Coot | 玩转 IFTTT 体验极客生活，互联网自动化神器【已经停止开发】 | Automation library

by yehux Go Version: 0.3 License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(3)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | Coot Summary

Coot is a Go library typically used in Automation applications. Coot has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Coot

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

Coot has a low active ecosystem.

It has 171 star(s) with 25 fork(s). There are 5 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

There are 6 open issues and 0 have been closed. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of Coot is 0.3

Quality

Coot has no bugs reported.

Security

Coot has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

License

Coot is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

Coot releases are available to install and integrate.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of Coot

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

Coot Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for Coot.

Coot Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for Coot.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on Coot

Is it possible to derive a Generic instance of a recursive datatype?

Missing Definition And No Accessible Extension

Why put multiple interfaces in a single Java file for an Android app?

QUESTION

Is it possible to derive a Generic instance of a recursive datatype?

Asked 2020-Mar-25 at 05:28

I'm playing about with some types and the PureScript compiler. These are the types I've created (liberally stolen from purescript-dsl-example):

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Mar-25 at 05:28

Of course it's possible to derive Generic for your type, you're just not using the correct syntax. It should be like this:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60843260

QUESTION

Missing Definition And No Accessible Extension

Asked 2019-Dec-14 at 00:09

I'm trying to use SSIS to import Web API from the CMS Open Payment website. After extracting the data from the CMS website, I want to import it into my SQL Prod environment. However, I'm running into two issues.

Every time I edit the code of the script component, I have to manually add "Internal String" code to the "Bufferwrapper.cs" module class to avoid a "Missing Definition and No Accessible Extension" error (though the code is autogenerated and overwritten). Is there a way to give the fields definition and associate them with an accessible extension?

Here's an example of code I add to the BufferWrapper Class in order to get rid of the field errors

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Dec-14 at 00:09

Ok I got this to work, and want to step through a few things with you.

First why you were getting the error message "Property or Indexer “Output0Buffer.ChangeType“ cannot be assigned to -- it is read only". The reason you were getting this is that you had every attribute on your Output 0 buffer set to "text stream [DT_TEXT]". This is a blob data type, equivalent to varchar(max) or Text in SQL Server, and cannot simply be assigned using a "=". In order to do this in code you have to do this (example for Change_Type):

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59060399

QUESTION

Why put multiple interfaces in a single Java file for an Android app?

Asked 2018-Feb-14 at 03:16

I've been working on an Android app for a couple of months. In many of the more sophisticated open source programs I have read through, I keep coming across multiple interfaces or a class with an embedded interface in a single file. Even Android Studio generates fragments this way.

Now, I'm an old coot. I've been programming in Java since version 1.1. I have always been taught to put classes, interfaces, and enumerators in separate files. Related items go in the same package.

Is there a reason to stuff related interfaces into a single file instead of following this best-practice?

Example given:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-Feb-14 at 03:16

Defining the interface inside another class provides direction and context for that interface. A standalone OnCheckedChangeListener doesn't tell you as much about how the interface will be used as CompoundButton.OnCheckedChangeListener vs RadioGroup.OnCheckedChangeListener. It also allows the methods defined in these interfaces to be different without making the developer guess about which one to import to get what they need.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48778745

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install Coot

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: