253 star(s) with 16 fork(s). There are 5 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

There are 2 open issues and 1 have been closed. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of store is v1.0

Quality

store has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

store has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

store code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

store is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

store releases are available to install and integrate.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

It has 185 lines of code, 12 functions and 2 files.

It has medium code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of store

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

store Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for store.

store Examples and Code Snippets

Gathers a list of operations that can be used to store the current saved state .

python

Lines of Code : 67

License : Non-SPDX (Apache License 2.0)

Copy

def gather_ops_or_named_saveables(self):
    """Looks up or creates SaveableObjects which don't have cached ops.

    Returns:
      A tuple of (
          existing_restore_ops: list,
          named_saveables: dict,
          python_positions: list,

Create and store a new value .

python

Lines of Code : 43

License : Non-SPDX (Apache License 2.0)

Copy

def put(self, key, vals, indices=None, name=None):
    """Create an op that stores the (key, vals) pair in the staging area.

    Incomplete puts are possible, preferably using a dictionary for vals
    as the appropriate dtypes and shapes can be inf

Temporarily set the default variable store .

python

Lines of Code : 25

License : Non-SPDX (Apache License 2.0)

Copy

def as_default(self):
    try:
      if not self._used_once:
        # If an outer eager VariableStore was explicitly created and set by
        # the first time this template store was used (even if not at
        # constructor time) then pick up th

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on store

The unauthenticated git protocol on port 9418 is no longer supported

TypeError: load() missing 1 required positional argument: 'Loader' in Google Colab

npx create-react-app prompting to globally uninstall non-existent create-react-app package?

Terraform AWS Provider Error: Value for unconfigurable attribute. Can't configure a value for "acl": its value will be decided automatically

Google app engine deployment fails- Error while finding module specification for 'pip' (AttributeError: module '__main__' has no attribute '__file__')

Why does the thread sanitizer complain about acquire/release thread fences?

What is the significance of 'strongly happens before' compared to '(simply) happens before'?

How do I fix a Firebase 9.0 import error? "Attempted import error: 'firebase/app' does not contain a default export (imported as 'firebase')."

App Store Connect Upload Error "You haven't been given access to cloud-managed distribution certificates"

Xcode 13.2 - Adding package hangs on "Preparing to validate"

QUESTION

The unauthenticated git protocol on port 9418 is no longer supported

Asked 2022-Mar-27 at 13:23

I have been using github actions for quite sometime but today my deployments started failing. Below is the error from github action logs

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Mar-16 at 07:01

First, this error message is indeed expected on Jan. 11th, 2022.
See "Improving Git protocol security on GitHub".

January 11, 2022 Final brownout.

This is the full brownout period where we’ll temporarily stop accepting the deprecated key and signature types, ciphers, and MACs, and the unencrypted Git protocol.
This will help clients discover any lingering use of older keys or old URLs.

Second, check your package.json dependencies for any git:// URL, as in this example, fixed in this PR.

As noted by Jörg W Mittag:

There was a 4-month warning.
The entire Internet has been moving away from unauthenticated, unencrypted protocols for a decade, it's not like this is a huge surprise.

Personally, I consider it less an "issue" and more "detecting unmaintained dependencies".

Plus, this is still only the brownout period, so the protocol will only be disabled for a short period of time, allowing developers to discover the problem.

The permanent shutdown is not until March 15th.

For GitHub Actions:

As in actions/checkout issue 14, you can add as a first step:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70663523

QUESTION

TypeError: load() missing 1 required positional argument: 'Loader' in Google Colab

Asked 2022-Mar-04 at 11:01

I am trying to do a regular import in Google Colab.
This import worked up until now.
If I try:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Oct-15 at 21:11

Found the problem.
I was installing pandas_profiling, and this package updated pyyaml to version 6.0 which is not compatible with the current way Google Colab imports packages.
So just reverting back to pyyaml version 5.4.1 solved the problem.

For more information check versions of pyyaml here.
See this issue and formal answers in GitHub

##################################################################
For reverting back to pyyaml version 5.4.1 in your code, add the next line at the end of your packages installations:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69564817

QUESTION

npx create-react-app prompting to globally uninstall non-existent create-react-app package?

Asked 2022-Feb-19 at 03:11

I am having problems with npx create-react-app involving global installs. My confusion arises because as far as I'm aware the create-react-app package is not installed on my machine.

Some Details:

I start a react project (with typescript template) as I have previously and recently done on this same machine a number of times:

npx create-react-app --template typescript .

I get this prompt from the terminal

Need to install the following packages: create-react-app Ok to proceed? (y)

I press y to confirm it's okay to proceed. (If I press n, the process terminates with the following error: npm ERR! canceled.) The terminal then displays the following message

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Dec-21 at 14:45

You can try to locate the installed version by running:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70352503

QUESTION

Terraform AWS Provider Error: Value for unconfigurable attribute. Can't configure a value for "acl": its value will be decided automatically

Asked 2022-Feb-15 at 13:50

Just today, whenever I run terraform apply, I see an error something like this: Can't configure a value for "lifecycle_rule": its value will be decided automatically based on the result of applying this configuration.

It was working yesterday.

Following is the command I run: terraform init && terraform apply

Following is the list of initialized provider plugins:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Feb-15 at 13:49

Terraform AWS Provider is upgraded to version 4.0.0 which is published on 10 February 2022.

Major changes in the release include:

Version 4.0.0 of the AWS Provider introduces significant changes to the aws_s3_bucket resource.
Version 4.0.0 of the AWS Provider will be the last major version to support EC2-Classic resources as AWS plans to fully retire EC2-Classic Networking. See the AWS News Blog for additional details.
Version 4.0.0 and 4.x.x versions of the AWS Provider will be the last versions compatible with Terraform 0.12-0.15.

The reason for this change by Terraform is as follows: To help distribute the management of S3 bucket settings via independent resources, various arguments and attributes in the aws_s3_bucket resource have become read-only. Configurations dependent on these arguments should be updated to use the corresponding aws_s3_bucket_* resource. Once updated, new aws_s3_bucket_* resources should be imported into Terraform state.

So, I updated my code accordingly by following the guide here: Terraform AWS Provider Version 4 Upgrade Guide | S3 Bucket Refactor

The new working code looks like this:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71078462

QUESTION

Google app engine deployment fails- Error while finding module specification for 'pip' (AttributeError: module '__main__' has no attribute '__file__')

Asked 2022-Jan-08 at 22:02

We are using command prompt c:\gcloud app deploy app.yaml, but get the following error:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Jan-06 at 09:24

Your setuptools version is likely to be yanked:

https://pypi.org/project/setuptools/60.3.0/

Not sure how to fix that without a working pip though.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70602290

QUESTION

Why does the thread sanitizer complain about acquire/release thread fences?

Asked 2022-Jan-04 at 16:06

I'm learning about different memory orders.

I have this code, which works and passes GCC's and Clang's thread sanitizers:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Jan-04 at 16:06

The thread sanitizer currently doesn't support std::atomic_thread_fence. (GCC and Clang use the same thread sanitizer, so it applies to both.)

GCC 12 (currently trunk) warns about it:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70542993

QUESTION

What is the significance of 'strongly happens before' compared to '(simply) happens before'?

Asked 2022-Jan-02 at 18:21

The standard defines several 'happens before' relations that extend the good old 'sequenced before' over multiple threads:

[intro.races]
11 An evaluation A simply happens before an evaluation B if either

(11.1) — A is sequenced before B, or
(11.2) — A synchronizes with B, or
(11.3) — A simply happens before X and X simply happens before B.

[Note 10: In the absence of consume operations, the happens before and simply happens before relations are identical. — end note]

12 An evaluation A strongly happens before an evaluation D if, either

(12.1) — A is sequenced before D, or
(12.2) — A synchronizes with D, and both A and D are sequentially consistent atomic operations ([atomics.order]), or
(12.3) — there are evaluations B and C such that A is sequenced before B, B simply happens before C, and C is sequenced before D, or
(12.4) — there is an evaluation B such that A strongly happens before B, and B strongly happens before D.

[Note 11: Informally, if A strongly happens before B, then A appears to be evaluated before B in all contexts. Strongly happens before excludes consume operations. — end note]

^{(bold mine)}

The difference between the two seems very subtle. 'Strongly happens before' is never true for matching pairs or release-acquire operations (unless both are seq-cst), but it still respects release-acquire syncronization in a way, since operations sequenced before a release 'strongly happen before' the operations sequenced after the matching acquire.

Why does this difference matter?

'Strongly happens before' was introduced in C++20, and pre-C++20, 'simply happens before' used to be called 'strongly happens before'. Why was it introduced?

[atomics.order]/4 says that the total order of all seq-cst operations is consistent with 'strongly happens before'.

Does it mean that it's not consistent with 'simply happens before'? If so, why not?

I'm ignoring the plain 'happens before', because it differs from 'simply happens before' only in its handling of memory_order_consume, the use of which is temporarily discouraged, since apparently most (all?) major compilers treat it as memory_order_acquire.

