FrameworkBenchmarks | Source for the TechEmpower Framework Benchmarks project | HTTP library

by TechEmpower Java Version: R20 License: Non-SPDX

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(1)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | FrameworkBenchmarks Summary

FrameworkBenchmarks is a Java library typically used in Networking, HTTP, Framework applications. FrameworkBenchmarks has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has medium support. However FrameworkBenchmarks build file is not available and it has a Non-SPDX License. You can download it from GitHub.

Source for the TechEmpower Framework Benchmarks project

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

FrameworkBenchmarks has a medium active ecosystem.

It has 6992 star(s) with 1869 fork(s). There are 232 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

There are 111 open issues and 1129 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 38 days. There are 6 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of FrameworkBenchmarks is R20

Quality

FrameworkBenchmarks has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

FrameworkBenchmarks has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

FrameworkBenchmarks code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

FrameworkBenchmarks has a Non-SPDX License.

Non-SPDX licenses can be open source with a non SPDX compliant license, or non open source licenses, and you need to review them closely before use.

Reuse

FrameworkBenchmarks releases are available to install and integrate.

FrameworkBenchmarks has no build file. You will be need to create the build yourself to build the component from source.

Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.

FrameworkBenchmarks saves you 52853 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.

It has 64721 lines of code, 3616 functions and 2133 files.

It has medium code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi has reviewed FrameworkBenchmarks and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into FrameworkBenchmarks implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.

Starts the test .
Gets the HttpHandler .
Read header .
Performs a single update query .
Entry point for the database .
Create the threads factory for the given buffer pool .
Handles requests to update a world .
Configure the query using the given filter .
Writes response body to session
Fetches a count of world objects from the database .

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

FrameworkBenchmarks Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for FrameworkBenchmarks.

FrameworkBenchmarks Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for FrameworkBenchmarks.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on FrameworkBenchmarks

In the TechEmpower benchmarks, the Netty application does not honor keepalive connections—is this on purpose?

QUESTION

In the TechEmpower benchmarks, the Netty application does not honor keepalive connections—is this on purpose?

Asked 2019-Oct-09 at 08:13

I am in the process of load testing a Netty application I have. I have been looking to various authorities to try to follow best practices both to learn more about Netty and just to become a better developer.

One of those authorities I'm consulting is the blazingly fast Netty application that is part of the TechEmpower framework benchmarks.

I've noticed that this application does not honor the Connection: Keep-Alive header that is sent as part of the test. Specifically, at the end of any given write operation, it closes the connection, even though the test requests that connections be kept alive. This is of course permitted, but…. Often times seemingly odd choices like this exist for good performance reasons. Is there a reason that the Netty application here chooses to close every connection instead of keeping them alive?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Oct-09 at 08:13

As far as I can see it only does this when it receive a request to an unexpected path, in which case it just closed the connection after the response was written.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58297177

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install FrameworkBenchmarks

To get started developing you'll need to install docker or see our Quick Start Guide using vagrant.
Clone TFB. $ git clone https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks.git
Change directories $ cd FrameworkBenchmarks
Run a test. $ ./tfb --mode verify --test gemini
Get started developing quickly by utilizing vagrant with TFB. Git, Virtualbox and vagrant are required.
Clone TFB. $ git clone https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks.git
Change directories $ cd FrameworkBenchmarks/deployment/vagrant
Build the vagrant virtual machine $ vagrant up
Run a test $ vagrant ssh $ tfb --mode verify --test gemini

Support

Our official documentation can be found in the wiki. If you find any errors or areas for improvement within the docs, feel free to open an issue in this repo.

Find more information at: