Mockery | Java library for mocking and testing networking layers | Mock library
kandi X-RAY | Mockery Summary
kandi X-RAY | Mockery Summary
Tired of writing over and over the same unit tests for testing Retrofit interfaces? Exhausted of asserting for success and failure response depending on the request? Irritated of implementing manually every Retrofit interface to mock server's behaviour? One step away from kill yourself just to get some sort of freedom?. Probably not, because you don't give a shit about all this. You don't test your network layer, neither you don't mock it, and of course you never listen to your mother. And that's good. That's fair enough. You should not do anything that could kill your delicate and delightful spirit. You should write a library and that library should do it for you. A library should exists and this library should generate unit tests and mock server responses based on simple rules. That was the thought, and the thought became nothing just like most good ideas. But I wrote that library -for you, for me, for all that children that cry at harsh nights when not unit tests come. That library is this library, and it is called Mockery and it generates all that crappy boring tests for you, and it mocks the server behaviour too. You just need to decorate the old good Retrofit interfaces with a bunch of annotations. It's not so hard.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Invokes a mockery
- Add interceptor methods
- Returns metadata for mockery or method
- Apply validations to parameters
- Returns the enclosing type for the given response type
- Returns true if the return method is a return method type
- Checks the return method return type
- Returns a random value from the metadata
- Merge common java types
- Handles illegal mock exception
- Returns the value of the metadata type
- Adapts a response to a method call
- Obtains the response body for a response
- Validates the candidate
- Implementation of IllegalMockException
- Adapts the method to the corresponding method type
- Called when a mock method is invoked
- Validates a candidate against the specified metadata
- Returns the supported types
- Validates the DTO
- Sets up the UI
- Validates a candidate
- Adapt the response asynchronously
- Returns the closest enclosing type for the given response type
- Validates the candidate method
- Handles illegal mock exceptions
Mockery Key Features
Mockery Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on Mockery
QUESTION
I'm using Laravel 7.3 and need to update to 8 because of plugins needings
I'm reading the documentation but as I'm a noob as in English like in computing I have some errors and problems
First of all, I followed this :
Update the following dependencies in your composer.json file:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-12 at 04:47Conclusion: don't install cviebrock/eloquent-sluggable 7.0.2 (conflict analysis result)
https://github.com/cviebrock/eloquent-sluggable
It clearly states in the package doc's that you need version 8 of the package for laravel 8.
So change
QUESTION
I recently performed a rather large update to this web app, and for the most part it went off without a hitch... Until the app tries to send an SMS notification from staging/production.
The upgrade from laravel 7.x to 8.x was quite simple and straightforward. At the same time we also installed Laravel Horizon. Everything went according to plan, and all works fine locally.
When we deploy to staging/production however, queued SMS notifications fail with the following exception:
ReflectionException: Class Http\Adapter\Guzzle6\Client does not exist in /home/forge/dev.example.com/releases/20210609194554/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Container/Container.php:836
Looking in the stack trace we can see that Nexmo is the culprit:
#5 /home/forge/dev.example.com/releases/20210609194554/vendor/nexmo/laravel/src/NexmoServiceProvider.php(150): Illuminate\Foundation\Application->make()
However in our composer.json file we are requiring Guzzle 7 with the following:
"guzzlehttp/guzzle": "^7.3",
It is worth mentioning again at this point, I have no issues sending SMS locally, the main difference between local and staging environments is that locally I use Laravel Valet and Staging uses Laravel Envoyer.
What I've tried so far:
- Changing
"guzzlehttp/guzzle": "^7.3"
to"guzzlehttp/guzzle": "^6.5|^7.3"
- Running
php artisan horizon:purge
andphp artisan horizon:terminate
both manually and in a deployment hook. - Restarting the laravel horizon daemon on forge.
- trying
php artisan queue:restart
- running
composer dump-autoload
andcomposer dump-autoload -o
- deleting composer.lock and the vendor/ directory from current/ then running
composer install
- Restarting PHP, Nginx, and eventually the entire server :(
and more...
Any help is greatly appreciated
UPDATE Below:
Complete composer.json:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-09 at 23:40I see that the NexmoServiceProvider
is trying to use the defined http_client
in the config, so can you share what the .env
has for NEXMO_HTTP_CLIENT
? I am pretty sure you have something wrong there or even not defined.
And this is what it is defined in the config/nexmo.php
related to that config:
QUESTION
UPDATE: it seems i found a bug. Here the ticket on github i created. David will solve the problem during the day.
I simply tried to follow the Heroku guide to create a simple laravel app (even without db connection) and deploy on a Heroku app. However, it appears that when using Composer 2 there are problems (see log here). Rolling back to Composer 1 is all right. In the Heroku documentation it is indicated that Composer 2 is supported but obviously I am doing something wrong since it gives me an error.
when I push modifications to Heroku i get this error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-06 at 14:37Just an update: I also used this guide provided by Heroku devcenter to create a simple laravel app and deploy it on heroku and i got the same result.
I suppose it could be a problem with Composer 2, but reading Heroku docs I understood Heroku support Composer 2
QUESTION
I'm getting this error while installing Laravel Scout:
Problem 1 - laravel/scout[v9.1.0, ..., 9.x-dev] require illuminate/bus ^8.0 -> found illuminate/bus[v8.0.0, ..., 8.x-dev] but these were not loaded, likely because it conflicts with another require. - Root composer.json requires laravel/scout ^9.1 -> satisfiable by laravel/scout[v9.1.0, 9.x-dev].
Use the option --with-all-dependencies (-W) to allow upgrades, downgrades and removals for packages currently locked to specific versions.
Here is my composer.json file:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-06 at 12:07In your composer you have "laravel/framework": "^7.29",
wich is equivalent to >=7.29 <8.0.0
but you're requiring illuminate/bus[v8.0.0, ..., 8.x-dev]
wich is part of laravel/framework >=8.0.0
So, you can't install laravel scount version >= 9.0
try installing version 8.6.1 wich is compatible with laravel 7.x with the command:
composer require "laravel/scout:^8.6.1"
QUESTION
My laravel app does not work on xampp or a live server but it works fine on the link provided by PHP artisan serve. Whenever I run this app on xampp it returns 404 error. I have other laravel apps also which work fine on xampp but this one. I am unable to find any solution to it that why my laravel is not running on a hosted server or xampp. I have tried all the solutions found in related questions but did not find any of those useful.
- I have tried running the app after changing my existing .htaccess file in the root folder.
- I have tried running the app after changing .htaccess file in public folder.
- I have tried running the app after deleting both and one of them.
- I have tried installing and updating the dependencies again using composer.
What should I do to make it running?
What I see when I try to run it through xampp is the errors, but the folder structure that always occurs when one runs a web app through it.
Right now, I have a single htaccess file which is in my root folder. Below is the code of it:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-04 at 07:52I've ran into this problem too. I've done some research and the only way I found possible to run Laravel on xampp was the following:
- In the parent folder of the laravel setup, I created a folder called "laravel" and moved everything inside of it.
- I went in laravel/public and took every file out of it, and I put it in the parent directory, resulting in the following folder structure: (in my htdocs)
QUESTION
I'm trying to deploy my Laravel/Vue.js app on Heroku, but I have an error when I'm trying to push.
Here is the error message :
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-03 at 11:08PROBLEM SOLVED : there was still a mysql
call in one of my files : at the end of my config/queue.php
file
I have change this :
QUESTION
i'm kind of new to laravel first time developing on it. My goal is to get some filtered events to show, the filters should all work together ('filter 1' AND 'filter2' ecc..) even when some are empty. The problem that i'm getting is that when my filter fields are empty the query won't return any event. My CONTROLLER code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-01 at 00:50Your original problem is probably that the input values are not null, but rather empty strings.
But conditional queries like this are a good use of the when()
query builder method. If the first argument evaluates to a non-false value, the second argument is executed.
QUESTION
Reading article : https://medium.com/@misteryomi/integrating-laravel-passport-in-your-lumen-project-with-example-1c2b8719c30
I try to install in lumen app laravel\passport with use of dusterio/lumen-passport pluging, but I stuck on app/Models/User.php modifications :
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-28 at 04:50Well, if the application can't find the passport's classes, you can force reinstall the dependencies using the composer command.
QUESTION
Scenario:
So, I've got a users table that contains a ForeignKey named parent_id
that references the id of the users table. This allows for one User to belongs to another User, and a User having Many "children" Users (one-to-many).
Now, the question itself is due to the unit testing. When I use records from a database it works as expected but mocking the relationship values doesn't seem it work. Also note that having this test being run against a database doesn't make sense as because the structure has a lot of dependencies.
The Goal: test the rule without hitting the database
The rule:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-26 at 21:49I think you might just be looking for $parentModel->setRelation($name, $modelOrEloquentCollection)
. If you're not actually saving the records to the DB, Eloquent won't connect them for you, even if the ID values match up.
QUESTION
I have a laravel app hosted on elastic beanstalk and it is also connected with code pipeline. When I deployed the application I got this error on ebs panel:
ERROR: During an aborted deployment, some instances may have deployed the new application version. To ensure all instances are running the same version, re-deploy the appropriate application version.
I don't know if it is related but when I downloaded the logs I found this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-26 at 06:38It seems that you have some typos. The special character "\" must be "\\" for folder separation. try this composer.json:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install Mockery
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page