I've already seen this Q&A, but it doesn't explain why 'strongly happens before' exists, and doesn't fully address what it means (it just states that it doesn't respect release-acquire syncronization, which isn't completely the case).

Found the proposal that introduced 'simply happens before'.

I don't fully understand it, but it explains following:

'Strongly happens before' is a weakened version of 'simply happens before'.
The difference is only observable when seq-cst is mixed with aqc-rel on the same variable (I think, it means when an acquire load reads a value from a seq-cst store, or when an seq-cst load reads a value from a release store). But the exact effects of mixing the two are still unclear to me.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Jan-02 at 18:21

Here's my current understanding, which could be incomplete or incorrect. A verification would be appreciated.

C++20 renamed strongly happens before to simply happens before, and introduced a new, more relaxed definition for strongly happens before, which imposes less ordering.

Simply happens before is used to reason about the presence of data races in your code. (Actually that would be the plain 'happens before', but the two are equivalent in absence of consume operations, the use of which is discouraged by the standard, since most (all?) major compilers treat them as acquires.)

The weaker strongly happens before is used to reason about the global order of seq-cst operations.

This change was introduced in proposal P0668R5: Revising the C++ memory model, which is based on the paper Repairing Sequential Consistency in C/C++11 by Lahav et al (which I didn't fully read).

The proposal explains why the change was made. Long story short, the way most compilers implement atomics on Power and ARM architectures turned out to be non-conformant in rare edge cases, and fixing the compilers had a performance cost, so they fixed the standard instead.

The change only affects you if you mix seq-cst operations with acquire-release operations on the same atomic variable (i.e. if an acquire operation reads a value from a seq-cst store, or a seq-cst operation reads a value from a release store).

If you don't mix operations in this manner, then you're not affected (i.e. can treat simply happens before and strongly happens before as equivalent).

The gist of the change is that the synchronization between a seq-cst operation and the corresponding acquire/release operation no longer affects the position of this specific seq-cst operation in the global seq-cst order, but the synchronization itself is still there.

This makes the seq-cst order for such seq-cst operations very moot, see below.

The proposal presents following example, and I'll try to explain my understanding of it:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70554277

QUESTION

How do I fix a Firebase 9.0 import error? "Attempted import error: 'firebase/app' does not contain a default export (imported as 'firebase')."

Asked 2022-Jan-02 at 09:35

I am trying to implement firebase in my React application but it seems my version of importing is outdated. Here is my code:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Aug-26 at 23:53

Follow the instructions in the documentation, which specifically calls out the steps for version 9:

Install Firebase using npm:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68946446

QUESTION

App Store Connect Upload Error "You haven't been given access to cloud-managed distribution certificates"

Asked 2021-Dec-22 at 10:31

Uploading an iOS app to App Store Connect with Xcode (Automatically manage signing) and received this error:

The following errors occurred while locating and generating signing assets. ...

Communication with Apple failed. You haven't been given access to cloud-managed distribution certificates. Please contact your team's Account Holder or an Admin to give you access. If you need further assistance, contact Apple Developer Program Support at https://developer.apple.com/support

I have checked:

the cert is installed and valid
I have access to Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Oct-18 at 01:45

the cert is installed and valid

That doesn't matter. New in Xcode 13, if you choose Automatic signing, Apple tries to do cloud-based signing; it doesn't even see the certificate that's on your computer.

But you do not have the cloud-based signing privilege, so it fails.

You have two choices:

Get the privilege. It is really worth it, because cloud-based signing is great! It allows you to distribute from an archive to App Store Connect without having any distribution identity or distribution certificate at all. This totally solves the problem that there's only one distribution certificate at a time.
Switch to manual signing. Now the distribution certificate on your computer will be used. You'll need explicit access to the distribution profile too, obviously; the whole export resigning will be manual. That might be simplest if you're in a hurry.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69609859

QUESTION

Xcode 13.2 - Adding package hangs on "Preparing to validate"

Asked 2021-Dec-21 at 13:51

I have recently updated to Xcode 13.2 from the Mac App Store. While trying to fix an issue with a Swift package, I uninstalled it and now I cannot reinstall the package.

When I try to add a package from GitHub the process hangs immediately on "Preparing to validate".

I already attempted to restart Xcode, restart my mac, clean derived data, reset Swift package caches and update package versions to no avail.

Is there any way around this issue?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Dec-14 at 04:14

Check https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/696504 and re-download Xcode 13.2 directly from the releases section of the Apple Developer website: https://developer.apple.com/download/release/

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70342833

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install store

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: