servo | Netflix Application Monitoring Library | Monitoring library

Try converting it into bytes before sending

msg = bytes('1', 'utf-8')

Convert that to int after receiving

I had a very similar problem, which you replied to here, and I'll share what worked for me. If you are doing this for Sagemaker/AWS (which by the file directory path and the use of the word "payload" I assume you are?), then the problem is caused by a discrepancy in TensorFlow versions.

In all of the blogs I found (e.g. this one), they used framework_version 1.12 when loading their model using TensorflowModel. Because of this, I reinstalled TensorFlow in the Sagemaker Jupyter instance to version 1.12, retrained my model using 1.12, and changed the framework_version to 1.12, and this worked for me. If you aren't using the model for AWS this very well may not apply, but if you are then this is a potential solution. Good luck!

You should write your main loop around the concepts of "current value" and "want value", i.e., the values you want vs the values (angles) you currently are at. This can be expanded to any number of motors using arrays for the motors, and traversing their values in a loop. But for two, you can simply do the following.

I tried fiddling a bit to understand if the using statement might have been useful but seems it does not do what you want.

One possible solution is to use an intermediary class and manually invoke the implementation you want, like this:

I found the solution here: When calling servo.attach() in the constructor, the order of variable initialization is messed up. Creating an init() function to be called in setup() solves this problem.

Yes, it is ambiguous and the compiler will complain. You can write Major::moving or Minor::moving within the code of Arm's member functions to specify which you want.

I question whether you have a proper "isa" relationship here. An arm is not a motor. An arm has two motors. You should be using composition here instead of inheritance. Note that Major and Minor don't have any virtual functions so there is no reason to prefer inheritance.

Try:

You didn't provide your TRAIN_DATA, so I cannot reproduce it. However, you should try something like this:

I haven't tried it, but this should work. Please replace with the number of the pin to which your second touch sensor is connected.

did you try this?